Center for Business and Economic Research - Ball State University


CBER Data Center
Projects and PublicationsEconomic IndicatorsWeekly CommentaryCommunity Asset InventoryManufacturing Scorecard

About

Commentaries are published weekly and distributed through the Indianapolis Business Journal and many other print and online publications. Disclaimer

RSS Feed

Disclaimer

The views expressed in these commentaries do not reflect those of Ball State University or the Center for Business and Economic Research.

Recent

Remote Work Through the Eyes of Three 20-SomethingsRemote work is here to stay.

Remote Work and Labor MarketsThere are more remote workers today than there are immigrants in the U.S.

The Amish in IndianaIt is hard not to draw similarities between the Amish and newer immigrant groups.

Subsidizing Builders Fixes the Wrong Housing ProblemRemote workers and their families can now live wherever they wish.

View archives

Top Tags

jobs and employment 227
economics 175
education 145
economic development 143
state and local government 123
taxes 122
finance 108
recession 100
budget and spending 100
indiana 99
Browse all tags
Reporter / Admin Login

December 1, 2008

Budget Realities Call for Painful Choices

During the coming weeks a number of Indiana cities and counties are coming to terms with their new budget realities. The property tax caps which will be phased-in over the next two years have prompted discussion of “economic emergency” declarations. I have seen this before, while working at a university in a town that dabbled with bankruptcy for a full three years before coming to grips with a bloated budget. 

The sad truth is that shrinking pains can be as difficult as growing pains, without the soothing balm of a certain happy outcome. Many communities in the Midwest are shrinking. That need not mean life will get worse for their citizens. Smaller, but more prosperous cities are possible. But that requires that community leaders, elected and otherwise, come to grips with the alternatives the future offers. This will take the courage to do what is right, not simply what wins the next election. 

In too many Hoosier communities, an attachment to the past has seriously hindered economic and community development. The property tax alarms that arose last year were caused by ineffective and bloated government in many locations throughout the state. Those communities now feeling the pain of budget cuts created unsustainable conditions. These are the places in which businesses and residents fled. 

The town I used to live in faced bankruptcy. Its tax base had dwindled, property taxes were high, local services were expensive and ineffectual. In the first year of precarious circumstances, many in leadership were unable to face the music. Instead of warning their constituents (the loudest of whom were city employees), they simply begged the state for help. That came to naught and they muddled by until the second year. By then, the reality of self determination struck home. They increased taxes, to include a non-resident income tax. Business fled the city in droves. This has been happening in many Hoosier cities for two decades. 

In year three they cut the budget. The city dramatically cut public safety employment to come in line with national norms. They trimmed non-essential services and they privatized trash collection. Throughout the process they thought carefully about quality of life issues, investing in parks and other amenities. The city emerged much stronger as a result. It still has its troubles but its direction of change is now for the better.

Over the next two years I expect the same scenario will play out in Indiana. In countless places the city council and mayor will wrestle with tough issues. Council meetings will be scenes of participative democracy. This will lead to a struggle between those who cling desperately to a distant past and those who boldly embrace the future. This year we’ll hear lots of debates about the need for new taxes. Many will turn to the state for help. But the fact that new revenues won’t cover costs will force tough budget cuts. But the earlier the budget reality is confronted, the less painful the choices.

Link to this commentary: https://commentaries.cberdata.org/85/budget-realities-call-for-painful-choices

Tags: finance, economic development


About the Author

Michael Hicks cberdirector@bsu.edu

Michael J. Hicks, PhD, is the director of the Center for Business and Economic Research and the George and Frances Ball distinguished professor of economics in the Miller College of Business at Ball State University. Hicks earned doctoral and master’s degrees in economics from the University of Tennessee and a bachelor’s degree in economics from Virginia Military Institute. He has authored two books and more than 60 scholarly works focusing on state and local public policy, including tax and expenditure policy and the impact of Wal-Mart on local economies.

© Center for Business and Economic Research, Ball State University

About Ball State CBER Data Center

Ball State CBER Data Center is one-stop shop for economic data including demographics, education, health, and social capital. Our easy-to-use, visual web tools offer data collection and analysis for grant writers, economic developers, policy makers, and the general public.

Ball State CBER Data Center (cberdata.org) is a product of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. CBER's mission is to conduct relevant and timely public policy research on a wide range of economic issues affecting the state and nation. Learn more.

Terms of Service

Center for Business and Economic Research

Ball State University • Whitinger Business Building, room 149
2000 W. University Ave.
Muncie, IN 47306-0360
Phone:
765-285-5926
Email:
cber@bsu.edu
Website:
www.bsu.edu/cber
Facebook:
www.facebook.com/BallStateCBER
Twitter:
www.twitter.com/BallStateCBER
Close