Center for Business and Economic Research - Ball State University


CBER Data Center
Projects and PublicationsEconomic IndicatorsWeekly CommentaryCommunity Asset InventoryManufacturing Scorecard

About

Commentaries are published weekly and distributed through the Indianapolis Business Journal and many other print and online publications. Disclaimer

RSS Feed

Disclaimer

The views expressed in these commentaries do not reflect those of Ball State University or the Center for Business and Economic Research.

Recent

Two Key Economic Lessons in One BillHoosiers face trade-offs and opportunity costs in the wake of SEA1.

Time to Fix Economic Development PolicyAllocating tax dollars to land development won’t cause economic growth.

The Unanticipated Effects of SB1Businesses, governments and households may all feel the effects.

The Stupidest of PoliciesThis whipsawing of tariff rates has unnerved financial markets, which on Wednesday, were toying with a liquidity crisis.

View archives

Top Tags

jobs and employment 261
economics 201
state and local government 188
education 186
indiana 171
economic development 171
budget and spending 145
taxes 144
law and public policy 142
workforce and human capital 139
Browse all tags
Reporter / Admin Login

January 18, 2015

Minimum Wage and Purple Unicorns

There is a lovely little spat about minimum wage legislation going on in my local paper. It pits economic, music, criminology, telecommunications and psychology professors against one another in an entertaining debate.

Now, I don't wish to be mistaken as a peacemaker. These are tenured associate and full professors, all of whom have been professors much longer than I. They are old enough to disagree and be disagreeable. But, it is important to understand what is going on with the minimum wage, especially since a group of Hoosier lawmakers are proposing a 39 percent increase this year. I think both sides are talking past each other.

Economists who study the minimum wage largely agree on its economic effect. Its presence and its increase cause some workers to receive better pay, and some to lose jobs. The extent of these effects depends upon the size of the minimum wage increase relative to market-based wages. Of course market wages are determined by the location of the job, the skill of the worker and the willingness of the business to pay the wage. These market wages are imperfect, but markets set wages.

Because there is such variation in impacts across time and place, economists come down on both sides of the issue. However, one thing every serious analyst agrees upon is that its effects have been small over the years. Perhaps less than one out of every 200 adults works at minimum wage jobs. Those mostly hurt and helped by the minimum wage are teenagers; very, very few of whom live in poverty.

Among the non-economists writing on the opinion page, the entirety of this debate seems about helping those in poverty. This is sweetly naive, and makes me wonder if my academic colleagues wish for sparkly purple unicorns to dance at their faculty meetings.

The minimum wage debate has nothing to do with helping folks in poverty. In fact, it is hard to identify any other public policy that impacts fewer people in poverty than the minimum wage. The minimum wage debate is all about raw political power. There is nothing wrong with political power, of course, but we should not confuse it with dancing unicorns.

The real reason there is such a focus on the minimum age is that any change in it leads to contract renegotiations for most public sector union contracts. Now, there is nothing wrong with public sector workers, nor is there anything wrong with negotiating with them about their salary. We just ought to be honest about how it works.

To be honest, our anti-poverty tools, including the minimum wage are feeble. One good fix would be to dismantle most of the social welfare programs and instead offer a guaranteed income to each family. It’d be cheaper and far more effective. The only problem is that we’d need a lot fewer public sector workers to help administer hundreds of programs. So, expect dancing unicorns long before we hear a proposal like this from the friends of the minimum wage.­

Link to this commentary: https://commentaries.cberdata.org/769/minimum-wage-and-purple-unicorns

Tags: jobs and employment


About the Author

Michael Hicks cberdirector@bsu.edu

Michael J. Hicks, PhD, is the director of the Center for Business and Economic Research and the George and Frances Ball distinguished professor of economics in the Miller College of Business at Ball State University. Note: The views expressed here are solely those of the author, and do not represent those of funders, associations, any entity of Ball State University, or its governing body.

© Center for Business and Economic Research, Ball State University

About Ball State CBER Data Center

Ball State CBER Data Center is one-stop shop for economic data including demographics, education, health, and social capital. Our easy-to-use, visual web tools offer data collection and analysis for grant writers, economic developers, policy makers, and the general public.

Ball State CBER Data Center (cberdata.org) is a product of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. CBER's mission is to conduct relevant and timely public policy research on a wide range of economic issues affecting the state and nation. Learn more.

Terms of Service

Center for Business and Economic Research

Ball State University • Whitinger Business Building, room 149
2000 W. University Ave.
Muncie, IN 47306-0360
Phone:
765-285-5926
Email:
cber@bsu.edu
Website:
www.bsu.edu/cber
Facebook:
www.facebook.com/BallStateCBER
Twitter:
www.twitter.com/BallStateCBER
Close