Center for Business and Economic Research - Ball State University


CBER Data Center
Projects and PublicationsEconomic IndicatorsWeekly CommentaryCommunity Asset InventoryManufacturing Scorecard

About

Commentaries are published weekly and distributed through the Indianapolis Business Journal and many other print and online publications. Disclaimer

RSS Feed

Disclaimer

The views expressed in these commentaries do not reflect those of Ball State University or the Center for Business and Economic Research.

Recent

Two Key Economic Lessons in One BillHoosiers face trade-offs and opportunity costs in the wake of SEA1.

Time to Fix Economic Development PolicyAllocating tax dollars to land development won’t cause economic growth.

The Unanticipated Effects of SB1Businesses, governments and households may all feel the effects.

The Stupidest of PoliciesThis whipsawing of tariff rates has unnerved financial markets, which on Wednesday, were toying with a liquidity crisis.

View archives

Top Tags

jobs and employment 261
economics 201
state and local government 188
education 186
economic development 171
indiana 171
budget and spending 145
taxes 144
law and public policy 142
workforce and human capital 139
Browse all tags
Reporter / Admin Login

July 4, 2011

Immigration and the Declaration of Independence

When I graduated from college, I was handed two documents, a diploma and a commission as a 2nd Lieutenant in the Army.  This is a common enough experience, but interestingly enough, both documents contained two dates.  The first was the common day and year the second was the quaint inscription “. . . and of the Independence of the United States of America the 208th.”  This dates your columnist.  It also reminds us that our independence represented a break in history which was so mightily pregnant with hope and the promise of liberty that it was widely viewed as an event from which later generations should begin their accounting of time.  

In many ways the U.S. Constitution has replaced the Declaration of Independence as our prime source of intellectual support for nationhood.  That is appropriate of course, but some key tenets of the declaration bear mentioning in these times.  It is unsurprising that of particular interest to me are the parts that bear directly on economic policy of our nation.  These are embodied in that distinguished part of the declaration that explained why the colonies sought freedom.  It was an invective against the policies of King George III that Mr. Jefferson ”submitted to a candid world.”

 The first of the complaints was the king’s refusal to acknowledge laws that were “wholesome and necessary for the public good.”  The long lapse in acknowledging local power by the king and his parliament bred into the American psyche a thirst for local government control.  This idea continues to animate our federal system.  The signers of the declaration also listed the imposition of taxes without consent and for cutting off of free trade from other parts of the world.   This is the material of a good public policy discussion today.

Most astonishingly though, before Mr. Jefferson turned his pen to a discussion of taxes and the forced quartering of soldiers in private homes, and before he complained of about the king’s forces plundering and burning towns, the muse of our democracy wrote about immigration policy.

The signers of the Declaration of Independence deplored King George for having “endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither.”  This phrase requires a bit of explanation. Here the word ‘population’ is rendered as verb.  Today we would say that the king had prevented the states from recruiting new colonists and making them citizens. These words of our declaration provide a cold bath to my fellow citizens who oppose immigration or laws which fail to encourage “their migrations hither.” 

It is well that patriots who recall the founding principles of the republic keep this one in mind, for it would be ironic if the Tea Party were to ignore so fully the words of our Declaration of Independence and so place themselves on the wrong side of history while firmly aligning their policies with those of King George III.

Link to this commentary: https://commentaries.cberdata.org/576/immigration-and-the-declaration-of-independence

Tags: immigration, independence


About the Author

Michael Hicks cberdirector@bsu.edu

Michael J. Hicks, PhD, is the director of the Center for Business and Economic Research and the George and Frances Ball distinguished professor of economics in the Miller College of Business at Ball State University. Note: The views expressed here are solely those of the author, and do not represent those of funders, associations, any entity of Ball State University, or its governing body.

© Center for Business and Economic Research, Ball State University

About Ball State CBER Data Center

Ball State CBER Data Center is one-stop shop for economic data including demographics, education, health, and social capital. Our easy-to-use, visual web tools offer data collection and analysis for grant writers, economic developers, policy makers, and the general public.

Ball State CBER Data Center (cberdata.org) is a product of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. CBER's mission is to conduct relevant and timely public policy research on a wide range of economic issues affecting the state and nation. Learn more.

Terms of Service

Center for Business and Economic Research

Ball State University • Whitinger Business Building, room 149
2000 W. University Ave.
Muncie, IN 47306-0360
Phone:
765-285-5926
Email:
cber@bsu.edu
Website:
www.bsu.edu/cber
Facebook:
www.facebook.com/BallStateCBER
Twitter:
www.twitter.com/BallStateCBER
Close