Center for Business and Economic Research - Ball State University


CBER Data Center
Projects and PublicationsEconomic IndicatorsWeekly CommentaryCommunity Asset InventoryManufacturing Scorecard

About

Commentaries are published weekly and distributed through the Indianapolis Business Journal and many other print and online publications. Disclaimer

RSS Feed

Disclaimer

The views expressed in these commentaries do not reflect those of Ball State University or the Center for Business and Economic Research.

Recent

Two Key Economic Lessons in One BillHoosiers face trade-offs and opportunity costs in the wake of SEA1.

Time to Fix Economic Development PolicyAllocating tax dollars to land development won’t cause economic growth.

The Unanticipated Effects of SB1Businesses, governments and households may all feel the effects.

The Stupidest of PoliciesThis whipsawing of tariff rates has unnerved financial markets, which on Wednesday, were toying with a liquidity crisis.

View archives

Top Tags

jobs and employment 261
economics 201
state and local government 188
education 186
economic development 171
indiana 171
budget and spending 145
taxes 144
law and public policy 142
workforce and human capital 139
Browse all tags
Reporter / Admin Login

September 13, 2010

The Coming Tax Debate

In the coming months we face an important and difficult debate on Federal income taxes. It is more than simply a matter of revenues and economic growth; it is also a debate about the politics of taxation.

I begin with some facts. Higher taxes slow the economy and reduce employment. The only question is ‘how big’ is the tradeoff between a tax increase and a smaller economy? Secondly, the US Federal income tax has long been a progressive income tax – high income taxpayers pay a higher proportion of their income than low income taxpayers. However, to the surprise of many, the so-called Bush tax cuts of 2001 and 2002 actually made the system more progressive than what we experienced in the Clinton years. While the Bush tax cut reduced taxes on the very rich by 5 percent, it was a 100 percent tax cut for about one quarter of households. Finally, a big chunk of income tax payers aren’t households, but small businesses representing half of all ‘high income’ taxpayers. These facts cry out for a bit of interpretation.

While tax cuts tend to make the economy grow – sometimes briskly – the effect can be entirely offset if it is accompanied by a large budget deficit or if the government spends its money on unproductive things. Unless you’ve recently awakened from a Rip Van Winkle-ish slumber, it hardly bears noting that the last decade has seen more than its share of deficits and unproductive spending.

So what does this mean for the tax debate?

The economy grows with agonizing slowness, and so a tax increase that will accompany the expiration of the Bush tax cuts this January will further slow the economy, perhaps deeply. More to the point, it will overwhelmingly affect small businesses on which everyone pins their hopes for new jobs. But that isn’t really why it is shaping up to be a huge political fight.

Repealing the Bush tax cuts and their big cuts for the ‘rich’ comprised an important part of a winning election campaign in 2008. Abandoning that mantra will be painful, but sticking to it might well be political suicide. Note again that many of the ‘rich’ are really ‘small businesses’ owned my middle class folks. An even more delicate truth is that the Bush tax cuts entirely eliminated income taxes for the poorest 25 percent of taxpayers (the poorest 25 percent of households have never paid income taxes). So today, about half of all American households pay no income taxes. Starting this January that changes; but it won’t become starkly obvious until April 15, 2012 – months before the next presidential election.

Supporters of the Bush tax cuts are also in a bind. Many now view the complete elimination of income taxes on half of households a bad lesson in civic responsibility. For them, any compromise short of a long extension of the tax cuts is bad policy and politics. This debate will soon rage and all the while the deficit grows, the economy lags, confidence wanes and an election looms.

Link to this commentary: https://commentaries.cberdata.org/529/the-coming-tax-debate

Tags: taxes, economy


About the Author

Michael Hicks cberdirector@bsu.edu

Michael J. Hicks, PhD, is the director of the Center for Business and Economic Research and the George and Frances Ball distinguished professor of economics in the Miller College of Business at Ball State University. Note: The views expressed here are solely those of the author, and do not represent those of funders, associations, any entity of Ball State University, or its governing body.

© Center for Business and Economic Research, Ball State University

About Ball State CBER Data Center

Ball State CBER Data Center is one-stop shop for economic data including demographics, education, health, and social capital. Our easy-to-use, visual web tools offer data collection and analysis for grant writers, economic developers, policy makers, and the general public.

Ball State CBER Data Center (cberdata.org) is a product of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. CBER's mission is to conduct relevant and timely public policy research on a wide range of economic issues affecting the state and nation. Learn more.

Terms of Service

Center for Business and Economic Research

Ball State University • Whitinger Business Building, room 149
2000 W. University Ave.
Muncie, IN 47306-0360
Phone:
765-285-5926
Email:
cber@bsu.edu
Website:
www.bsu.edu/cber
Facebook:
www.facebook.com/BallStateCBER
Twitter:
www.twitter.com/BallStateCBER
Close