Center for Business and Economic Research - Ball State University


CBER Data Center
Projects and PublicationsEconomic IndicatorsWeekly CommentaryCommunity Asset InventoryManufacturing Scorecard

About

Commentaries are published weekly and distributed through the Indianapolis Business Journal and many other print and online publications. Disclaimer

RSS Feed

Disclaimer

The views expressed in these commentaries do not reflect those of Ball State University or the Center for Business and Economic Research.

Recent

Grim Recessionary FactsTrump’s criticism of the BLS and Fed is at best a transparent effort to deflect blame for the ill effects of his tariff obsession.

Some Easy (and Not So Easy) Spending Cuts for the Next BudgetEach of the 50 states vary in tax collection, public services and benefits.

More Bad News About Hoosier College AttendanceLow educational attainment not only dooms a location to slow growth, but also it makes a place less attractive to college graduates.

It’s Stagflation, Not InflationTariffs work differently than inflation.

View archives

Top Tags

jobs and employment 267
economics 209
state and local government 193
education 192
indiana 178
economic development 175
law and public policy 151
taxes 151
budget and spending 150
workforce and human capital 144
Browse all tags
Reporter / Admin Login

August 10, 2025

Grim Recessionary Facts

In March, I predicted the U.S. economy would enter recession and in April I explained how Indiana would be especially vulnerable to this downturn (see https://commentaries.cberdata.org/1306/what-to-expect-in-this-recession and https://commentaries.cberdata.org/1310/the-stupidest-of-policies). Unfortunately, I was right. A large tranche of data—both public and private—makes that clear.

The tariffs have descended hard upon American businesses and consumers. Estimates of their downstream effects cluster around a $2,400 cost per family by the end of 2025, dropping to $2,000 a year in 2026 and later years as Americans buy fewer goods (see https://budgetlab.yale.edu/research/state-us-tariffs-july-28-2025). This has led economist Justin Wolfers to quip, "Trump has a pronoun problem. He keeps saying he's imposing tariffs on they/them. But he's actually imposing them on us." (see https://x.com/JustinWolfers/status/1944001832256233877).

Consumer sentiment has dropped by more than 10 percentage points since President Trump’s inauguration day and labor markets have stalled. Help wanted ads nationally dropped by 21% since Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariff announcements and by 27% here in Indiana. The private sector jobs number from ADP shows job growth effectively stopped in April.

These private data tell a rich and consistent story about the economy, but public sector data are more accurate and complete. This requires comment on data integrity and character.

U.S. economic data has been the envy of the world since the Great Depression. It is fast, accurate, nonpartisan and profoundly transparent. It is collected by a group of quiet professionals with input from hundreds of organizations and individuals. These data make the U.S. the most trustworthy and reliable destination for foreign investment.

Trump fired the director of the Bureau of Labor Statistics on Aug. 1 because he didn’t like these data. Trump claimed the data were biased against him. That is false. Trump is afraid of facts and likely to become more fearful as more facts emerge—economic or otherwise. He has good reason to be scared on all counts.

The latest federal jobs report indicated that the U.S. economy stalled shortly after tariffs were announced. Overall job creation dropped to near zero and manufacturing employment declined by 33,000 jobs in just three months. Since the tariffs were announced, Indiana lost 2,600 factory jobs—and that is without the most recent month’s data, which have not been released.

Factory orders have plummeted to levels not seen since COVID and, before that, the Great Recession. On a scale of self-inflicted economic wounds, this is unparalleled.

Formally, recessions are determined by the Business Cycle Dating Committee of the National Bureau of Economic Research, which uses six indicators. Between March and April—when I first said we had walked into a recession—four of these six turned negative. Only employment and industrial production remained (modestly) positive. By the next data release, both of those indicators will be negative.

Trump inherited an economy that grew at 2.4% last year. Job creation has slowed dramatically under Trump—from over 180,000 monthly in 2024 to just 35,000 since the tariffs began.

If the BLS continues to deliver honest job numbers, we should expect no job growth until 2026—if then.

Unlike typical recessions, prices are rising due to tariffs, making it harder for the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates to help the economy. So, as we move into fall, we should expect accumulating job losses, higher prices and a Fed hesitant to cut rates when the problem is solely that of bad tariffs, not monetary policy.

Trump’s criticism of the Fed, like that of the BLS, is at best a transparent effort to deflect blame for the ill effects of his tariff obsession.

Another uncommon aspect of this recession is that it is isolated to the U.S. We did this to ourselves by starting a trade war with the rest of the world. No other countries seem especially interested in crashing their own economies.

This diminishes the attractiveness of the U.S. as a destination for foreign investment. The situation is worsened by the reasonable suspicion that the Trump administration will deliver fictional economic data. Foreign investors may flee, driving up borrowing costs.

So, as the U.S. enters a downturn all alone, with the specter of falsified economic data, we should all expect home mortgages, credit card rates and car loans to be higher in the months and years to come. Capital markets are ruthless towards erratic and bizarre economic policies—and whatever else they might be, Trump’s economic policies are erratic and bizarre.

Link to this commentary: https://commentaries.cberdata.org/1327/grim-recessionary-facts

Tags: business, capitalism, data, economy, federal government, federal reserve, finance, foreign policy, incentives, jobs and employment, law and public policy, leadership, manufacturing, politics, pres. trump administration, prices and inflation, regulation, recession, taxes, united states of america, trade and tariffs


About the Author

Michael Hicks cberdirector@bsu.edu

Michael J. Hicks, PhD, is the director of the Center for Business and Economic Research and the George and Frances Ball distinguished professor of economics in the Miller College of Business at Ball State University. Note: The views expressed here are solely those of the author, and do not represent those of funders, associations, any entity of Ball State University, or its governing body.

© Center for Business and Economic Research, Ball State University

About Ball State CBER Data Center

Ball State CBER Data Center is one-stop shop for economic data including demographics, education, health, and social capital. Our easy-to-use, visual web tools offer data collection and analysis for grant writers, economic developers, policy makers, and the general public.

Ball State CBER Data Center (cberdata.org) is a product of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. CBER's mission is to conduct relevant and timely public policy research on a wide range of economic issues affecting the state and nation. Learn more.

Terms of Service

Center for Business and Economic Research

Ball State University • Whitinger Business Building, room 149
2000 W. University Ave.
Muncie, IN 47306-0360
Phone:
765-285-5926
Email:
cber@bsu.edu
Website:
www.bsu.edu/cber
Facebook:
www.facebook.com/BallStateCBER
Twitter:
www.twitter.com/BallStateCBER
Close