Center for Business and Economic Research - Ball State University


CBER Data Center
Projects and PublicationsEconomic IndicatorsWeekly CommentaryCommunity Asset InventoryManufacturing Scorecard

About

Commentaries are published weekly and distributed through the Indianapolis Business Journal and many other print and online publications. Disclaimer

RSS Feed

Disclaimer

The views expressed in these commentaries do not reflect those of Ball State University or the Center for Business and Economic Research.

Recent

Two Key Economic Lessons in One BillHoosiers face trade-offs and opportunity costs in the wake of SEA1.

Time to Fix Economic Development PolicyAllocating tax dollars to land development won’t cause economic growth.

The Unanticipated Effects of SB1Businesses, governments and households may all feel the effects.

The Stupidest of PoliciesThis whipsawing of tariff rates has unnerved financial markets, which on Wednesday, were toying with a liquidity crisis.

View archives

Top Tags

jobs and employment 261
economics 201
state and local government 188
education 186
economic development 171
indiana 171
budget and spending 145
taxes 144
law and public policy 142
workforce and human capital 139
Browse all tags
Reporter / Admin Login

April 5, 2015

RFRA Impact Is Worse Than Economic

The disingenuously named Religious Freedom Restoration Act has generated a great deal of well-deserved calumny by Hoosier businesses. They argue that it weakens the state's economy and point to business relocation, tourism and the ability to attract talent to the state as the chief victims of this unpopular law. I fear it is far worse than that.

Indiana has a $300 billion economy and the actual boycott, which looks to be primarily in travel, probably runs into the tens of thousands of dollars. Business relocation to our state is likewise overhyped, never amounting to 5 percent of new jobs. Moreover, the only deal we have clearly lost is the chance to pony up $20 million in incentives to the perennially unprofitable Angie's List. These effects will be immeasurably small, especially because the boycott and political pressures will force Indiana to make real changes in RFRA. The real damage is elsewhere.

The injury to Indiana’s reputation will be harder to fix. The chief problem is that we are now forced to defend something that didn't need defending; the goodwill, tolerance and hospitality of Hoosiers. Still, the real consequences of the RFRA act lie elsewhere than the measured economy; they involve trust between people and government.

A free economy relies almost wholly upon trust. Without trust, contracts are meaningless scraps of paper and trade comes to a grinding halt. The RFRA is exactly the type of legislation that erodes trust between businesses and households. It is simply not possible to legislate the details of the inevitable tensions between culture and faith. This law divides us unnecessarily, corrodes the public discourse and lessens trust between Hoosiers of goodwill, whatever their opinions.

Second, when it is all said and done we will have wasted perhaps a quarter of this legislative session on this law and its aftermath. We actually have serious, long-term problems in Indiana that will remain unaddressed as a consequence of this. So, trust in our leadership is needlessly and deeply weakened.

Of course the law defenders will say that it has been mischaracterized by a liberal media. Maybe so, but in truth, this law is so confusing that its authors cannot agree on its purpose. Nor can they explain it clearly to a national audience. As a consequence Indiana openly invites the ridicule and derision of a skeptical public. The bottom line is this: If you cannot explain your own laws effectively, don’t complain of others do so for you.

What is most saddening is not the erosion of trust or greater burden placed on business, but the absolute lack of purpose in RFRA. Religious freedom is alive and well in Indiana. That which is not at risk does not need restoration. Worse still, both sides are busy contriving false victims and martyrs. We need to more aggressively and courageously avoid being distracted by those who would dishonestly divide us. I pray that this debacle gives stronger voice to those leaders who argued against this folly.

Link to this commentary: https://commentaries.cberdata.org/780/rfra-impact-is-worse-than-economic

Tags: gov. pence administration, politics, indiana, law and public policy, economy


About the Author

Michael Hicks cberdirector@bsu.edu

Michael J. Hicks, PhD, is the director of the Center for Business and Economic Research and the George and Frances Ball distinguished professor of economics in the Miller College of Business at Ball State University. Note: The views expressed here are solely those of the author, and do not represent those of funders, associations, any entity of Ball State University, or its governing body.

© Center for Business and Economic Research, Ball State University

About Ball State CBER Data Center

Ball State CBER Data Center is one-stop shop for economic data including demographics, education, health, and social capital. Our easy-to-use, visual web tools offer data collection and analysis for grant writers, economic developers, policy makers, and the general public.

Ball State CBER Data Center (cberdata.org) is a product of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. CBER's mission is to conduct relevant and timely public policy research on a wide range of economic issues affecting the state and nation. Learn more.

Terms of Service

Center for Business and Economic Research

Ball State University • Whitinger Business Building, room 149
2000 W. University Ave.
Muncie, IN 47306-0360
Phone:
765-285-5926
Email:
cber@bsu.edu
Website:
www.bsu.edu/cber
Facebook:
www.facebook.com/BallStateCBER
Twitter:
www.twitter.com/BallStateCBER
Close