Center for Business and Economic Research - Ball State University


CBER Data Center
Projects and PublicationsEconomic IndicatorsWeekly CommentaryCommunity Asset InventoryManufacturing Scorecard

About

Commentaries are published weekly and distributed through the Indianapolis Business Journal and many other print and online publications. Disclaimer

RSS Feed

Disclaimer

The views expressed in these commentaries do not reflect those of Ball State University or the Center for Business and Economic Research.

Recent

Two Key Economic Lessons in One BillHoosiers face trade-offs and opportunity costs in the wake of SEA1.

Time to Fix Economic Development PolicyAllocating tax dollars to land development won’t cause economic growth.

The Unanticipated Effects of SB1Businesses, governments and households may all feel the effects.

The Stupidest of PoliciesThis whipsawing of tariff rates has unnerved financial markets, which on Wednesday, were toying with a liquidity crisis.

View archives

Top Tags

jobs and employment 261
economics 201
state and local government 188
education 186
indiana 171
economic development 171
budget and spending 145
taxes 144
law and public policy 142
workforce and human capital 139
Browse all tags
Reporter / Admin Login

August 28, 2016

More Bad Economic Development Deals

Two economic development projects announced this week offer blunt confirmation about the poor state of our local economic development policies in Indiana. The announcements themselves took place in two very different places; Marion (Grant County) and Boone County.

On the face of it, both of these press releases offer the familiar elements of a happy economic development story. In Marion, GM announced a $91 million investment that would preserve 120 jobs in the county. In Boone County, it was Ken’s Foods bringing 150 jobs with $80 million invested. Both firms apparently are eligible for the very successful state EDGE training tax credits that run about $900 in training tax credits per job.

These are probably good jobs. GM didn’t report a wage, but it is likely better than the county average. Ken’s Foods was reported to pay more than $20 an hour, though given the industry and previous announcements, that figure almost certainly includes benefits. According to the Department of Labor, the average wage in Boone County in 2014 was more than $21.30. It is almost assured that the income from these new jobs are actually below the county average. So much for the goal of increasing incomes.

As is often the case, both local governments offered property tax abatements. Fortunately, both deals were for less than the maximum allowable time, and neither project appears to have in place the 25-year ‘super abatements’ that have become a common use of TIF. Still, the numbers should prove a disheartening surprise to taxpayers.

Boone County offered a four-year tax abatement, which they claimed was worth about $4.2 million, to Ken’s Foods. I think that tax calculation a bit optimistic, but even at that estimate, the cost to local taxpayers is $28,000 per job.  Marion offered a worse deal, with a five-year tax abatement. At the countywide effective property tax rate, that means the taxpayers of Marion are paying GM between $60,000 and $70,000 per job with this deal.

To be fair, Boone County and Marion are vastly different in their economic prospects. For the foreseeable future Boone County will continue to grow, while Marion will continue to shrink. Boone County has been successful in attracting families, with good schools and other amenities. Marion has more jobs than workers willing to live in Grant County. That includes most of the jobs saved in this deal.

I am modestly conservative on fiscal matters, and am mightily pleased as both an economist and citizen that Indiana has made itself such an attractive place for business. Unfortunately, deals like these treat communities like cheap commodities. Indiana has arguably the strongest business climate ranking in the nation, yet places think it wise to subsidize new jobs at the expense of existing taxpayers. So much for business acumen on local economic development boards.

These deals are stark evidence of an economic development approach that enriches investors and consulting firms, but does nothing to improve Indiana’s overall economy. It is well past time for Indiana to have a full and honest discussion about making Indiana’s local economic development policies work for all Hoosiers.

Link to this commentary: https://commentaries.cberdata.org/853/more-bad-economic-development-deals

Tags: economic development, incentives, indiana


About the Author

Michael Hicks cberdirector@bsu.edu

Michael J. Hicks, PhD, is the director of the Center for Business and Economic Research and the George and Frances Ball distinguished professor of economics in the Miller College of Business at Ball State University. Note: The views expressed here are solely those of the author, and do not represent those of funders, associations, any entity of Ball State University, or its governing body.

© Center for Business and Economic Research, Ball State University

About Ball State CBER Data Center

Ball State CBER Data Center is one-stop shop for economic data including demographics, education, health, and social capital. Our easy-to-use, visual web tools offer data collection and analysis for grant writers, economic developers, policy makers, and the general public.

Ball State CBER Data Center (cberdata.org) is a product of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. CBER's mission is to conduct relevant and timely public policy research on a wide range of economic issues affecting the state and nation. Learn more.

Terms of Service

Center for Business and Economic Research

Ball State University • Whitinger Business Building, room 149
2000 W. University Ave.
Muncie, IN 47306-0360
Phone:
765-285-5926
Email:
cber@bsu.edu
Website:
www.bsu.edu/cber
Facebook:
www.facebook.com/BallStateCBER
Twitter:
www.twitter.com/BallStateCBER
Close