Center for Business and Economic Research - Ball State University


CBER Data Center
Projects and PublicationsEconomic IndicatorsWeekly CommentaryCommunity Asset InventoryManufacturing Scorecard

About

Commentaries are published weekly and distributed through the Indianapolis Business Journal and many other print and online publications. Disclaimer

RSS Feed

Disclaimer

The views expressed in these commentaries do not reflect those of Ball State University or the Center for Business and Economic Research.

Recent

Previewing the Long-Term Effects of TariffsThe dominant effect of the Trump tariffs will be to raise production costs on almost every American manufacturing firm.

It’s TDS to Suppose These Tariffs Are WorkingTrump has pushed the U.S. into an economic downturn that will be especially hurtful to Hoosiers.

Trump’s Tariff Recession Is HereMy new forecast, completed in late April, predicts a national recession began as early as March in reaction to Trump’s tarriffs.

Two Key Economic Lessons in One BillHoosiers face trade-offs and opportunity costs in the wake of SEA1.

View archives

Top Tags

jobs and employment 262
economics 203
state and local government 188
education 186
indiana 173
economic development 171
taxes 146
budget and spending 145
law and public policy 144
workforce and human capital 139
Browse all tags
Reporter / Admin Login

January 31, 2011

Budget Realities and the State of the Union

The State of the Union address offers an insight into the budget and policy battles that animate the coming year.  I watched it with my 6th grade daughter, who despite growing annoyance with the frequency of applause, was surprised by the number of times the president mentioned the future.  I was struck by the way President Obama got it exactly right in identifying our long term problems – innovation and productivity.

In past speeches, he spent much time talking about how to slice our economic pie differently.  In this speech he talked about making it bigger.  If he follows through with action, this is a monumental shift in focus that his friends on the left will find discomfiting. 

Like the president, I am very optimistic about the future.  Also, like many others of our generation, I am inspired by the things a good and solvent government can do.  I recognize that many things we collectively want won’t always emerge in free markets.  Our federal government can do and does embark on great ventures.  I am not alarmed by big dreams, even if I am skeptical. 

What worried me most about the president’s speech was not what he said, but what he didn’t. The president’s budget proposals barely recognized the straightened federal budget circumstances that will continue to afflict the nation for at least a decade.  A budget freeze and earmark ban is both simpleminded and trivial.  These things divert our attention from the real heart of the matter.  It’s like putting a nice coat of wax on a Vega.  While everyone is appalled at the size of the federal budget, that’s not really the problem.  The real predicament is the scope of government.   If we can get a handle on what government should do, and more importantly, should not do, we can begin to right our budget.  Even so, it will take big cuts for a long time.  Immediately we are going to have to make significant cuts to such things as Medicaid and engineer long-term adjustments to Medicare and Social Security.  Most of us are going to have to be more responsible for our own futures. It will mean far less defense spending on big ticket items and a network of high speed rail will have to be left for another generation; we cannot now afford it.  

We also have to fix our tax system – income, corporate and payroll.  For some, that will mean more taxes; for most, less.  We will have to have a tax system that has low rates on a broad base – the real definition of fairness. 

Sadly, though his diagnosis was right, the president’s prescription offers too much of the wrong medicine.  This year alone, our government increased our debt by $9,200 for every household.  Talk of innovation and productivity is encouraging, but the best way to out-innovate the world in the short run is to simply get out of the way of entrepreneurs, innovators and producers.  We have to start by reducing their debt burden.

Link to this commentary: https://commentaries.cberdata.org/552/budget-realities-and-the-state-of-the-union

Tags: budget and spending, innovation


About the Author

Michael Hicks cberdirector@bsu.edu

Michael J. Hicks, PhD, is the director of the Center for Business and Economic Research and the George and Frances Ball distinguished professor of economics in the Miller College of Business at Ball State University. Note: The views expressed here are solely those of the author, and do not represent those of funders, associations, any entity of Ball State University, or its governing body.

© Center for Business and Economic Research, Ball State University

About Ball State CBER Data Center

Ball State CBER Data Center is one-stop shop for economic data including demographics, education, health, and social capital. Our easy-to-use, visual web tools offer data collection and analysis for grant writers, economic developers, policy makers, and the general public.

Ball State CBER Data Center (cberdata.org) is a product of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. CBER's mission is to conduct relevant and timely public policy research on a wide range of economic issues affecting the state and nation. Learn more.

Terms of Service

Center for Business and Economic Research

Ball State University • Whitinger Business Building, room 149
2000 W. University Ave.
Muncie, IN 47306-0360
Phone:
765-285-5926
Email:
cber@bsu.edu
Website:
www.bsu.edu/cber
Facebook:
www.facebook.com/BallStateCBER
Twitter:
www.twitter.com/BallStateCBER
Close