Center for Business and Economic Research - Ball State University


CBER Data Center
Projects and PublicationsEconomic IndicatorsWeekly CommentaryCommunity Asset InventoryManufacturing Scorecard

About

Commentaries are published weekly and distributed through the Indianapolis Business Journal and many other print and online publications. Disclaimer

RSS Feed

Disclaimer

The views expressed in these commentaries do not reflect those of Ball State University or the Center for Business and Economic Research.

Recent

Two Key Economic Lessons in One BillHoosiers face trade-offs and opportunity costs in the wake of SEA1.

Time to Fix Economic Development PolicyAllocating tax dollars to land development won’t cause economic growth.

The Unanticipated Effects of SB1Businesses, governments and households may all feel the effects.

The Stupidest of PoliciesThis whipsawing of tariff rates has unnerved financial markets, which on Wednesday, were toying with a liquidity crisis.

View archives

Top Tags

jobs and employment 261
economics 201
state and local government 188
education 186
economic development 171
indiana 171
budget and spending 145
taxes 144
law and public policy 142
workforce and human capital 139
Browse all tags
Reporter / Admin Login

March 15, 2010

Recession Slows with Costly Job Creation

One upshot of the recession is that will shine a light on two more or less competing explanations of what causes recessions. Small comfort this. While economists share broad agreement on a surprisingly large number of issues, the most visible discord lies in how two groups view the causes of recession, and hence how to remedy their effects. Both groups rely on sophisticated mathematical models. So, at the risk of enormous oversimplification, let me explain.

One camp views recessions as largely a market response to an unfortunate set of circumstances such as an energy price spike or financial crisis. While they’d agree that governmental action could prevent many of these events, once they do happen, there is little government can do. Markets may not give us the result we want, but they give us the best possible outcome.

The other group believes that recessions occur as a consequence of small imperfections in markets for goods and services. For example, restaurants cannot inexpensively change their menu prices, and so will absorb a small loss instead of cutting prices. Businesses will honor long term contracts, even when they might legally make small changes as commodity prices or demand for their goods changes. When these small effects are added together, the effect leads to a recession. As a result, government action, such as a Stimulus, might help edge an economy out of recession.

For the record, I belong to the second group. A modest amount of my empirical work, has documented these market imperfections. The columnist and Nobel Laureate Paul Krugman, and Clinton and Obama Administration luminaries Lawrence Summers and Christina Romer are leading advocates of this theory. So too is Harvard professor, and George W. Bush’s top economist, Greg Mankiw. This difference of opinion is not ideologically driven. Sadly economics isn’t quite that easy.

This recession might well make the truth more clear. That would be helpful because there is much doubt about the effect of government action to date. For example the Obama Administration estimates that it has resulted in about 2.1 million more jobs now than would be the case without it. Harvard’s Robert Barro, a leading researcher of the first group, estimates that the Stimulus has actually suppressed private investment, resulting in a net loss of jobs.

These are not easy things to reconcile, a simple accounting of jobs or glance at the unemployment rate will not do. It takes a model that accounts for at least dozens of complex interactions, calibrated on history and forward looking across an uncertain policy environment.

The unsettling truth is that for those of us who believed the Stimulus would significantly improve the economy face a daunting trial. You see, even if the Administration’s most optimistic estimate is right, those Stimulus jobs cost us a tad more than $400,000 apiece. Without an explosion of Stimulus related employment, the economic models supporting it are in trouble. One problem with them: none accounted for the huge uncertainty about public policies: health care, cap and trade, and the like now scaring employers.

Link to this commentary: https://commentaries.cberdata.org/22/recession-slows-with-costly-job-creation

Tags: jobs and employment, recession


About the Author

Michael Hicks cberdirector@bsu.edu

Michael J. Hicks, PhD, is the director of the Center for Business and Economic Research and the George and Frances Ball distinguished professor of economics in the Miller College of Business at Ball State University. Note: The views expressed here are solely those of the author, and do not represent those of funders, associations, any entity of Ball State University, or its governing body.

© Center for Business and Economic Research, Ball State University

About Ball State CBER Data Center

Ball State CBER Data Center is one-stop shop for economic data including demographics, education, health, and social capital. Our easy-to-use, visual web tools offer data collection and analysis for grant writers, economic developers, policy makers, and the general public.

Ball State CBER Data Center (cberdata.org) is a product of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. CBER's mission is to conduct relevant and timely public policy research on a wide range of economic issues affecting the state and nation. Learn more.

Terms of Service

Center for Business and Economic Research

Ball State University • Whitinger Business Building, room 149
2000 W. University Ave.
Muncie, IN 47306-0360
Phone:
765-285-5926
Email:
cber@bsu.edu
Website:
www.bsu.edu/cber
Facebook:
www.facebook.com/BallStateCBER
Twitter:
www.twitter.com/BallStateCBER
Close