September 2, 2012
Labor Day and the Transformation of Unions
This week my third grader asked me what Labor Day was all about. I told him it was a chance to visit Grandma and sample some peach pie—both sufficient reasons for a holiday. The realities of Labor Day are a more complicated affair. What I didn't tell him was that in this column, on a sunny Labor Day five years past, I asserted that the American labor movement was dead. Given what has transpired, it would appear my diagnosis was a bit optimistic.
On this weekend it might be good to focus on what has become of the labor movement that once meant so much to America. To begin, I have to clarify that I have neither love nor antipathy for unions. They are simply a social movement to be studied and I assume they are filled with men and women of good will and bad will in equal proportion to the population as a whole.
For a long time, three-quarters of a century perhaps, industrial unions made an important difference in national policy. It is almost banal to recount many of the things about the workplace that we now take for granted were championed for by unions. For a long time too, the big American unions were solidly democratic (with a small d, as in democracy). It is no accident that we celebrate a day to recognize labor in September, not on May 1st, the traditional holiday of socialist movements.
Over the past three decades, much has changed. The American union movement has lost membership faster than any mainstream group in our national history. Today, about one in 18 workers in the private sector belong to a union, down from more than one in three when I was a boy. In contrast, more than one in three government workers are now in unions. This decline came at the tail end of a long string of policy successes, but it also came at a time when unions began providing huge financial support to one political party, most recently a whopping $400 million spent in the 2008 election. They went from being small d, to big D, Democrats.
This asymmetry of financial support accompanied an overall shift in policy focus. The American labor movement is no longer about workers wrestling with companies for a share of revenues. The American labor movement today is animated by an effort to wrest from taxpayers every available dollar. This has pushed hundreds of cities and several states to the edge of bankruptcy. It has also enriched union leaders. For example, the Indiana State Teachers Association has a slew of folks making over $200,000 a year.
Now, I want to be quick to add that I don’t think ISTA leadership is overpaid. After all, these folks have to argue with straight-faced composure that Indiana teachers ought not to receive annual performance evaluations like the rest of us. That is six-figure brass. This is what Labor Day has turned into, and is why so many American taxpayers will focus on something else this year.
About the Author
Recent
The Legacy of Eric Holcomb’s AdministrationIndiana’s economy is better than it was when Holcomb took office, but there are some caveats.
School Choice Is a Good, Not Great Thing… Sort ofThe benefits are overestimated and misunderstood.
Indiana’s Commission on Higher Education Issues an Eye-Opening ReportOur current level of educational attainment and college attendance rates puts us squarely in the bottom 10 states and territories.
Sorting and Policy DivergenceWithout room for state-level differences in what it meant to be a Republican or Democrat, states began to align with national politics.
View archives