Center for Business and Economic Research - Ball State University


CBER Data Center
Projects and PublicationsEconomic IndicatorsWeekly CommentaryCommunity Asset InventoryManufacturing Scorecard

About

Commentaries are published weekly and distributed through the Indianapolis Business Journal and many other print and online publications. Disclaimer

RSS Feed

Disclaimer

The views expressed in these commentaries do not reflect those of Ball State University or the Center for Business and Economic Research.

Recent

Two Key Economic Lessons in One BillHoosiers face trade-offs and opportunity costs in the wake of SEA1.

Time to Fix Economic Development PolicyAllocating tax dollars to land development won’t cause economic growth.

The Unanticipated Effects of SB1Businesses, governments and households may all feel the effects.

The Stupidest of PoliciesThis whipsawing of tariff rates has unnerved financial markets, which on Wednesday, were toying with a liquidity crisis.

View archives

Top Tags

jobs and employment 261
economics 201
state and local government 188
education 186
indiana 171
economic development 171
budget and spending 145
taxes 144
law and public policy 142
workforce and human capital 139
Browse all tags
Reporter / Admin Login

May 19, 2008

Gas Prices Fueling Election Nonsense

It is election year, and gas prices are high.  Though this is not a mixture that is conducive to candor, the level of policy schizophrenia is amazing.  It isn’t that any one policy is necessarily bad, it is simply that the nonsense spouted by the big three candidates has reached a new level. 

Senator McCain’s call for a summer gasoline tax amnesty would certainly provide a bit of cost savings for American families who use this time to travel.  The problem is that Senator McCain also argues that the U.S. should be more self-sufficient in its energy use.   But lower gasoline prices (and the associated higher usage) will not increase our energy self-sufficiency. 

Senator Clinton made the same policy recommendation.  And, like Senator McCain, calls for the U.S. to take steps to be less dependent upon foreign oil.  This and efforts to address global warming are, according to her official campaign website, “top priorities.”  That may be so, but it would seem that gathering votes and appeasing disgruntled motorists have edged out energy independence and global warming as top national priorities. 

Senator Obama has wisely argued that the gas tax holiday is a gimmick.  But, like a medieval physician, he made the right diagnosis but prescribed bleeding as a cure.  His proposed windfall profits tax on oil companies might make consumers feel better (though you would have to be pretty vindictive, if not downright stupid, not to choose the tax cut alternative).  One thing Senator Obama’s proposal will not do is cut gasoline prices.  Indeed, it will serve to increase prices at the pump by reducing supply.  This is hardly the road to energy independence. 

We have three candidates for the most important elected office in the history of the world.  In the measure of their policy recommendations it would seem that the simplest economics of energy policy seems as difficult for each to comprehend as theoretical physics.  Here are some simple, but not easy policy choices. 

First, if you want to reduce U.S. dependence on foreign oil and reduce greenhouse emissions, simply raise the national gas tax.  The higher and faster you raise it, the quicker we can achieve both goals.  There is a lot of pretend sophistication about raising the fuel efficiency standards on cars and trucks.  That just serves to hide the tax in a less efficient regulatory scheme within the higher production costs of these new models. 

Second, if you simply want to make the U.S. less dependent on foreign oil, you can also increase domestic sources of energy.  A huge subsidization of nuclear power facilities and drilling for Alaskan oil would both serve to cut our dependence on foreign oil (and using the facilities would actually reduce greenhouse gas emissions). 

Third, if you want to punish oil companies, do it the old fashioned way.  Start your own oil company, gather investors, buy up the oil and undercut their prices at the pump.  The only problem you’ll have is that the investors are going to want to enjoy those profits.  That is economics, like it or not.

Link to this commentary: https://commentaries.cberdata.org/113/gas-prices-fueling-election-nonsense

Tags: prices and inflation, election


About the Author

Michael Hicks cberdirector@bsu.edu

Michael J. Hicks, PhD, is the director of the Center for Business and Economic Research and the George and Frances Ball distinguished professor of economics in the Miller College of Business at Ball State University. Note: The views expressed here are solely those of the author, and do not represent those of funders, associations, any entity of Ball State University, or its governing body.

© Center for Business and Economic Research, Ball State University

About Ball State CBER Data Center

Ball State CBER Data Center is one-stop shop for economic data including demographics, education, health, and social capital. Our easy-to-use, visual web tools offer data collection and analysis for grant writers, economic developers, policy makers, and the general public.

Ball State CBER Data Center (cberdata.org) is a product of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. CBER's mission is to conduct relevant and timely public policy research on a wide range of economic issues affecting the state and nation. Learn more.

Terms of Service

Center for Business and Economic Research

Ball State University • Whitinger Business Building, room 149
2000 W. University Ave.
Muncie, IN 47306-0360
Phone:
765-285-5926
Email:
cber@bsu.edu
Website:
www.bsu.edu/cber
Facebook:
www.facebook.com/BallStateCBER
Twitter:
www.twitter.com/BallStateCBER
Close