Center for Business and Economic Research - Ball State University


CBER Data Center
Projects and PublicationsEconomic IndicatorsWeekly CommentaryCommunity Asset InventoryManufacturing Scorecard

About

Commentaries are published weekly and distributed through the Indianapolis Business Journal and many other print and online publications. Disclaimer

RSS Feed

Disclaimer

The views expressed in these commentaries do not reflect those of Ball State University or the Center for Business and Economic Research.

Recent

Increasing Importance of Summer JobsThese jobs offer an opportunity to learn as well as earn money.

Educational Attainment, the 21st Century Fund and the Future of SchoolingIndiana ranks 42nd in educational attainment.

Big Savings for Ending Prevailing WageMy statistical models show that repealing state prevailing wage laws save taxpayers money.

Re-Thinking Economic Development A large share of the most mobile families—perhaps half—no longer need to live near where they work.

View archives

Top Tags

jobs and employment 231
economics 178
education 149
economic development 146
state and local government 129
taxes 123
finance 109
indiana 106
budget and spending 104
migration and population change 104
Browse all tags
Reporter / Admin Login

May 17, 2015

Are Low Interest Rates and Tax Abatements to Blame for Low Wage Growth?

Despite the continued tightening of labor markets, average wages are stalled at 1990s levels. This can only be partially explained by the Great Recession. Something else more worrisome is occurring. That trend and its causes are far more worrisome.

The flat average wages masks the underlying reality that highly educated folks have seen their incomes rise over that time, while poorly educated have seen them decline. Much of this may be tied to inevitable technological change that favors skilled workers over the unskilled. If so, the role of effective public policy will be limited to helping better educate workers. Alas, there are no limits to ineffective public policy. For this reason, is time to ask again whether or not public policy has played a role in speeding this technological adoption, and whether that has made our labor markets worse. Let me explain.

Businesses combine workers and equipment to provide goods or services. The price of the people is their wages and fringe benefits, and the price of the equipment is the cost of capital—primarily interest rates and taxes. People and machinery are what economists call “gross complements,” which is a jargon-esque way of saying that men and machines work together. So, more capital investment will tend to increase the demand for labor.

Over the long run, capital is a “gross complement” to labor, but individual capital investments and many new innovations are “substitutes” to labor. These substitutes replace expensive skills and expensive workers with machines, reducing the demand for labor in a particular factory or skill. Over the long run, we call this economic growth. Typically the change is sufficiently gradual that workers can adapt. But what if our public policies have mistakenly accelerated this change, making it so rapid that workers in large numbers had no time to learn new skills? That may be what is happening.

Since the run-up to the Y2K bug, interest rates have been kept very low, for very good reasons—potential computer problems, two recessions and wars. These lower interest rates have dramatically reduced the cost of capital, while the cost of labor and their fringe benefits rose. This means that the economy has been through a decade and a half of much reduced capital costs, while labor costs have risen. It would seem almost impossible that this would not have hastened the substitution of capital for labor.

At the state level, taxes on capital have been slashed. Indiana alone forgives taxes on more than $8 billion of new investment a year. As an aside, this means the reduction in local revenues of perhaps a billion dollars per year.

To be clear, we need business investment to grow, but hastening investment past the rate at which free markets would dictate is not necessarily a path to prosperity any more than raising the minimum wage to $20 an hour. For as long as wages have been stagnant, we have in place public policies that heavily favor capital over workers. It is time to question this approach. 

Link to this commentary: https://commentaries.cberdata.org/786/are-low-interest-rates-and-tax-abatements-to-blame-for-low-wage-growth

Tags: economic theory


About the Author

Michael Hicks cberdirector@bsu.edu

Michael J. Hicks, PhD, is the director of the Center for Business and Economic Research and the George and Frances Ball distinguished professor of economics in the Miller College of Business at Ball State University. Hicks earned doctoral and master’s degrees in economics from the University of Tennessee and a bachelor’s degree in economics from Virginia Military Institute. He has authored two books and more than 60 scholarly works focusing on state and local public policy, including tax and expenditure policy and the impact of Wal-Mart on local economies.

© Center for Business and Economic Research, Ball State University

About Ball State CBER Data Center

Ball State CBER Data Center is one-stop shop for economic data including demographics, education, health, and social capital. Our easy-to-use, visual web tools offer data collection and analysis for grant writers, economic developers, policy makers, and the general public.

Ball State CBER Data Center (cberdata.org) is a product of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. CBER's mission is to conduct relevant and timely public policy research on a wide range of economic issues affecting the state and nation. Learn more.

Terms of Service

Center for Business and Economic Research

Ball State University • Whitinger Business Building, room 149
2000 W. University Ave.
Muncie, IN 47306-0360
Phone:
765-285-5926
Email:
cber@bsu.edu
Website:
www.bsu.edu/cber
Facebook:
www.facebook.com/BallStateCBER
Twitter:
www.twitter.com/BallStateCBER
Close