Center for Business and Economic Research - Ball State University


CBER Data Center
Projects and PublicationsEconomic IndicatorsWeekly CommentaryCommunity Asset InventoryManufacturing Scorecard

About

Commentaries are published weekly and distributed through the Indianapolis Business Journal and many other print and online publications. Disclaimer

RSS Feed

Disclaimer

The views expressed in these commentaries do not reflect those of Ball State University or the Center for Business and Economic Research.

Recent

Economic Freedom Is Essential, but It Isn’t Just TaxesBusinesses and households prioritize standard of living among other factors.

The Labor Demand Shocks of Artificial IntelligenceThe unseen part of technology is how humans adapt it to complement their innate skills.

Misdiagnosing Housing ProblemsThe housing market faces a mix of supply-side and demand-side issues.

Previewing the Long-Term Effects of TariffsThe dominant effect of the Trump tariffs will be to raise production costs on almost every American manufacturing firm.

View archives

Top Tags

jobs and employment 264
economics 205
education 189
state and local government 189
indiana 175
economic development 173
taxes 147
budget and spending 147
law and public policy 145
workforce and human capital 141
Browse all tags
Reporter / Admin Login

August 10, 2014

Corporate Tax Inversion

Corporations are among our oldest institutions. Something like a joint stock company probably triggered the earliest formal written communication—the accounting ledger. It should be unsurprising that the early traders of Mesopotamia used a corporation. Trade was risky outside the walled city, and spreading that risk over many households allowed for the collection of enough financial capital to pay for prime trade goods, fast mounts and armed guards.

This risky trade had to pay better than baking bread, and so profits to these traders were higher than those to other merchants. Some folks who are sweetly innocent of the workings of the world think these profits are a nuisance and distraction to the workings of an economy. They should be quietly ignored until human nature changes.

Over the past few years we hear a great deal about the evilness of corporations, and how they should not be treated, in law, as people. The latter idea deserves some modest discussion. There is symmetry in the law. If we wish to hold corporations liable for infractions of a law, we must also permit them to speak out against laws they judge wrong, or support those they judge right. It is a simple matter really.

Corporations are easy to demagogue, as is now happening as one political party suffers a summer of discontent. In the coming weeks we will hear how evil and unpatriotic it is for American corporations to merge with foreign firms and so dodge U.S. taxes. This is called 'inversion' and according to White House sources will be the target of Mr. Obama's much anticipated spate of executive actions he will undertake just before the election.

The problem is that this administration has long ignored real corporate tax reform, which could have raised more tax dollars and kept more corporations at home. Here's how that might have worked.

There are so many tax loopholes that a fine team of lawyers and accountants can reduce tax liability of many corporations to zero. As I have mentioned before in this space, GE paid less federal income tax last year than did Ball State. That is not a problem with GE's patriotism. It is a problem with political courage and leadership.

U.S. corporate tax rates are the highest in the developed world, but many businesses can find effective loopholes and pay almost nothing. The tax is complicated and unfair, and that is why corporations who cannot find loopholes are moving overseas. Calling them unpatriotic won't work. They can hire patriotic French lawyers to help them move to Paris, where corporate tax rates are lower.

Corporate taxes are viewed by economists as among the least efficient way to collect revenue. To pay these taxes, corporations reduce their payments not only to stockholders but also workers. Some studies suggest 70 percent of corporate taxes come from wages.

What we need nationally is the type of tax simplification effort that Indiana is now trying. That'll take a bit more political courage and leadership than the current administration can muster.­

Link to this commentary: https://commentaries.cberdata.org/746/corporate-tax-inversion

Tags: taxes, business, law and public policy


About the Author

Michael Hicks cberdirector@bsu.edu

Michael J. Hicks, PhD, is the director of the Center for Business and Economic Research and the George and Frances Ball distinguished professor of economics in the Miller College of Business at Ball State University. Note: The views expressed here are solely those of the author, and do not represent those of funders, associations, any entity of Ball State University, or its governing body.

© Center for Business and Economic Research, Ball State University

About Ball State CBER Data Center

Ball State CBER Data Center is one-stop shop for economic data including demographics, education, health, and social capital. Our easy-to-use, visual web tools offer data collection and analysis for grant writers, economic developers, policy makers, and the general public.

Ball State CBER Data Center (cberdata.org) is a product of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. CBER's mission is to conduct relevant and timely public policy research on a wide range of economic issues affecting the state and nation. Learn more.

Terms of Service

Center for Business and Economic Research

Ball State University • Whitinger Business Building, room 149
2000 W. University Ave.
Muncie, IN 47306-0360
Phone:
765-285-5926
Email:
cber@bsu.edu
Website:
www.bsu.edu/cber
Facebook:
www.facebook.com/BallStateCBER
Twitter:
www.twitter.com/BallStateCBER
Close