Leaders of Indiana’s legislature have signaled they will take a look at school at school funding issues this year. Among their concerns are 1) the use of an early warning signal of financial distress, 2) the creation of technical assistance teams for school corporations and 3) a tiered approach to a state takeover of distressed systems. Sadly, among voters and even among elected officials there remains an astonishing level of misunderstanding about school funding in Indiana, and what has caused some recent problems for many school corporations. A little explanation is in order.
In 2008, Indiana changed the funding approach for schools to a process that phased in over three years. Under the new formula, the state took over 100 percent of operational funding. Local property taxes could only be used for transportation and school construction. Under the formula, schools were paid a base amount for each child they enrolled, and an extra stipend for the number of poor children enrolled in the school corporation. This was done to insure school children in poor areas received more funding than students in rich areas. This bears repeating.
The state pays all the operating expenses—teacher salaries, technology, health care, and the like. Poor places get much more funding than richer places and federal grants and aid tip the scale even further towards poor schools. As a result, schools with the highest share of poor students have about 40 percent more money per student than do schools with the lowest share of poor students. This is not a mistake; it was the intent of the funding formula to give more funds to poorer places.
One consequence of this is that the two school corporations the state has taken over, Gary and Muncie, are actually awash in annual revenues when compared to other school corporations in Indiana. For example, Muncie Community Schools receives almost $25,000 more from the state for a class of 25 students than any school corporation in Delaware County. And, last year, the affluent Carmel Clay School Corporation received $5,744 per student, while Gary received $8,030.
These funding differences do not imply that the funding formula is ideal. Perhaps the funding differences between schools is too large, maybe it is too small. Perhaps Indiana needs to spend another $500 million on K-12 education. These are worthy questions requiring lengthy study and work in a budget session of the General Assembly. However, these funding data do make it clear that financial problems at Gary and Muncie have absolutely nothing to do with revenues. It is all about the spending, or rather misspending. So, when someone claims that a school corporation is in financial trouble because the community is poor, it is clear they simply have no idea what they are talking about.
With the state takeover of Gary and Muncie schools, one key lesson became apparent. The financial distress for both corporations resulted from decades of poor management by both school boards. The underlying problems in both places were well reported by local media and successive superintendents. The financial warning signs were apparent well more than a decade before either school was taken over by the state. Thus, over the past few months, the Legislative Services Agency has created a financial condition indicator dashboard. This would alert the legislature, and the public to school corporations who are headed down the road to financial distress. Using this tool, proposed legislation (Senate Bill 368) seeks to create technical assistance teams that would help schools before they become truly distressed.
It is unfortunate that this legislation is necessary. Indiana school boards have all the information they need to assess and correct these problems. What they lack isn’t financial information, but the courage to make difficult and unpopular decisions. The best way to fix this problem is at the ballot box. However, the financial condition indicator dashboard and the technical assistance teams proposed in SB 368 will help prevent the wholly preventable financial mess of Muncie and Gary schools from happening in other communities.
About the Author
Recent
The Degrowth Movement Is Wrong and ImmoralDegrowthers are terribly mistaken in three big ways.
Economic and Policy Expectations for a Trump PresidencyIt is not hard to gauge the policy choices Trump will prefer.
My Apology to LogansportThe city is well known as an immigration success story in the Midwest.
Indiana Is Ground Zero for Anti-American IdeologiesBad ideas rarely die of their own accord.
View archives