Center for Business and Economic Research - Ball State University


CBER Data Center
Projects and
Publications
Economic
Indicators
Weekly
Commentary
County
Profiles
Community
Asset Inventory
Brownfield Grant
Writers' Toolbox
Manufacturing
Scorecard

About

Commentaries are published weekly and distributed through the Indianapolis Business Journal and many other print and online publications. Disclaimer

RSS Feed

Disclaimer

The views expressed in these commentaries do not reflect those of Ball State University or the Center for Business and Economic Research.

Recent

Economic Development Should Be About Value, Not CostIn the late 1970s–80s, you were taught that low tax rates and capital investment were the key to growth and prosperity, but that theory has not panned out as anticipated.

Inflation Is Not Our Top ProblemRecession effects are influenced by the tradeoff between unemployment and inflation.

What Will This Economic Recovery Yield for Indiana?The quest to better fund schools and improve our workforce cannot become a partisan issue.

Let’s Be Honest About the COVID Relief BillToo little stimulus is far worse than too much.

View archives

Top Tags

jobs and employment 199
economics 162
economic development 121
education 118
taxes 117
finance 102
recession 93
budget and spending 75
state and local government 74
unemployment and the labor market 72
Browse all tags
Reporter / Admin Login

February 19, 2017

Technology Related Job Losses of the Last Century

One way to analyze the impact of technological change in our economy is to look at history. In so doing, we might learn something useful about the challenges we face today. To illustrate this, let me offer some facts about one of Indiana’s great industries, and the change that has swept through it over the past century or so.

Technology has played an outsized role in job losses in one Hoosier industry (I’ll reveal which industry later). Indeed, thanks to machines including the internal combustion engine, to the skill of chemists and to the innovations of GPS satellites, Indiana alone has 1.5 million fewer jobs than we would otherwise have in this industry. This technological gain has been devastating to many related industries and job losses have been clustered among some of our most defenseless demographic groups. Whole communities have disappeared and places in Indiana have returned to virtual wilderness because of the job losses due to productivity gains in this industry. One might suppose this a dark state of affairs.

However, there is good news. As it turns out, last year was likely was a record for this industry, with the inflation-adjusted value of production higher than ever before. The industry I am referring to is agriculture.

Still, that’s a lot of lost jobs that fell heavily on the 14-18 year age group. Back in 1916 most Indiana teens didn’t need to go to high school, instead they could count on a farm job right after eighth grade. A century ago, farming was a solid middle-class job, and 1.5 million of these jobs evaporated in just a century. Now barely 12,000 Hoosiers toil on farms. So, are we better off? Well, yes.

Since the turn of the 20th century, when maybe half of Hoosiers worked in agriculture, we are better off in ways that were unimaginable at the time. The future is likely to hold the same head spinning change. In 1900 lifespans in the Midwest hovered around 50 years. Today they push 80, and are likely under-estimated since they are calibrated on current technology. That means the average age of someone who died in 1900 was less than 50, while it is likely that half of American kids born in 2000 will live to see 2100.

All that technology accompanied other changes as well. Things like water purification and sanitary sewers saved lives, so did antibiotics and the other medical advances of the century. None of these things would have occurred without a huge shift of resources from raising food to other activities. In 1900 the typical household spent 44 percent of their income on food, within a century it was 14 percent. Obesity, not hunger is the mark of poverty today.

In just one century, one-third of earnings were shifted from food to other items of consumption.  Moreover, these incomes grew by more than six-fold when adjusted for inflation. We now buy things that were available only to the very rich in 1900. Things like household plumbing, restorative dentistry, obstetrical services, and a college education were the trappings of only the very affluent in 1900. Things like wireless internet, talking movies, air transportation or non-surgical cancer treatments were unavailable at any price.

Today, an American family of three at the poverty line enjoys a standard of living nearly five-times what the average American family had a century ago and lives 50 percent longer. This is the very definition of progress, and by the way, we more than made up for those lost 1.5 million jobs in the past half century alone.

Progress through technology and automation does more than allow us to consume more goods and services, which is a laudable goal in itself. The real benefit of economic growth is that it frees up the creative and innovative minds of people who might otherwise spend much of their lives plowing behind a mule. The transition isn’t painless, but so far has always been worth the costs.  We should expect that of the next 100 years.

Link to this commentary: https://commentaries.cberdata.org/878/technology-related-job-losses-of-the-last-century

Tags: technology and automation, indiana, productivity and efficiency, unemployment and the labor market


About the Author

Michael Hicks cberdirector@bsu.edu

Michael J. Hicks, PhD, is the director of the Center for Business and Economic Research and the George and Frances Ball distinguished professor of economics in the Miller College of Business at Ball State University. Hicks earned doctoral and master’s degrees in economics from the University of Tennessee and a bachelor’s degree in economics from Virginia Military Institute. He has authored two books and more than 60 scholarly works focusing on state and local public policy, including tax and expenditure policy and the impact of Wal-Mart on local economies.

© Center for Business and Economic Research, Ball State University

About Ball State CBER Data Center

Ball State CBER Data Center is one-stop shop for economic data including demographics, education, health, and social capital. Our easy-to-use, visual web tools offer data collection and analysis for grant writers, economic developers, policy makers, and the general public.

Ball State CBER Data Center (cberdata.org) is a product of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. CBER's mission is to conduct relevant and timely public policy research on a wide range of economic issues affecting the state and nation. Learn more.

Terms of Service

Center for Business and Economic Research

Ball State University • Whitinger Business Building, room 149
2000 W. University Ave.
Muncie, IN 47306-0360
Phone:
765-285-5926
Email:
cber@bsu.edu
Website:
www.bsu.edu/cber
Facebook:
www.facebook.com/BallStateCBER
Twitter:
www.twitter.com/BallStateCBER
Close