Center for Business and Economic Research - Ball State University


CBER Data Center
Projects and
Publications
Economic
Indicators
Weekly
Commentary
County
Profiles
Community
Asset Inventory
Brownfield Grant
Writers' Toolbox
Manufacturing
Scorecard

About

Commentaries are published weekly and distributed through the Indianapolis Business Journal and many other print and online publications. Disclaimer

RSS Feed

Disclaimer

The views expressed in these commentaries do not reflect those of Ball State University or the Center for Business and Economic Research.

Recent

Inflation Is Not Our Top ProblemRecession effects are influenced by the tradeoff between unemployment and inflation.

What Will This Economic Recovery Yield for Indiana?The quest to better fund schools and improve our workforce cannot become a partisan issue.

Let’s Be Honest About the COVID Relief BillToo little stimulus is far worse than too much.

Two Sides of the Minimum WageWhat role should the government play?

View archives

Top Tags

jobs and employment 199
economics 162
economic development 121
education 118
taxes 117
finance 102
recession 93
budget and spending 75
state and local government 74
unemployment and the labor market 72
Browse all tags
Reporter / Admin Login

November 27, 2016

The Origins of American Free Trade

The early American colonies were viewed by the English Crown as convenient for two purposes—advantageous trade and the disposal of uncompliant riff-raff. The trade model followed by Great Britain later became known as mercantilism. These mercantilists believed that economic growth was caused by preferential exchange. The colonies delivered raw materials, English merchants refined them, provided the means of transport and banking. The idea was that while the colonies remained poor, the English would prosper from this arrangement.

To provide labor and secure these colonies, the Crown delivered upon these shores those men and women who were inconvenient to law and order. First came those whose religious feelings were deemed a threat, then came petty criminals, and in the final tranche of colonial humanity came the soldiery to make war on the French and Indians.

Along the way something unexpected happened. The colonies grew rich and these unschooled, unwashed, itinerant masses became capable of self-rule. In the salutary document of sovereignty, our Constitution, these former colonial riff-raff took steady aim at Mercantilism. They knew full well that the barriers to trade between colonies were designed to suppress commerce and liberty. So, our Constitution, through the Interstate Commerce Clause (Article I, Section 8), forbade individual states from restricting trade.

The United States of America thus became the first free trade zone. One meaningful result of this is that our economy stands in stark contrast to those who have long restricted trade. Take for example India and China. The poverty line in the United States is $11,770 for one person, while the per capita GDP in India is $1,498 and $6,807 in China. Even the poorest Americans are upper middle class Chinese and ultra-rich Indians. Trade wasn’t the only factor, but unrestricted interstate commerce made us far more productive and prosperous. The absence of trade has held back China and India, and we should be glad for them that they’ve embraced trade so fully in the last generation.

Today there is a push to severely restrict trade. Many Americans believe that international commerce has resulted in net job losses in the US. These people are wrong in the sort of flat-earth, germs don’t cause disease sort of way. They are immune to the simple facts such as US manufacturing employment actually rose in the six years following NAFTA or that 2015 was the record US manufacturing production year (and yes, that is in inflation-adjusted dollars). But, it is helpful to admit there is something to be gleaned from their complaint.

Free trade makes us better off in many small ways, whether it is with Illinois or India. On average we are all better off, but some of us are more better off than others. And that is what fuels the misanthropy about trade. If you sell a service overseas, like software or movies, or if you manufacture a highly technical product like orthopedic joints or advanced avionics, trade is a panacea. Trade is also great if you produce agricultural products cheaply, like all those row crops in the Midwest. Trade is good for the part of all of us that are consumers, because it gives us more variety at a lower price.

If you live where there are low productivity factories, trade hurts. It doesn’t hurt as much as automation and robotics, but it still imposes the pains of decline, population loss and the visible scars of the rust belt. Moreover, workers in low productivity plants typically have fewer re-employment options, and are clustered in large numbers. The bad of trade is easy to see, the good is less visible. This fact animated a good part of this election, and remains a central issue for the next president and Congress. In addressing it, they must not lose sight of the role trade played in our prosperity. 

Link to this commentary: https://commentaries.cberdata.org/866/the-origins-of-american-free-trade

Tags: trade, foreign policy, law and public policy


About the Author

Michael Hicks cberdirector@bsu.edu

Michael J. Hicks, PhD, is the director of the Center for Business and Economic Research and the George and Frances Ball distinguished professor of economics in the Miller College of Business at Ball State University. Hicks earned doctoral and master’s degrees in economics from the University of Tennessee and a bachelor’s degree in economics from Virginia Military Institute. He has authored two books and more than 60 scholarly works focusing on state and local public policy, including tax and expenditure policy and the impact of Wal-Mart on local economies.

© Center for Business and Economic Research, Ball State University

About Ball State CBER Data Center

Ball State CBER Data Center is one-stop shop for economic data including demographics, education, health, and social capital. Our easy-to-use, visual web tools offer data collection and analysis for grant writers, economic developers, policy makers, and the general public.

Ball State CBER Data Center (cberdata.org) is a product of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. CBER's mission is to conduct relevant and timely public policy research on a wide range of economic issues affecting the state and nation. Learn more.

Terms of Service

Center for Business and Economic Research

Ball State University • Whitinger Business Building, room 149
2000 W. University Ave.
Muncie, IN 47306-0360
Phone:
765-285-5926
Email:
cber@bsu.edu
Website:
www.bsu.edu/cber
Facebook:
www.facebook.com/BallStateCBER
Twitter:
www.twitter.com/BallStateCBER
Close