Center for Business and Economic Research - Ball State University


CBER Data Center
Projects and PublicationsEconomic IndicatorsWeekly CommentaryCommunity Asset InventoryManufacturing Scorecard

About

Commentaries are published weekly and distributed through the Indianapolis Business Journal and many other print and online publications. Disclaimer

RSS Feed

Disclaimer

The views expressed in these commentaries do not reflect those of Ball State University or the Center for Business and Economic Research.

Recent

Bank Failures Warn of Deeper Economic ProblemsDuring the Great Recession, a whopping 0.014 percent of banks were closed by the FDIC.

Remote Work Through the Eyes of Three 20-SomethingsRemote work is here to stay.

Remote Work and Labor MarketsThere are more remote workers today than there are immigrants in the U.S.

The Amish in IndianaIt is hard not to draw similarities between the Amish and newer immigrant groups.

View archives

Top Tags

jobs and employment 228
economics 176
education 146
economic development 144
state and local government 124
taxes 122
finance 108
recession 100
budget and spending 100
indiana 99
Browse all tags
Reporter / Admin Login

February 20, 2012

Markets and Growth

Markets have no role in determining happiness, love or whether or not our lives have meaning. They do, however, determine wages and income, and the price of goods.   Like it or not, that is truth, and warrants a lesson on how it works.

Businesses combine people, machinery, raw materials and management expertise to make things. Economists call these inputs to production. The demand by businesses for each of these items is dependent upon how much value each input brings to the production of the good or service the business sells. In turn, businesses engage in the sale of these products or services in another market.  Most businesses have only minimal choice in the price of their goods.  If they enjoy some monopoly power—for example, the Big Three auto makers, circa 1960—then they can realize above market prices.  This is good for the workers, management and capital owners, of course, but bad for consumers (that is another story).  The essence of the demand side of markets is that the limit to how much income goes to workers, the owners of the machinery and land; and management is determined by how valuable each is to the production of the good. 

Supply matters also.  The supply for machinery is global, the rest is more local.  If there are very few workers of a particular type, then these workers will obtain wages up to the full value they bring to the production process.  If there is an abundance of a particular type of worker, they will get less. 

Markets rule supreme, but they also work imperfectly and will do so as long as humans themselves remain imperfect. Workers obtain the wrong skills (38 percent of last years’ graduates with a Ph.D. in history are unemployed).  Businesses make products few consumers want (see Volt, Chevrolet) and governments try to manipulate products and pricing (see again Volt, Chevrolet).  Businesses mistake the value of a CEO, star player or shift operator.  The rich imperfection of markets does not mean that one can wish them away any more than a paratrooper can wish away gravity.  Further, these types of market failures tend to self-correct in time.

Despite the rhetoric of the day, the wage share of income in the U.S. has remained trendless at 75-80 percent of total commerce for several decades.  Profits have dropped as a share of production for 40 years, while payments to owners of machinery and land have risen, as has the share the government collects.  

The ineluctable truth is that the only ways to alter the outcome of this equation is for individual inputs to become more productive or to have government redistribute income. Redistributing income is something every society does, and today, roughly one in four households are recipients of this redistribution. Redistributing income changes the share everyone gets, but does not make the economy larger.  Alternatively, boosting the productivity of land, machinery and workers will increase their incomes, even if the share does not change. This process is called simply ‘Economic Growth.’

Link to this commentary: https://commentaries.cberdata.org/610/markets-and-growth

Tags: business, manufacturing


About the Author

Michael Hicks cberdirector@bsu.edu

Michael J. Hicks, PhD, is the director of the Center for Business and Economic Research and the George and Frances Ball distinguished professor of economics in the Miller College of Business at Ball State University. Hicks earned doctoral and master’s degrees in economics from the University of Tennessee and a bachelor’s degree in economics from Virginia Military Institute. He has authored two books and more than 60 scholarly works focusing on state and local public policy, including tax and expenditure policy and the impact of Wal-Mart on local economies.

© Center for Business and Economic Research, Ball State University

About Ball State CBER Data Center

Ball State CBER Data Center is one-stop shop for economic data including demographics, education, health, and social capital. Our easy-to-use, visual web tools offer data collection and analysis for grant writers, economic developers, policy makers, and the general public.

Ball State CBER Data Center (cberdata.org) is a product of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. CBER's mission is to conduct relevant and timely public policy research on a wide range of economic issues affecting the state and nation. Learn more.

Terms of Service

Center for Business and Economic Research

Ball State University • Whitinger Business Building, room 149
2000 W. University Ave.
Muncie, IN 47306-0360
Phone:
765-285-5926
Email:
cber@bsu.edu
Website:
www.bsu.edu/cber
Facebook:
www.facebook.com/BallStateCBER
Twitter:
www.twitter.com/BallStateCBER
Close