Center for Business and Economic Research - Ball State University


CBER Data Center
Projects and PublicationsEconomic IndicatorsWeekly CommentaryCommunity Asset InventoryManufacturing Scorecard

About

Commentaries are published weekly and distributed through the Indianapolis Business Journal and many other print and online publications. Disclaimer

RSS Feed

Disclaimer

The views expressed in these commentaries do not reflect those of Ball State University or the Center for Business and Economic Research.

Recent

Two Key Economic Lessons in One BillHoosiers face trade-offs and opportunity costs in the wake of SEA1.

Time to Fix Economic Development PolicyAllocating tax dollars to land development won’t cause economic growth.

The Unanticipated Effects of SB1Businesses, governments and households may all feel the effects.

The Stupidest of PoliciesThis whipsawing of tariff rates has unnerved financial markets, which on Wednesday, were toying with a liquidity crisis.

View archives

Top Tags

jobs and employment 261
economics 201
state and local government 188
education 186
indiana 171
economic development 171
budget and spending 145
taxes 144
law and public policy 142
workforce and human capital 139
Browse all tags
Reporter / Admin Login

September 6, 2010

Labor Unions, Trade Unions and Labor Day

Labor Day must rank second only to St. Valentine’s Day in terms of our ignorance about the holiday’s reason for existing.  Other than a column or two on the fading labor movement, or a union hall fish fry, the grand history of American unions is largely forgotten.  So this weekend, just about as many of us will think about labor unions as those who dwell upon St. Valentine’s martyrdom in a Roman coliseum next February.  For unions this is a largely self-inflicted wound.

Before the Second World War, American unions may have been unloved by business owners, but were hardly the target of widespread calumny and disdain.  Indeed, the labor movement is largely responsible for securing cherished workplace reforms we now view as commonplace.  But the movement itself contained an intellectual force that disdained national identity, arguing for an international brotherhood of workers.  To many, this smelled an awful lot like communism.  Perhaps the most absurd case of this occurred when the United Mine Workers struck in 1943 – during the darkest days of World War II, as daily American battle deaths exceeded those we’ve thus far lost in Afghanistan.  Hatred of unions swept the military – miners were exempt from the draft, paid much better than an army sergeant and demanding a salary increase equivalent to half the annual pay of a draftee.  FDR weighed in clearly during a May 1943 fireside chat, noting that “every idle miner directly and individually is obstructing the war effort.” 

Though the union movement in general avoided strikes during the war and many were strongly anti-communist in the ’50s and ’60s, the widespread support for unions was never again as broad, even as membership climbed.  By the 1970s strikes that appeared to cripple an already fragile economy and wage demands that seemed to help fuel inflation clobbered the union movements’ popular appeal.  It didn’t matter that the strikes and wage demands did little to damage the economy and nothing to spawn inflation – the damage was done.  By the 1980s union membership began to plummet, far faster than manufacturing job losses would suggest.  At the end of this recession private sector unions face extinction. But it need not be so.

For labor unions to survive, they must follow the path of their more successful brethren in trade unions.  As I noted in an earlier column (which resulted in many angry letters), trade unions, masons, carpenters and the like have a centuries old tradition and serve as marketplaces for skilled workers.  Trade unions remain strong because they work with, not against, the businesses that employ them.  This symbiotic relationship isn’t transient, but is foundational to the way they do business.  Certainly the relationship between trade unions and businesses isn’t all love and sunshine, but it works.  While many in the large labor unions are working on reforming, they also need a lot of reputation management.  For you see that while ancient stone masons spawned a worldwide fraternal group, the UMW’s preferred presidential candidate hasn’t won West Virginia in three elections.

Link to this commentary: https://commentaries.cberdata.org/528/labor-unions-trade-unions-and-labor-day

Tags: business, right-to-work and labor unions, right-to-work and labor unions


About the Author

Michael Hicks cberdirector@bsu.edu

Michael J. Hicks, PhD, is the director of the Center for Business and Economic Research and the George and Frances Ball distinguished professor of economics in the Miller College of Business at Ball State University. Note: The views expressed here are solely those of the author, and do not represent those of funders, associations, any entity of Ball State University, or its governing body.

© Center for Business and Economic Research, Ball State University

About Ball State CBER Data Center

Ball State CBER Data Center is one-stop shop for economic data including demographics, education, health, and social capital. Our easy-to-use, visual web tools offer data collection and analysis for grant writers, economic developers, policy makers, and the general public.

Ball State CBER Data Center (cberdata.org) is a product of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. CBER's mission is to conduct relevant and timely public policy research on a wide range of economic issues affecting the state and nation. Learn more.

Terms of Service

Center for Business and Economic Research

Ball State University • Whitinger Business Building, room 149
2000 W. University Ave.
Muncie, IN 47306-0360
Phone:
765-285-5926
Email:
cber@bsu.edu
Website:
www.bsu.edu/cber
Facebook:
www.facebook.com/BallStateCBER
Twitter:
www.twitter.com/BallStateCBER
Close