Center for Business and Economic Research - Ball State University


CBER Data Center
Projects and PublicationsEconomic IndicatorsWeekly CommentaryCommunity Asset InventoryManufacturing Scorecard

About

Commentaries are published weekly and distributed through the Indianapolis Business Journal and many other print and online publications. Disclaimer

RSS Feed

Disclaimer

The views expressed in these commentaries do not reflect those of Ball State University or the Center for Business and Economic Research.

Recent

Two Key Economic Lessons in One BillHoosiers face trade-offs and opportunity costs in the wake of SEA1.

Time to Fix Economic Development PolicyAllocating tax dollars to land development won’t cause economic growth.

The Unanticipated Effects of SB1Businesses, governments and households may all feel the effects.

The Stupidest of PoliciesThis whipsawing of tariff rates has unnerved financial markets, which on Wednesday, were toying with a liquidity crisis.

View archives

Top Tags

jobs and employment 261
economics 201
state and local government 188
education 186
economic development 171
indiana 171
budget and spending 145
taxes 144
law and public policy 142
workforce and human capital 139
Browse all tags
Reporter / Admin Login

August 25, 2008

A Future Fuelled by Alternative Energy Remains a Distant Possibility

Before writing about energy matters I am going to have to make a confession. I am a closet environmentalist. I support a wide range of environmental policies and think it often makes good business sense to go green. But sadly, far too many supporters of environmental policy look at the world through green colored glasses. One result is that it is increasingly difficult to take many environmentalists seriously. 

One verdant silliness is the assertion that we can replace our energy demand with alternative fuels in just a decade. Today the US derives just 7% of our energy from alternative fuels. It is useful to break that down by type to see just how little alternative energy we currently use. Of our total alternative fuel usage, 36% is hydroelectric. We cannot tap further into that source without damaging ecosystems. The same is true of our 5% use of wind energy. The damage to ecosystems through fish and wildlife kills is one of the great paradoxes of alternative energy that environmentalists only speak of when it comes time to finally build the dams and wind turbines in their communities. 

Over half of our alternative energy is from biofuels. Such sources as switchgrass and corn based ethanol offer the hope of renewable energy and independence from non-domestic fuels. But the environmental impact of these sources is worse than petroleum. 

Geothermal energy and solar power (through photovoltaic cells) account for a whopping 6 percent of our alternative fuel portfolio, or roughly 42 ten-thousandths of our annual energy needs. To place this in context a little math is helpful. A full home geothermal unit could cost about $15,000. This is a pretty low estimate today, but not outside the realm of possibility in the next couple of decades. This solar array could almost entirely power a very energy efficient home in a very sunny place. But, it won’t provide even half the necessary power for most of the nation’s housing stock, and it won’t do anything for business and government use of energy. It will cost $2.5 trillion just to get about half our home based energy use through alternative energy. That’s more than the total outlays for construction of the interstate highway system (in nominal dollars) from 1958 through 1991. Even this won’t get us near halfway even if we add huge energy efficiency gains, and squeeze another percent or two out of geothermal. 

The notion that we can achieve an alternative energy future in ten years is a myth of Homeric proportions. No serious analyst believes otherwise. But that’s only half the trouble with the argument. 

On the day you read this article perhaps 40,000 children will die of malaria for want of pennies a day in prophylaxis. The environmental movement in America tells us that it is a moral imperative to begin with what would amount to the largest single public sector investment in history focused on alternative energy. A fact laden debate on priorities among serious people is sorely needed.

Link to this commentary: https://commentaries.cberdata.org/99/a-future-fuelled-by-alternative-energy-remains-a-distant-possibility

Tags: environment


About the Author

Michael Hicks cberdirector@bsu.edu

Michael J. Hicks, PhD, is the director of the Center for Business and Economic Research and the George and Frances Ball distinguished professor of economics in the Miller College of Business at Ball State University. Note: The views expressed here are solely those of the author, and do not represent those of funders, associations, any entity of Ball State University, or its governing body.

© Center for Business and Economic Research, Ball State University

About Ball State CBER Data Center

Ball State CBER Data Center is one-stop shop for economic data including demographics, education, health, and social capital. Our easy-to-use, visual web tools offer data collection and analysis for grant writers, economic developers, policy makers, and the general public.

Ball State CBER Data Center (cberdata.org) is a product of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. CBER's mission is to conduct relevant and timely public policy research on a wide range of economic issues affecting the state and nation. Learn more.

Terms of Service

Center for Business and Economic Research

Ball State University • Whitinger Business Building, room 149
2000 W. University Ave.
Muncie, IN 47306-0360
Phone:
765-285-5926
Email:
cber@bsu.edu
Website:
www.bsu.edu/cber
Facebook:
www.facebook.com/BallStateCBER
Twitter:
www.twitter.com/BallStateCBER
Close