Center for Business and Economic Research - Ball State University


CBER Data Center
Projects and PublicationsEconomic IndicatorsWeekly CommentaryCommunity Asset InventoryManufacturing Scorecard

About

Commentaries are published weekly and distributed through the Indianapolis Business Journal and many other print and online publications. Disclaimer

RSS Feed

Disclaimer

The views expressed in these commentaries do not reflect those of Ball State University or the Center for Business and Economic Research.

Recent

Trump’s Tariff Recession Is HereMy new forecast, completed in late April, predicts a national recession began as early as March in reaction to Trump’s tarriffs.

Two Key Economic Lessons in One BillHoosiers face trade-offs and opportunity costs in the wake of SEA1.

Time to Fix Economic Development PolicyAllocating tax dollars to land development won’t cause economic growth.

The Unanticipated Effects of SB1Businesses, governments and households may all feel the effects.

View archives

Top Tags

jobs and employment 261
economics 201
state and local government 188
education 186
economic development 171
indiana 171
budget and spending 145
taxes 144
law and public policy 142
workforce and human capital 139
Browse all tags
Reporter / Admin Login

December 29, 2009

Bailout is the Prelude to Bankruptcy

The GM and Chrysler bailout announced on December 19th will keep the two auto makers in business until spring. This is great a gift of time for the new administration.

Many argue that closure of GM and Chrysler will cost lots of U.S. jobs – but bankruptcy does not mean closure. Indeed, the purpose for bankruptcy laws is so that a company can continue to operate while it fixes the problems that made it unprofitable in the first place. Some also argue that bankruptcy will cause buyers to shun GM and Chrysler because of fears of a valueless warranty. This is silly. Once the bailout talks began, only irrational buyers expected the companies to avoid bankruptcy. The damage here has been done (and recent sales data from GM and Chrysler suggest there aren’t many irrational buyers). Despite its claims, this bailout won’t fix the problems at GM and Chrysler. I think a bankruptcy of these companies is nearly inevitable. It might also spell the demise of the UAW. Here’s why.

A very rapid paced set of contract negotiations should now be under way. For GM and Chrysler to avoid bankruptcy, the companies are going to have to emerge from this process looking a lot like Honda and Toyota. They need to make high quality, energy efficient, low priced cars and be able to pay back significant debt. However, there are now five groups of folks involved in the negotiations: taxpayers, stockholders, dealers, workers and the UAW.

It is unclear who will represent the taxpayers (I vote for Dick Cheney). Shareholders, who own the company, should be represented by the Board of Directors, though it is difficult to see how the Board has been effectively representing shareholders as their stock dropped to the value of a cup of coffee today. Dealers are simply in a bad spot. At least the negotiating goals for all these groups are obvious.

Workers and the UAW are also involved in the negotiations. The problem is that the goals of the workers and the goals of the UAW differ significantly and labor costs are at the heart of the problem.

I assume that workers at GM and Chrysler want to keep their jobs. Any negotiation which places their best interests at heart will keep them working. While there will be concessions on fringe benefits and working conditions the folks at the factory could emerge from this with only modest changes.

The problem is that in order to stay relevant, the UAW cannot allow this. To become competitive, both GM and Chrysler have to get rid of job banks, ease a greater share of health care and pension costs to workers, and have more flexibility in their labor contracts. In short, they have to craft a company that is as competitive as the foreign imports. The real question is whether, once UAW workers have contracts that are the same as their non-unionized neighbors they will still want to pay union dues?

Link to this commentary: https://commentaries.cberdata.org/81/bailout-is-the-prelude-to-bankruptcy

Tags: auto industry


About the Author

Michael Hicks cberdirector@bsu.edu

Michael J. Hicks, PhD, is the director of the Center for Business and Economic Research and the George and Frances Ball distinguished professor of economics in the Miller College of Business at Ball State University. Note: The views expressed here are solely those of the author, and do not represent those of funders, associations, any entity of Ball State University, or its governing body.

© Center for Business and Economic Research, Ball State University

About Ball State CBER Data Center

Ball State CBER Data Center is one-stop shop for economic data including demographics, education, health, and social capital. Our easy-to-use, visual web tools offer data collection and analysis for grant writers, economic developers, policy makers, and the general public.

Ball State CBER Data Center (cberdata.org) is a product of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. CBER's mission is to conduct relevant and timely public policy research on a wide range of economic issues affecting the state and nation. Learn more.

Terms of Service

Center for Business and Economic Research

Ball State University • Whitinger Business Building, room 149
2000 W. University Ave.
Muncie, IN 47306-0360
Phone:
765-285-5926
Email:
cber@bsu.edu
Website:
www.bsu.edu/cber
Facebook:
www.facebook.com/BallStateCBER
Twitter:
www.twitter.com/BallStateCBER
Close