Center for Business and Economic Research - Ball State University


CBER Data Center
Projects and PublicationsEconomic IndicatorsWeekly CommentaryCommunity Asset InventoryManufacturing Scorecard

About

Commentaries are published weekly and distributed through the Indianapolis Business Journal and many other print and online publications. Disclaimer

RSS Feed

Disclaimer

The views expressed in these commentaries do not reflect those of Ball State University or the Center for Business and Economic Research.

Recent

It’s Stagflation, Not InflationTariffs work differently than inflation.

A Golden Age of Economic ColumnistsThe recent mayoral primaries in NYC provide plentiful material for discussion.

Churchill Was Right About AmericansSuccess demands that we look a problem squarely in the eye.

More Changes to Economic Development Policy Are NeededThe IEDC board should consider whether they should be picking winners and losers in both business attraction and location.

View archives

Top Tags

jobs and employment 266
economics 208
state and local government 191
education 190
indiana 176
economic development 174
taxes 149
budget and spending 149
law and public policy 148
workforce and human capital 142
Browse all tags
Reporter / Admin Login

July 20, 2025

It’s Stagflation, Not Inflation

The average American family will pay about $2,500 more this year because of tariffs. But unlike inflation, your wages won't rise to compensate. That's because tariffs work differently than inflation.

Tariffs cause an increase in the price of goods, both imported and their domestic competitors. But that price increase is not technically inflation—it’s worse. Here is what is actually happening.

Inflation is a decline in the value of currency over time. It happens because there is too much currency in circulation. That extra money can enter the economy through a growing deficit, as happened after the 2020 CARES Act, the 2021 American Rescue Plan and—the most inflationary of these—President Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill (see https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/post-pandemic-us-inflation-tale-fiscal-and-monetary-policy and https://www.nber.org/digest/20239/unpacking-causes-pandemic-era-inflation-us and https://taxfoundation.org/blog/one-big-beautiful-bill-pros-cons/).

Still, tax and spending policy alone cannot cause inflation. The Federal Reserve must also allow too much money growth.

Inflation affects all goods and services, including wages. So, during this unpleasant bout of inflation, wages actually grew more than prices—at least for the average private sector worker.

Tariffs work very differently. Tariffs are taxes on imports and range from 10% to 55%, depending on the country of origin, the product in question and the president’s hormone level.

Following the 2018 tariffs, we learned from multiple studies that American consumers paid almost all the tariffs (see https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257%2Fjep.33.4.187). This was to be expected, because we’re a rich country buying goods from poorer nations. We are likely to be less price sensitive than manufacturing firms in developing countries. Hence, we pay more of—or nearly all of—the tariffs.

The good news is that in February, March and April, American imports spiked (see https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/IMPTOTIN). In those three months alone, we bought roughly five extra months’ worth of goods. Those purchases were clearly intended to beat the tariff deadlines and avoid the extra tax.

That surge of imports meant that many of the goods now on store shelves and being assembled into cars, computers and washing machines were bought before the tariffs. That pre-tariff stockpile has meant that price increases have been relatively low so far.

The bad news is that only $335 of that $2,500 family tariff bill has hit so far (see https://www.reuters.com/business/trumps-tariff-collections-expected-grow-june-us-budget-data-2025-07-11/ and https://budgetlab.yale.edu/research/state-us-tariffs-july-14-2025). The rest is coming as importing firms pass along their costs.

The consumer price index—the main measure of inflation—rose 0.3% in the latest reading (see https://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.nr0.htm). That's modest, but it came as the Federal Reserve was successfully reducing inflation. Prices have stopped falling and are rising again.

These higher prices are solely due to Trump tariffs. They are poised to worsen substantially as the stockpile of pre-tariff goods are sold by retailers or put onto cars, RVs and other American-made products. The cost of goods sold later this summer, and until tariffs are eliminated, will continue to rise.

This increase in prices and the consumer price index will look, feel and taste just like inflation. Journalists and even economists will call it inflation, but it’s not inflation. If it was inflation, we’d eventually see wages rising as well. But higher tariff costs don’t lead to higher wages; in fact, the opposite may occur.

The tariffs took the U.S. from 2.4% growth in the fourth quarter of 2024 to -0.5% in the first quarter this year. The economy continues contracting, which will reduce wage growth and maybe even reverse it. So, as prices go up, wages will decline for the average worker.

We import goods to make American workers more productive. Skilled American workers focus on high-value manufacturing while importing cheaper components from abroad. When tariffs force companies to pay more for imports or make low-value parts themselves, productivity falls. That means lower wages and profits—or more job automation.

In the two months of data since Trump’s Liberation Day tariffs were announced, the U.S. has lost 14,000 factory jobs. The slowdown in the economy this year follows a pattern that is nearly a precise example of what economic explanations of tariffs have predicted for a half century.

The price increases due to tariffs are not technically inflation. Economists have a name for rising prices during a weak economy: stagflation. It's what made the 1970s so miserable.

Link to this commentary: https://commentaries.cberdata.org/1324/it-s-stagflation-not-inflation

Tags: taxes, trade, united states of america, foreign policy, business, china, cost of living, economic impact, economics, europe, family and households, federal government, federal reserve, government, incentives, jobs and employment, law and public policy, leadership, manufacturing, politics, pres. trump administration, prices and inflation, the middle class


About the Author

Michael Hicks cberdirector@bsu.edu

Michael J. Hicks, PhD, is the director of the Center for Business and Economic Research and the George and Frances Ball distinguished professor of economics in the Miller College of Business at Ball State University. Note: The views expressed here are solely those of the author, and do not represent those of funders, associations, any entity of Ball State University, or its governing body.

© Center for Business and Economic Research, Ball State University

About Ball State CBER Data Center

Ball State CBER Data Center is one-stop shop for economic data including demographics, education, health, and social capital. Our easy-to-use, visual web tools offer data collection and analysis for grant writers, economic developers, policy makers, and the general public.

Ball State CBER Data Center (cberdata.org) is a product of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. CBER's mission is to conduct relevant and timely public policy research on a wide range of economic issues affecting the state and nation. Learn more.

Terms of Service

Center for Business and Economic Research

Ball State University • Whitinger Business Building, room 149
2000 W. University Ave.
Muncie, IN 47306-0360
Phone:
765-285-5926
Email:
cber@bsu.edu
Website:
www.bsu.edu/cber
Facebook:
www.facebook.com/BallStateCBER
Twitter:
www.twitter.com/BallStateCBER
Close