Center for Business and Economic Research - Ball State University


CBER Data Center
Projects and PublicationsEconomic IndicatorsWeekly CommentaryCommunity Asset InventoryManufacturing Scorecard

About

Commentaries are published weekly and distributed through the Indianapolis Business Journal and many other print and online publications. Disclaimer

RSS Feed

Disclaimer

The views expressed in these commentaries do not reflect those of Ball State University or the Center for Business and Economic Research.

Recent

Remote Work Through the Eyes of Three 20-SomethingsRemote work is here to stay.

Remote Work and Labor MarketsThere are more remote workers today than there are immigrants in the U.S.

The Amish in IndianaIt is hard not to draw similarities between the Amish and newer immigrant groups.

Subsidizing Builders Fixes the Wrong Housing ProblemRemote workers and their families can now live wherever they wish.

View archives

Top Tags

jobs and employment 227
economics 175
education 145
economic development 143
state and local government 123
taxes 122
finance 108
budget and spending 100
recession 100
indiana 99
Browse all tags
Reporter / Admin Login

January 5, 2014

Economic Systems, North Korea and the ACA

When I speak with people about economics, which happens far more than my wife would prefer, we inevitably use the phrase 'economic system' to refer to some aspect of our topic.  That is inevitable, of course; we are surrounded by 'systems' such as the school system, the wireless telephone system and all sorts of things devised, organized and implemented by man. 

The problem is that the economy we have is not a system; it is a series of markets, great and small, that, by their very nature, cannot be organized. This observation infuriates many on both the left and right who refuse to surrender their hopes that grand pieces of the economy can be crafted in ways to suit their goals. 

Like almost all economists I dismiss the 'systems control' approach to the economy as fantasy, but you don't have to give weight to my musings on the matter.  It might be better to make an intellectual voyage to the places treating the economy as a true system.  History is replete with examples, but I advise going right to the contemporary bastion of economic systems; the People's Republic of Korea.

North Korea is the most centrally planned state of modern times.  Others include Cuba, the former Soviet Bloc countries and even large swathes of China, but North Korea offers the best example of a half-century of an unfettered systems approach to the economy. 

South Korean men grow more than three inches taller than their Northern kinsmen, due to the failure of ‘the system’ to deliver food effectively. The comparison between economic system and market on the Korean Peninsula offers real insight into the differences the approaches make in the lives of citizens.

Some might argue that North Korea is an ill-run anomaly that poorly represents the benefits of an economic system.  That is a mistaken view.  North Korean central planners are the best in the world.  They have been at it since the 1940s, and failure is punished rather harshly.  

The simple truth about the effectiveness of managing an economic system has some important implications for American public policy today.  Take for example, the Affordable Care Act. The apparent failure of the website wasn't actually a failure.  It did exactly what a dozen different government agencies wanted it to do.  Sadly, only one of them worried much about its ability to connect consumers to insurers.  That is only the beginning as nearly all facets other than marketing fail.  A complete overhaul of the law is in the cards.  

Still, somewhere right now, some central committee of the North Korean government is chuckling at us.  They knew the Affordable Care Act would fail because it is too complex and we are too accustomed to personal liberty to submit to its demands. 

So, if we are going to make the economic system of the ACA functional, we are going to have to ditch a good many of our personal liberties, and we’ll need the help of some smart North Korean planners.

 

 

Link to this commentary: https://commentaries.cberdata.org/711/economic-systems-north-korea-and-the-aca

Tags: economic impact, economics, foreign policy, government


About the Author

Michael Hicks cberdirector@bsu.edu

Michael J. Hicks, PhD, is the director of the Center for Business and Economic Research and the George and Frances Ball distinguished professor of economics in the Miller College of Business at Ball State University. Hicks earned doctoral and master’s degrees in economics from the University of Tennessee and a bachelor’s degree in economics from Virginia Military Institute. He has authored two books and more than 60 scholarly works focusing on state and local public policy, including tax and expenditure policy and the impact of Wal-Mart on local economies.

© Center for Business and Economic Research, Ball State University

About Ball State CBER Data Center

Ball State CBER Data Center is one-stop shop for economic data including demographics, education, health, and social capital. Our easy-to-use, visual web tools offer data collection and analysis for grant writers, economic developers, policy makers, and the general public.

Ball State CBER Data Center (cberdata.org) is a product of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. CBER's mission is to conduct relevant and timely public policy research on a wide range of economic issues affecting the state and nation. Learn more.

Terms of Service

Center for Business and Economic Research

Ball State University • Whitinger Business Building, room 149
2000 W. University Ave.
Muncie, IN 47306-0360
Phone:
765-285-5926
Email:
cber@bsu.edu
Website:
www.bsu.edu/cber
Facebook:
www.facebook.com/BallStateCBER
Twitter:
www.twitter.com/BallStateCBER
Close