Center for Business and Economic Research - Ball State University


CBER Data Center
Projects and PublicationsEconomic IndicatorsWeekly CommentaryCommunity Asset InventoryManufacturing Scorecard

About

Commentaries are published weekly and distributed through the Indianapolis Business Journal and many other print and online publications. Disclaimer

RSS Feed

Disclaimer

The views expressed in these commentaries do not reflect those of Ball State University or the Center for Business and Economic Research.

Recent

Trump’s Tariff Recession Is HereMy new forecast, completed in late April, predicts a national recession began as early as March in reaction to Trump’s tarriffs.

Two Key Economic Lessons in One BillHoosiers face trade-offs and opportunity costs in the wake of SEA1.

Time to Fix Economic Development PolicyAllocating tax dollars to land development won’t cause economic growth.

The Unanticipated Effects of SB1Businesses, governments and households may all feel the effects.

View archives

Top Tags

jobs and employment 261
economics 201
state and local government 188
education 186
economic development 171
indiana 171
budget and spending 145
taxes 144
law and public policy 142
workforce and human capital 139
Browse all tags
Reporter / Admin Login

September 15, 2008

Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae Takeover Offers Chance to Get Privatization Right

It is hard to know what to think about the US Treasury takeover of mortgage lending giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Other than the imminent demise of such charming company nicknames, what will this mean to workers, investors, creditors, mortgage holders and taxpayers? 

If you are trying to obtain a new mortgage, the bail-out (if that’s the right word) should result in modestly lower borrowing costs. 

If you are an investor (and that mostly means larger banks and a few remaining retirement accounts held in mutual funds), well – you have lost big time. Notice the use of past tense. The value of these investor stocks were already in the “Chuck e Cheese” ticket value range. Now they will not rebound. 

If you have lent either company money (and that is primarily the People’s Bank of China, their version of our Federal Reserve Bank) you should recoup most of your loan. As tempting as it might be for some to skewer the Chinese, the US Treasury and Congress carefully and wisely applied existing bankruptcy law to the takeover legislation, largely insulating these lenders. So who loses? 

Workers at both firms are mostly still employed. I doubt that will last long. Sometime, probably early in 2009 it is likely that both companies will be split and sold to other financial services firms. Some workers will be taken along, others will be redundant and any prediction on who and when these jobs will change is premature. If you are top management of either firm, you obviously enjoy a golden parachute . . . but you better hope the books are perfect. Squadrons of forensic accountants are beginning their work at putting you in jail and many in Congress will be all too happy to air their findings. 

Taxpayers may or may not lose. Congress has authorized perhaps $200 billion in support.  This may be nothing more than a short term loan which will be recouped when the companies are later sold, or it may be a complete loss. I suspect the actual outcome lies somewhere between the two extremes, but it is far too early to tell. Some taxpayers will benefit as mortgage loan costs drop (or at least do not rise). Also, the very positive reaction from financial markets worldwide at least adds some value to suffering retirement accounts and stock portfolios. In the end, the negatives will make little difference to the Federal budget. 

The sad truth is that it has long been known that the US taxpayer would protect these companies from failure. After all, they were created by the US government, not investors. There is much speculation that this step marks the end of a lengthy worldwide march toward free markets. I strongly doubt this marks a turning point. I imagine we will get it right this time.

Link to this commentary: https://commentaries.cberdata.org/96/freddie-mac-and-fannie-mae-takeover-offers-chance-to-get-privatization-right

Tags: finance


About the Author

Michael Hicks cberdirector@bsu.edu

Michael J. Hicks, PhD, is the director of the Center for Business and Economic Research and the George and Frances Ball distinguished professor of economics in the Miller College of Business at Ball State University. Note: The views expressed here are solely those of the author, and do not represent those of funders, associations, any entity of Ball State University, or its governing body.

© Center for Business and Economic Research, Ball State University

About Ball State CBER Data Center

Ball State CBER Data Center is one-stop shop for economic data including demographics, education, health, and social capital. Our easy-to-use, visual web tools offer data collection and analysis for grant writers, economic developers, policy makers, and the general public.

Ball State CBER Data Center (cberdata.org) is a product of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. CBER's mission is to conduct relevant and timely public policy research on a wide range of economic issues affecting the state and nation. Learn more.

Terms of Service

Center for Business and Economic Research

Ball State University • Whitinger Business Building, room 149
2000 W. University Ave.
Muncie, IN 47306-0360
Phone:
765-285-5926
Email:
cber@bsu.edu
Website:
www.bsu.edu/cber
Facebook:
www.facebook.com/BallStateCBER
Twitter:
www.twitter.com/BallStateCBER
Close