Center for Business and Economic Research - Ball State University


CBER Data Center
Projects and PublicationsEconomic IndicatorsWeekly CommentaryCommunity Asset InventoryManufacturing Scorecard

About

Commentaries are published weekly and distributed through the Indianapolis Business Journal and many other print and online publications. Disclaimer

RSS Feed

Disclaimer

The views expressed in these commentaries do not reflect those of Ball State University or the Center for Business and Economic Research.

Recent

Two Key Economic Lessons in One BillHoosiers face trade-offs and opportunity costs in the wake of SEA1.

Time to Fix Economic Development PolicyAllocating tax dollars to land development won’t cause economic growth.

The Unanticipated Effects of SB1Businesses, governments and households may all feel the effects.

The Stupidest of PoliciesThis whipsawing of tariff rates has unnerved financial markets, which on Wednesday, were toying with a liquidity crisis.

View archives

Top Tags

jobs and employment 261
economics 201
state and local government 188
education 186
economic development 171
indiana 171
budget and spending 145
taxes 144
law and public policy 142
workforce and human capital 139
Browse all tags
Reporter / Admin Login

November 18, 2012

Thelma and Louise Approach the Fiscal Cliff

The spirit of compromise survived less than 24 post-election hours.  By then House Republicans ruled out any tax increase, while the president called for a tax increase on the rich.  I think this is increasing evidence that we will come very close to the fiscal cliff.  This is because the fiscal cliff might well be the best compromise that can be worked out in D.C. in the coming months.  Let me explain.

Generally, one side of our body politic wishes to shrink the size and scope of government.  The other wants to expand the reach and powers of government.  Neither side has done a sufficient job in persuading a sizable majority that they are right (although, to be fair, one side has huge short-term advantages by handing out scooby snacks).  A compromise on dealing with our budget deficit requires one or both sides to concede central parts of their arguments.  This has potentially huge consequences for the political economy of future elections so there's not much compromise on the wind.

The spending cuts of the fiscal cliff will be far less broadly injurious than most suppose.  That is simply because there is a lot of fat to cut before it becomes painful.  The one exception will be a collapse of defense acquisitions, which will pummel many communities.  Taxes are the big issue.

Republicans have vowed not to raise taxes. They argue with factual accuracy that the Bush taxes made the income tax system more progressive and that a significant share of high income earners are actually small companies who do not pay corporate taxes.  They also contend, with less empirical support, that higher taxes on these groups will stall the economy.  Higher tax collections and (worse still) higher rates will slow the economy, but won't kill it. 

Democrats wish to eliminate the Bush tax cuts, but only on the rich.  They have had great fortune in demonizing the Bush tax cuts, but in reality Democrats are terrified of a complete repeal, as well they should be.  The end of the Bush tax cuts will increase by a third the number of households who pay income taxes.  This group consists of households earning roughly $30,000 to $50,000 who comprise more than one in five voters and voted overwhelmingly for Mr. Obama in the last election (57% to 42%).  Moreover, the fiscal cliff also restores the pre-stimulus social security payroll taxes of two percent of earnings. Altogether this means a household earning $40,000 would see a tax hike of nearly $2,000 beginning January 1, 2013.  High earning households will pay much more (just like its opponents claimed), but as a share of income, the repeal will clobber middle-income households.

I would personally like to see wholesale tax and entitlement reform. That means more revenue, but through a cap on loopholes and deductions, a lifetime limit on most entitlements along with later retirement age for young workers.  I am not betting on it though; I suspect we'll drive off the fiscal cliff, just like Thelma and Louise.

Link to this commentary: https://commentaries.cberdata.org/650/thelma-and-louise-approach-the-fiscal-cliff

Tags: budget and spending, economy, election, budget and spending, government, taxes


About the Author

Michael Hicks cberdirector@bsu.edu

Michael J. Hicks, PhD, is the director of the Center for Business and Economic Research and the George and Frances Ball distinguished professor of economics in the Miller College of Business at Ball State University. Note: The views expressed here are solely those of the author, and do not represent those of funders, associations, any entity of Ball State University, or its governing body.

© Center for Business and Economic Research, Ball State University

About Ball State CBER Data Center

Ball State CBER Data Center is one-stop shop for economic data including demographics, education, health, and social capital. Our easy-to-use, visual web tools offer data collection and analysis for grant writers, economic developers, policy makers, and the general public.

Ball State CBER Data Center (cberdata.org) is a product of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. CBER's mission is to conduct relevant and timely public policy research on a wide range of economic issues affecting the state and nation. Learn more.

Terms of Service

Center for Business and Economic Research

Ball State University • Whitinger Business Building, room 149
2000 W. University Ave.
Muncie, IN 47306-0360
Phone:
765-285-5926
Email:
cber@bsu.edu
Website:
www.bsu.edu/cber
Facebook:
www.facebook.com/BallStateCBER
Twitter:
www.twitter.com/BallStateCBER
Close