Center for Business and Economic Research - Ball State University


CBER Data Center
Projects and PublicationsEconomic IndicatorsWeekly CommentaryCommunity Asset InventoryManufacturing Scorecard

About

Commentaries are published weekly and distributed through the Indianapolis Business Journal and many other print and online publications. Disclaimer

RSS Feed

Disclaimer

The views expressed in these commentaries do not reflect those of Ball State University or the Center for Business and Economic Research.

Recent

It’s TDS to Suppose These Tariffs Are WorkingTrump has pushed the U.S. into an economic downturn that will be especially hurtful to Hoosiers.

Trump’s Tariff Recession Is HereMy new forecast, completed in late April, predicts a national recession began as early as March in reaction to Trump’s tarriffs.

Two Key Economic Lessons in One BillHoosiers face trade-offs and opportunity costs in the wake of SEA1.

Time to Fix Economic Development PolicyAllocating tax dollars to land development won’t cause economic growth.

View archives

Top Tags

jobs and employment 262
economics 203
state and local government 188
education 186
indiana 173
economic development 171
taxes 146
budget and spending 145
law and public policy 144
workforce and human capital 139
Browse all tags
Reporter / Admin Login

November 3, 2013

A New Minimum Wage Debate

The minimum wage is once again in the news, here in Indiana and in many places around the nation. Much of the rhetoric about the costs and benefits of the minimum wage is pure bunk, so policymakers, business leaders and citizens have use for some honest discussion of the matter. There are four major points to be made.

First, life as an adult minimum wage worker is tough, but not because of salaries. About one in 100 adults aged 25 or older in the labor force is a true minimum wage worker. By comparison, about 15 of every 100 adults in the labor force are functionally illiterate, eight have not graduated high school, a half dozen are mentally ill and another half dozen chronically abuse drugs or alcohol. There is some overlap here, but I otherwise choose the most conservative estimates. So, an adult working at minimum wage shows special signs of labor market disfavor. These are people who need vast amounts of both public and private help, but it is not labor markets that are to blame.

Economic theory is unambiguous about the effect of the minimum wage, and every textbook tells the same story. Any time the minimum wage is set lower than the going wage for unskilled work, there is no effect. Anytime the minimum wage is set above the going wage, some workers lose jobs. Unsurprisingly, empirical studies of minimum wage laws report both effects. Fortunately, most minimum wage increases lag far behind the going wage for unskilled work. When it exceeds that, as it did during the last series of increases during the Great Depression, people lose jobs. The most common losers are workers in places with a high supply of workers or in places with low demand for their services. That means urban and rural poor, mostly teens, bear the job loss burden of minimum wages.

Efforts to fix labor markets sometimes call for raising the minimum wage, but no one should mistake this for concern for workers. The minimum wage debate is all about empowering the unions who seem to have forgotten how to actually attract workers. That is why the movement is at death's door.

If we really wanted to help minimum wage workers, we could do better. First, we could adopt a training wage, say, an hourly rate of $6, that businesses could pay young workers for up to 90 days. Job experience is the best source of employment skills for those who lack them. Second, we could usher more uneducated kids back into school. Public assistance or unemployment payments to men and women without a high school diploma should be contingent to their going back to school. The stimulus bill waived that requirement for TANF recipients and softened the rules for unemployment compensation. Finally, we could increase earned income tax credit for the very poorest workers.

The depression-era New Deal paid people to work, but the Stimulus Bill paid people not to work. A minimum wage increase will only get less work and weaker labor markets. It is a bad idea.

Link to this commentary: https://commentaries.cberdata.org/702/a-new-minimum-wage-debate

Tags: business, cost of living, jobs and employment, people


About the Author

Michael Hicks cberdirector@bsu.edu

Michael J. Hicks, PhD, is the director of the Center for Business and Economic Research and the George and Frances Ball distinguished professor of economics in the Miller College of Business at Ball State University. Note: The views expressed here are solely those of the author, and do not represent those of funders, associations, any entity of Ball State University, or its governing body.

© Center for Business and Economic Research, Ball State University

About Ball State CBER Data Center

Ball State CBER Data Center is one-stop shop for economic data including demographics, education, health, and social capital. Our easy-to-use, visual web tools offer data collection and analysis for grant writers, economic developers, policy makers, and the general public.

Ball State CBER Data Center (cberdata.org) is a product of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. CBER's mission is to conduct relevant and timely public policy research on a wide range of economic issues affecting the state and nation. Learn more.

Terms of Service

Center for Business and Economic Research

Ball State University • Whitinger Business Building, room 149
2000 W. University Ave.
Muncie, IN 47306-0360
Phone:
765-285-5926
Email:
cber@bsu.edu
Website:
www.bsu.edu/cber
Facebook:
www.facebook.com/BallStateCBER
Twitter:
www.twitter.com/BallStateCBER
Close