Center for Business and Economic Research - Ball State University


CBER Data Center
Projects and PublicationsEconomic IndicatorsWeekly CommentaryCommunity Asset InventoryManufacturing Scorecard

About

Commentaries are published weekly and distributed through the Indianapolis Business Journal and many other print and online publications. Disclaimer

RSS Feed

Disclaimer

The views expressed in these commentaries do not reflect those of Ball State University or the Center for Business and Economic Research.

Recent

Trump’s Tariff Recession Is HereMy new forecast, completed in late April, predicts a national recession began as early as March in reaction to Trump’s tarriffs.

Two Key Economic Lessons in One BillHoosiers face trade-offs and opportunity costs in the wake of SEA1.

Time to Fix Economic Development PolicyAllocating tax dollars to land development won’t cause economic growth.

The Unanticipated Effects of SB1Businesses, governments and households may all feel the effects.

View archives

Top Tags

jobs and employment 261
economics 202
state and local government 188
education 186
indiana 172
economic development 171
taxes 145
budget and spending 145
law and public policy 143
workforce and human capital 139
Browse all tags
Reporter / Admin Login

October 28, 2012

More Clarity on Gender and Pay

No observer of the presidential debates will have found the discussion about pay and gender satisfying.  At best it was stumbling and, to be honest, I find much of the talk condescending towards women who make difficult career and family choices in full knowledge of the costs and benefits. In short, the matter needs some clarification.

With regard to the data there's little debate. The average working woman, in 2010, earned 81 percent of the average working man. Likewise, there's no debate that the gap is closing, especially for younger women, for whom the current gap is under 5 percent. These are the data, and by themselves offer no cause or understanding of the issue, much less an explanation of potential policy interventions. For that we need to analyze the data, a step much feared by demagogues.

Studies of the gender gap are typically performed using a statistical model that estimates how various factors, such a schooling, occupation, hours worked, age, time on the job, gender and unexplained factors predict wages.  It should not be surprising that the majority of wage differences between men and women can be explained by schooling, occupational choice, and experience.  Early studies showed that gender and unexplained factors explained about half the wage gap. We cannot measure discrimination, but this is a pretty good proxy.  However, over time, the best research points to an evaporation of unexplained factors, and a small (perhaps 2 to 5 percent, sometimes zero) wage gap attributable to gender. These issues are as well understood as the links between smoking and cancer (with clearer statistical inference), and roughly of the same vintage.  So why then does the issue still offer such misdiagnosis among political discourse? 

Surely election year politics and a philistine electoral base play some part in this tactic. It is of course banal to note that sexism is unworthy of a great republic, yet it still haunts us, even as the best research points to its shrinking influence.  I think that in the flurry to score electoral points, most politicians have missed the bigger point, or at least spelled it out clumsily.  Here's why.

Today a disproportionate share of college students are young women.  So, policies to force equal pay come at a time when markets will have finally adjusted (it only took a lifetime).  Moreover, what is creating differences in salary isn't primarily discrimination, rather it is women choosing occupations that are flexible enough to accommodate child birth and its associated duties.  These occupations often pay less, which is quite natural given higher non-wage benefits.

So, big financial gains for women (and their families) would come by introducing young women to a wider variety of occupations.  We can urge businesses to be more flexible, but that won’t always be possible.  Of course, there's no sweeping legislative agenda for a candidate to claim credit.  It is a good bit harder than that, resting as it does on how we teach our sons and daughters to prepare for life.

Link to this commentary: https://commentaries.cberdata.org/647/more-clarity-on-gender-and-pay

Tags: economy, jobs and employment, income and wages, politics, election, insurance and worker benefits


About the Author

Michael Hicks cberdirector@bsu.edu

Michael J. Hicks, PhD, is the director of the Center for Business and Economic Research and the George and Frances Ball distinguished professor of economics in the Miller College of Business at Ball State University. Note: The views expressed here are solely those of the author, and do not represent those of funders, associations, any entity of Ball State University, or its governing body.

© Center for Business and Economic Research, Ball State University

About Ball State CBER Data Center

Ball State CBER Data Center is one-stop shop for economic data including demographics, education, health, and social capital. Our easy-to-use, visual web tools offer data collection and analysis for grant writers, economic developers, policy makers, and the general public.

Ball State CBER Data Center (cberdata.org) is a product of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. CBER's mission is to conduct relevant and timely public policy research on a wide range of economic issues affecting the state and nation. Learn more.

Terms of Service

Center for Business and Economic Research

Ball State University • Whitinger Business Building, room 149
2000 W. University Ave.
Muncie, IN 47306-0360
Phone:
765-285-5926
Email:
cber@bsu.edu
Website:
www.bsu.edu/cber
Facebook:
www.facebook.com/BallStateCBER
Twitter:
www.twitter.com/BallStateCBER
Close