Center for Business and Economic Research - Ball State University


CBER Data Center
Projects and PublicationsEconomic IndicatorsWeekly CommentaryCommunity Asset InventoryManufacturing Scorecard

About

Commentaries are published weekly and distributed through the Indianapolis Business Journal and many other print and online publications. Disclaimer

RSS Feed

Disclaimer

The views expressed in these commentaries do not reflect those of Ball State University or the Center for Business and Economic Research.

Recent

Educational Attainment, the 21st Century Fund and the Future of SchoolingIndiana ranks 42nd in educational attainment.

Big Savings for Ending Prevailing WageMy statistical models show that repealing state prevailing wage laws save taxpayers money.

Re-Thinking Economic Development A large share of the most mobile families—perhaps half—no longer need to live near where they work.

Money Illusion and InflationPrice fluctuation could cause inflation to last longer, but it didn’t cause the inflation, it simply extends the pain.

View archives

Top Tags

jobs and employment 230
economics 178
education 148
economic development 146
state and local government 129
taxes 123
finance 109
indiana 105
budget and spending 104
migration and population change 104
Browse all tags
Reporter / Admin Login

February 1, 2015

Sunday Sales Proposal Needs a Closer Look

The legislature will be taking up the issue of Sunday alcohol sales this session. At the outset, I want to lay out my biases and clearly state that I think it silly to tell adults where and when they can purchase an entirely legal substance that has a 4,000-year cultural history. It is even more senseless to prohibit the sale of wine that would be used in communion on the day it would be used. But there is a lot more to the story than the repeal of an inane Blue Law.

Like all states, Indiana has regulated alcohol sales since the end of prohibition. The Sunday sales of retail alcoholic beverages may be the most visible relic of prohibition, but it is hardly the only one. Package liquor stores remain highly regulated. They are limited to the type of items they may sell, the places they locate, the age of employees, the hours they can remain open and the type of ownership structure they can operate under.

In short, the regulation of alcoholic beverages in Indiana contains a vast web of laws that apply differently to different types of businesses. Over the past 80 years firms across Indiana have in good faith made investment and location decisions based upon these laws.

Now the legislature proposes to eliminate one of these laws under the belief that to do so would increase market competition, leveling the playing field between liquor store owners and other retailers. If only the issue were this simple; I would be an adamant supporter of the law. The truth is a bit different.

Eliminating the prohibition on Sunday alcohol sales will not improve competition between package liquor stores and other retailers. Instead it will clearly shift the balance to other retailers with the primary beneficiary being big box and convenience stores. There are consequences of this.

In 2009 a colleague and I tested the effect of ending Sunday sales on the package store industry using data from all fifty states over the past few decades. The result was, though overall alcohol sales remained unchanged, about one in four package stores closed. If this law passes in Indiana, we should expect much the same effect. All the lost sales in package stores will be made up at stores that are not bound by the remaining restrictive laws governing package stores.

As Indiana legislators debate Sunday alcohol sales they should know what it is they are voting on. While a part of the legislation laudably dismantles a bad idea from nearly a century ago, the proposed law is dangerously incomplete. To be clear, this law is not an extension of free markets. It instead lessens competition by leaving in place too many restrictions on existing package stores.

Indiana has much work to do on our laws concerning alcoholic beverages, but perhaps the biggest mistake we can make is to dismantle them piecemeal. This will only punish Indiana-owned businesses, while doing nothing to unleash the benefits of free markets for beer, wine and liquor.­

Link to this commentary: https://commentaries.cberdata.org/771/sunday-sales-proposal-needs-a-closer-look

Tags: private sector, regulation, indiana


About the Author

Michael Hicks cberdirector@bsu.edu

Michael J. Hicks, PhD, is the director of the Center for Business and Economic Research and the George and Frances Ball distinguished professor of economics in the Miller College of Business at Ball State University. Hicks earned doctoral and master’s degrees in economics from the University of Tennessee and a bachelor’s degree in economics from Virginia Military Institute. He has authored two books and more than 60 scholarly works focusing on state and local public policy, including tax and expenditure policy and the impact of Wal-Mart on local economies.

© Center for Business and Economic Research, Ball State University

About Ball State CBER Data Center

Ball State CBER Data Center is one-stop shop for economic data including demographics, education, health, and social capital. Our easy-to-use, visual web tools offer data collection and analysis for grant writers, economic developers, policy makers, and the general public.

Ball State CBER Data Center (cberdata.org) is a product of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. CBER's mission is to conduct relevant and timely public policy research on a wide range of economic issues affecting the state and nation. Learn more.

Terms of Service

Center for Business and Economic Research

Ball State University • Whitinger Business Building, room 149
2000 W. University Ave.
Muncie, IN 47306-0360
Phone:
765-285-5926
Email:
cber@bsu.edu
Website:
www.bsu.edu/cber
Facebook:
www.facebook.com/BallStateCBER
Twitter:
www.twitter.com/BallStateCBER
Close