Center for Business and Economic Research - Ball State University


CBER Data Center
Projects and PublicationsEconomic IndicatorsWeekly CommentaryCommunity Asset InventoryManufacturing Scorecard

About

Commentaries are published weekly and distributed through the Indianapolis Business Journal and many other print and online publications. Disclaimer

RSS Feed

Disclaimer

The views expressed in these commentaries do not reflect those of Ball State University or the Center for Business and Economic Research.

Recent

Two Key Economic Lessons in One BillHoosiers face trade-offs and opportunity costs in the wake of SEA1.

Time to Fix Economic Development PolicyAllocating tax dollars to land development won’t cause economic growth.

The Unanticipated Effects of SB1Businesses, governments and households may all feel the effects.

The Stupidest of PoliciesThis whipsawing of tariff rates has unnerved financial markets, which on Wednesday, were toying with a liquidity crisis.

View archives

Top Tags

jobs and employment 261
economics 201
state and local government 188
education 186
economic development 171
indiana 171
budget and spending 145
taxes 144
law and public policy 142
workforce and human capital 139
Browse all tags
Reporter / Admin Login

June 28, 2015

Some Truth about Hoosier School Budgets

There is almost no subject in public finance that is as easy to demagogue, distort and mislead as funding for schools. It is helpful to review what is happening in Indiana and how we got here.

In 2008, along with property tax reform, the entirety of the school operational funding was shifted from local taxpayers to the state general fund. This is part of a nationwide trend motivated largely by a series of successful lawsuits that forced states to eliminate the funding inequities between rich and poor communities. Indiana was wise to do this. The last thing Hoosiers need is for the courts to come up with school funding formulas.

The result of the funding shift was beginning in the 2008-2009 school year; the state paid instructional costs while local governments largely paid for new facilities and transportation. More money can be raised through local referendum, but schools today take almost half the state budget and more than four out of 10 local property tax dollars.

Those local property tax dollars are dependent upon the amount of taxable property in a school corporation, the tax rates collected by other taxing authorities and the amount of property taxes abated or absorbed into tax increment financing (TIF). The much larger state share is paid out through a school funding formula.

The Indiana school funding formula, like that in other states, sets a base rate and then adjusts it for a variety of factors. These factors basically result in more payments to school corporations with poorer kids. The result is that relatively affluent places like Zionsville get a tad more than $5,500 per student while Muncie received more than $7,100 per student and East Chicago schools something like $8,050.

The legislature has twice revised the formula in recent years. One move eliminated a clause that counted students after they left a school. The second flattened the payment differences between schools. Both of these moves were aimed at reducing the bias in funding that short changed growing communities. That bias remains very large. In the example above East Chicago receives more than $60,000 per classroom than does Zionsville.

The simple fact is that Hoosier students have been getting budget increases each year since the recession ended, yet a surprising number of folks think otherwise. Since funding is tied to students, not schools, population decline leads to overall budget reductions even when per student spending is rising. The demagoguery and distortion is easy when there is a very strong nexus between school performance and population growth. With a handful of exceptions, low-performing schools are losing population while high-performing schools are growing. Households vote with their feet on these matters.

Budget cuts and budget increases occur for good reasons, and we all should understand why and how these budgets change. In the end, trimming budgets is difficult, necessary work and Indiana taxpayers should not be subsidizing shrinking communities.

Link to this commentary: https://commentaries.cberdata.org/792/some-truth-about-hoosier-school-budgets

Tags: education, state and local government, migration and population change, budget and spending


About the Author

Michael Hicks cberdirector@bsu.edu

Michael J. Hicks, PhD, is the director of the Center for Business and Economic Research and the George and Frances Ball distinguished professor of economics in the Miller College of Business at Ball State University. Note: The views expressed here are solely those of the author, and do not represent those of funders, associations, any entity of Ball State University, or its governing body.

© Center for Business and Economic Research, Ball State University

About Ball State CBER Data Center

Ball State CBER Data Center is one-stop shop for economic data including demographics, education, health, and social capital. Our easy-to-use, visual web tools offer data collection and analysis for grant writers, economic developers, policy makers, and the general public.

Ball State CBER Data Center (cberdata.org) is a product of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. CBER's mission is to conduct relevant and timely public policy research on a wide range of economic issues affecting the state and nation. Learn more.

Terms of Service

Center for Business and Economic Research

Ball State University • Whitinger Business Building, room 149
2000 W. University Ave.
Muncie, IN 47306-0360
Phone:
765-285-5926
Email:
cber@bsu.edu
Website:
www.bsu.edu/cber
Facebook:
www.facebook.com/BallStateCBER
Twitter:
www.twitter.com/BallStateCBER
Close