Center for Business and Economic Research - Ball State University


CBER Data Center
Projects and PublicationsEconomic IndicatorsWeekly CommentaryCommunity Asset InventoryManufacturing Scorecard

About

Commentaries are published weekly and distributed through the Indianapolis Business Journal and many other print and online publications. Disclaimer

RSS Feed

Disclaimer

The views expressed in these commentaries do not reflect those of Ball State University or the Center for Business and Economic Research.

Recent

It’s TDS to Suppose These Tariffs Are WorkingTrump has pushed the U.S. into an economic downturn that will be especially hurtful to Hoosiers.

Trump’s Tariff Recession Is HereMy new forecast, completed in late April, predicts a national recession began as early as March in reaction to Trump’s tarriffs.

Two Key Economic Lessons in One BillHoosiers face trade-offs and opportunity costs in the wake of SEA1.

Time to Fix Economic Development PolicyAllocating tax dollars to land development won’t cause economic growth.

View archives

Top Tags

jobs and employment 262
economics 203
state and local government 188
education 186
indiana 173
economic development 171
taxes 146
budget and spending 145
law and public policy 144
workforce and human capital 139
Browse all tags
Reporter / Admin Login

February 26, 2018

School Choice Saves Communities

The past two decades have been an interesting period for K-12 education in Indiana. Significant policy changes have allowed families more freedom in their educational choices. This has led to plenty of political posturing and misinformation. So, it is worth reviewing actual data about school choice dynamics.

First, student enrollment in Indiana, both public and private, has been remarkably stable since the late 1990s. Enrollment in 1998 was 1.113 million students. It peaked in 2005 at 1.156 million students and has since declined to 1.108 million kids. That shouldn’t shock anyone, but these next data will. In 1998, 11.34 percent of Hoosier students were in private schools; there were no charters at the time. In 2016, a total of 9.62 percent of students were in private and charter schools. So, despite what you may hear, enrollment in non-traditional schools (charter and private) has actually declined since the late 1990s. So, yes, folks, the hysteria about student losses to charter schools and private schools is carefully fabricated, deliberate misinformation.

In fact, Hoosier parents increasingly choose local public schools over other alternatives, and that has been the most illuminating element of school choice in Indiana. Last year, only 5.6 percent of students were in private schools (half of the 1998 share), while 4.8 percent attended a local public school outside their corporation. Only 4.2 percent were in charter schools. The big story is the rise of public school choice.

Attending school outside a local area is a costly and inconvenient family decision. However, that decision is highly correlated with simple measures of school performance. With at least one school corporation still protesting its 2016-2017 grade, I use 2015-2016 numbers. In that year, for every 100 kids that transferred out of a local public school, A-corporations saw 133 in-transfers, B-corporations received 88 in-transfers, C-corporations had only 54 kids in-transfers, and D-corporations saw a meager 6 in-transfers for every 100 who left. In the state’s one F school, 6,776 were out-transfers and there were no in-transfers.

Many educators will say, correctly, that school performance based on standardized tests is highly correlated with student poverty. However, the variability between schools even on pass rates for poor children is stunning and illuminating.

In Muncie, where more than 40 percent of students have departed to other school corporations, the ISTEP+ pass rate for poor children (who qualify for free or reduced lunch) is 40.3 percent. In the other local public schools, poor children pass the ISTEP+ at 49.3 percent, and at much lower cost. In Muncie it costs the state $18,947 per poor child passing the ISTEP+, but in the average of the surrounding counties the cost is $13,050. This dynamic plays out elsewhere. In Gary, it costs $37,877 to get a single child to pass the ISTEP, but in Cannelton it cost the state only $22,175. Both are F schools (or will be after the appeal process concludes) and have nearly identical share of kids eligible for Free and Reduced Lunch respectively, 82 and 79 percent respectively. Neither of these are good school systems, but it demonstrates that where you choose to be a poor student matters to your success, which is the essence of school choice.

There’s no use pretending school choice is perfect, but the notion that school choice has damaged local public schools is mistaken. All school choice did was let students flee underperforming schools without forcing families to move. That is exactly what places like Gary, Muncie or Terre Haute need, for without better schools or better school choice there will be no future economic or population growth.

As I write this, I suspect that many readers are shocked by these data. For too long we’ve heard a false set of endlessly repeated talking points that tell us school choice is devastating local communities and closing schools. The truth is otherwise, and in fact, school choice has been a saving grace for tens of thousands of Hoosier families. Moreover, it has offered a second lease on life to communities like Gary who have failed their children and otherwise face endless decline.

Link to this commentary: https://commentaries.cberdata.org/938/school-choice-saves-communities

Tags: schools k-12, migration and population change, quality of life and placemaking


About the Author

Michael Hicks cberdirector@bsu.edu

Michael J. Hicks, PhD, is the director of the Center for Business and Economic Research and the George and Frances Ball distinguished professor of economics in the Miller College of Business at Ball State University. Note: The views expressed here are solely those of the author, and do not represent those of funders, associations, any entity of Ball State University, or its governing body.

© Center for Business and Economic Research, Ball State University

About Ball State CBER Data Center

Ball State CBER Data Center is one-stop shop for economic data including demographics, education, health, and social capital. Our easy-to-use, visual web tools offer data collection and analysis for grant writers, economic developers, policy makers, and the general public.

Ball State CBER Data Center (cberdata.org) is a product of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. CBER's mission is to conduct relevant and timely public policy research on a wide range of economic issues affecting the state and nation. Learn more.

Terms of Service

Center for Business and Economic Research

Ball State University • Whitinger Business Building, room 149
2000 W. University Ave.
Muncie, IN 47306-0360
Phone:
765-285-5926
Email:
cber@bsu.edu
Website:
www.bsu.edu/cber
Facebook:
www.facebook.com/BallStateCBER
Twitter:
www.twitter.com/BallStateCBER
Close