Center for Business and Economic Research - Ball State University


CBER Data Center
Projects and PublicationsEconomic IndicatorsWeekly CommentaryCommunity Asset InventoryManufacturing Scorecard

About

Commentaries are published weekly and distributed through the Indianapolis Business Journal and many other print and online publications. Disclaimer

RSS Feed

Disclaimer

The views expressed in these commentaries do not reflect those of Ball State University or the Center for Business and Economic Research.

Recent

Two Key Economic Lessons in One BillHoosiers face trade-offs and opportunity costs in the wake of SEA1.

Time to Fix Economic Development PolicyAllocating tax dollars to land development won’t cause economic growth.

The Unanticipated Effects of SB1Businesses, governments and households may all feel the effects.

The Stupidest of PoliciesThis whipsawing of tariff rates has unnerved financial markets, which on Wednesday, were toying with a liquidity crisis.

View archives

Top Tags

jobs and employment 261
economics 201
state and local government 188
education 186
economic development 171
indiana 171
budget and spending 145
taxes 144
law and public policy 142
workforce and human capital 139
Browse all tags
Reporter / Admin Login

May 19, 2013

The Heritage Foundation, Immigration and Moral Courage

A recent study by conservative think-tank the Heritage Foundation sheds a great deal of light on the sausage mill of policy research, and the courage and integrity of the process of policy research altogether.

The Heritage study itself estimated that over the next 50 years, the relaxing of immigration rules in the U.S. would cost taxpayers trillions of dollars. The study was performed by a recent Harvard Ph.D. and a former federal budget official.  From what I can tell, given the assumptions the authors used, the calculations are about right, but policy studies are not solely about calculations. For example, the study calculated that increased legalization of immigrants would be a huge budget windfall for more than a decade. Had they looked a decade, or even two or three decades out, it was clear that immigrants were a huge fiscal boon. This is pretty much what every other economist who has studied the matter has also concluded. So, the study generated an intense round of criticism, some of which was well deserved.

The authors chose an improbably long horizon from which to make fiscal estimates of immigration. Fifty-year-long studies often have merit, but not on issues like Medicaid, educational cost, and other things that are heavily dependent upon adaptive public policy. So, the choice of this time horizon naturally smelled a bit like a selective interpretation of the data. Good research should illuminate, not merely support an opinion. Still, the criticism of the study is most pointed in its targeting of the assumptions underlying immigrant behavior over the next 50 years. The study assumed that immigrants, their children, and their grandchildren would exhibit very little integration into society and use public services at a much higher rate than the native population. This might or might not be true, but it is certain that how true it will actually be dramatically alters the conclusions of the study. For this reason alone, the study is of limited policy value, but the story didn’t end there.

It turns out the researcher with the Harvard Ph.D. has been guilty of studying the link between IQ and immigration in the United States. Now I don’t think this is an especially interesting area of research, not only because it relies on data derived from the highly questionable research of psychologists, but because there’s no good policy use for the answers. Still, neither the intense study of irrelevant issues, nor an ill-informed attack on research is newsworthy. What is notable is the reaction of the Heritage Foundation. They fired the man for the content of his doctoral dissertation, which was approved by leading academics of the center and left. That is cowardice, pure and simple.

Jim DeMint shocked many in Washington when he resigned from the Senate to lead and revive the Heritage Foundation. In only six weeks he has heaped more damage on the institution than most could manage in an entire career, while demonstrating deep cowardice in the process. Perhaps he should head back to the Senate.

Link to this commentary: https://commentaries.cberdata.org/677/the-heritage-foundation-immigration-and-moral-courage

Tags: budget and spending, economic impact, taxes, immigration, forecast, law and public policy, law and public policy


About the Author

Michael Hicks cberdirector@bsu.edu

Michael J. Hicks, PhD, is the director of the Center for Business and Economic Research and the George and Frances Ball distinguished professor of economics in the Miller College of Business at Ball State University. Note: The views expressed here are solely those of the author, and do not represent those of funders, associations, any entity of Ball State University, or its governing body.

© Center for Business and Economic Research, Ball State University

About Ball State CBER Data Center

Ball State CBER Data Center is one-stop shop for economic data including demographics, education, health, and social capital. Our easy-to-use, visual web tools offer data collection and analysis for grant writers, economic developers, policy makers, and the general public.

Ball State CBER Data Center (cberdata.org) is a product of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. CBER's mission is to conduct relevant and timely public policy research on a wide range of economic issues affecting the state and nation. Learn more.

Terms of Service

Center for Business and Economic Research

Ball State University • Whitinger Business Building, room 149
2000 W. University Ave.
Muncie, IN 47306-0360
Phone:
765-285-5926
Email:
cber@bsu.edu
Website:
www.bsu.edu/cber
Facebook:
www.facebook.com/BallStateCBER
Twitter:
www.twitter.com/BallStateCBER
Close