Center for Business and Economic Research - Ball State University


CBER Data Center
Projects and PublicationsEconomic IndicatorsWeekly CommentaryCommunity Asset InventoryManufacturing Scorecard

About

Commentaries are published weekly and distributed through the Indianapolis Business Journal and many other print and online publications. Disclaimer

RSS Feed

Disclaimer

The views expressed in these commentaries do not reflect those of Ball State University or the Center for Business and Economic Research.

Recent

Two Key Economic Lessons in One BillHoosiers face trade-offs and opportunity costs in the wake of SEA1.

Time to Fix Economic Development PolicyAllocating tax dollars to land development won’t cause economic growth.

The Unanticipated Effects of SB1Businesses, governments and households may all feel the effects.

The Stupidest of PoliciesThis whipsawing of tariff rates has unnerved financial markets, which on Wednesday, were toying with a liquidity crisis.

View archives

Top Tags

jobs and employment 261
economics 201
state and local government 188
education 186
economic development 171
indiana 171
budget and spending 145
taxes 144
law and public policy 142
workforce and human capital 139
Browse all tags
Reporter / Admin Login

October 2, 2016

Economic Changes Mean Primacy of Place Matters

In 1960 more than one in three American households were dependent on manufacturing jobs, and half of a typical family paycheck went to the purchase of manufactured goods. A consequence of this was that economic activity at the local level largely followed the ebb and flow of footloose manufacturing firms.

This was a thriving time in the Midwest. Our cities were prosperous, and seemingly immune to some of the decay already impacting eastern cities. Downtown Muncie, Terre Haute, Flint, Sheboygan, Toledo and Youngstown seemed to flourish. They weren’t perfect places, but there was surely a sense of optimism about the future. Sadly, there was already reason to suspect otherwise.

The loss of employment that plagued large eastern cities was destined for the Midwest. Many Midwestern cities hit peak manufacturing employment in the 1960s, and nearly all had done so by 1977 when manufacturing jobs were at their peak nationally. The jobs dwindled, not due to foreign trade, but because America is a great place to make things. As testament to that, manufacturing production has continued to grow, in inflation-adjusted dollars, peaking with the last data release in 2015.

At the same time manufacturing jobs slipped away, American households spent a smaller share of earnings on goods, and more on services. In the mid 1960s half of income went to goods; it is now below 30 percent. One result was that most jobs are now dependent upon being close to people. The footloose manufacturing economy of 1960 has been almost entirely supplanted by non-footloose jobs, which are dependent upon the size and earnings of the local population.

Economic development policy has mostly ignored these changes. Today, Indiana’s local governments squander more than $1 billion a year on attracting footloose jobs, though there are fewer of those now than in 1970. Over the same time, the number of non-footloose jobs grew by more than 90 million. Much of that government spending has come at the expense of more fundamental investments in cities and towns. A half century of chasing smokestacks has left many Midwestern towns broken, decayed and shrinking.

Growing places in the United States have ended the costly and ineffective policies of attracting businesses, focusing instead on attracting the households. This feeds the demand for modern commerce. These polices go by many names: talent attraction, quality of place, place-based economic development, and my favorite ‘Primacy of Place.’

Understandably, many Midwestern voters are confused by these policies. They aren’t easy to define because every community has different strengths and weaknesses. Carmel’s needs are different than Winchester’s, which are different than Jasper’s. In some places (mostly the larger and more affluent communities) these Primacy of Place efforts involve spending on expensive public amenities. More commonly, it means a renewed focus on quality schools and the mechanics of good government—clean, paved streets, crime-free neighborhoods, and responsive local government.

A focus on Primacy of Place isn’t some new economic development fad. It reflects the fundamental change that has occurred in the structure of our economy over the last half century or longer. The policies themselves aren’t fads either. The focus on good schools, safe, clean streets, and effective local governance is what successful Midwestern cities were doing a century ago when they were the growth marvel of the world. It is well past time to return to our roots.

Link to this commentary: https://commentaries.cberdata.org/858/economic-changes-mean-primacy-of-place-matters

Tags: economic development, growth, jobs and employment, migration and population change, productivity and efficiency, quality of life and placemaking


About the Author

Michael Hicks cberdirector@bsu.edu

Michael J. Hicks, PhD, is the director of the Center for Business and Economic Research and the George and Frances Ball distinguished professor of economics in the Miller College of Business at Ball State University. Note: The views expressed here are solely those of the author, and do not represent those of funders, associations, any entity of Ball State University, or its governing body.

© Center for Business and Economic Research, Ball State University

About Ball State CBER Data Center

Ball State CBER Data Center is one-stop shop for economic data including demographics, education, health, and social capital. Our easy-to-use, visual web tools offer data collection and analysis for grant writers, economic developers, policy makers, and the general public.

Ball State CBER Data Center (cberdata.org) is a product of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. CBER's mission is to conduct relevant and timely public policy research on a wide range of economic issues affecting the state and nation. Learn more.

Terms of Service

Center for Business and Economic Research

Ball State University • Whitinger Business Building, room 149
2000 W. University Ave.
Muncie, IN 47306-0360
Phone:
765-285-5926
Email:
cber@bsu.edu
Website:
www.bsu.edu/cber
Facebook:
www.facebook.com/BallStateCBER
Twitter:
www.twitter.com/BallStateCBER
Close