Center for Business and Economic Research - Ball State University


CBER Data Center
Projects and PublicationsEconomic IndicatorsWeekly CommentaryCommunity Asset InventoryManufacturing Scorecard

About

Commentaries are published weekly and distributed through the Indianapolis Business Journal and many other print and online publications. Disclaimer

RSS Feed

Disclaimer

The views expressed in these commentaries do not reflect those of Ball State University or the Center for Business and Economic Research.

Recent

Previewing the Long-Term Effects of TariffsThe dominant effect of the Trump tariffs will be to raise production costs on almost every American manufacturing firm.

It’s TDS to Suppose These Tariffs Are WorkingTrump has pushed the U.S. into an economic downturn that will be especially hurtful to Hoosiers.

Trump’s Tariff Recession Is HereMy new forecast, completed in late April, predicts a national recession began as early as March in reaction to Trump’s tarriffs.

Two Key Economic Lessons in One BillHoosiers face trade-offs and opportunity costs in the wake of SEA1.

View archives

Top Tags

jobs and employment 262
economics 203
state and local government 188
education 186
indiana 173
economic development 171
taxes 146
budget and spending 145
law and public policy 144
workforce and human capital 139
Browse all tags
Reporter / Admin Login

January 24, 2016

The End of a Bubble, Version 2016

World financial and commodity markets are now poised for a fourth week of spasmodic turbulence. In constant dollar terms oil is nearly as cheap as it has ever been, while China faces the slowest economic growth of modern times. Here in the US, December retail sales growth was actually negative, marking an awful season. Then, stocks waited until the first trading day in January to plummet, fueling fury about stock manipulation in every conspiracy theorist and Bernie Sanders supporter.

On the face of it, this has many of the hallmarks of a recession. And it may be, but what if instead of a recession, what we see now are markets of all types returning to where they are supposed to be? That is the interesting question.

American labor markets are fairly strong in the limited sense that those who wish to work can find a job. Still, job growth and the productivity of American workers has been sufficiently slow to keep growth of the overall economy very modest. While the American economy is a bright spot in the world, our real economic growth is far too weak to support the rapid stock market gains of the past few years.

The doubling of the major American stock indices since 2009 would imply rapid and optimistic GDP growth. That has not been the experience of the U.S. economy. Thus the best value measures of our stocks suggest they remain heavily overvalued, even after the past few weeks. This suggests that the current stock market declines reflect a movement to reality, not recession.

The crash of commodities, including oil is mostly natural. A slowing economy needs fewer precious metals, steel and petroleum. But, not all these commodities are driven wholly by markets. Saudi Arabia and several other OPEC countries face an existential threat from Iran. OPEC’s continued interest in low oil prices is not about weakening American shale production, which is a minor profitability nuisance. It is all about crashing the Iranian economy and weakening its influence.

China’s economy faces a permanent slowing. Almost all growth in China over the past half century has come from moving peasants from subsistence farms to late 19th century factories. The country is running out of peasants, slowing even its unreliable official growth numbers. China remains a Marxist-Leninist nation, with poor economic prospects. Chinese citizens will be lucky to have the 2000 American standard of living in 2100, even if they peacefully abandon communism.

So what about the current economy? We should expect US equities to drop and commodities to remain low. This will continue to evaporate wealth, which will in turn slow major sectors of the economy such as retail sales, auto production and home construction. This is the unavoidable deflation of a bubble. The silver lining on appropriately priced stocks and much lower GDP growth may be that the US can once again pay attention to fundamentals; education, distortionary taxes and federal programs that disincentivize labor and investment. That is the economic debate of 2016.

Link to this commentary: https://commentaries.cberdata.org/822/the-end-of-a-bubble-version-2016

Tags: china, middle east, economy, foreign policy, finance


About the Author

Michael Hicks cberdirector@bsu.edu

Michael J. Hicks, PhD, is the director of the Center for Business and Economic Research and the George and Frances Ball distinguished professor of economics in the Miller College of Business at Ball State University. Note: The views expressed here are solely those of the author, and do not represent those of funders, associations, any entity of Ball State University, or its governing body.

© Center for Business and Economic Research, Ball State University

About Ball State CBER Data Center

Ball State CBER Data Center is one-stop shop for economic data including demographics, education, health, and social capital. Our easy-to-use, visual web tools offer data collection and analysis for grant writers, economic developers, policy makers, and the general public.

Ball State CBER Data Center (cberdata.org) is a product of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. CBER's mission is to conduct relevant and timely public policy research on a wide range of economic issues affecting the state and nation. Learn more.

Terms of Service

Center for Business and Economic Research

Ball State University • Whitinger Business Building, room 149
2000 W. University Ave.
Muncie, IN 47306-0360
Phone:
765-285-5926
Email:
cber@bsu.edu
Website:
www.bsu.edu/cber
Facebook:
www.facebook.com/BallStateCBER
Twitter:
www.twitter.com/BallStateCBER
Close