Center for Business and Economic Research - Ball State University


CBER Data Center
Projects and PublicationsEconomic IndicatorsWeekly CommentaryCommunity Asset InventoryManufacturing Scorecard

About

Commentaries are published weekly and distributed through the Indianapolis Business Journal and many other print and online publications. Disclaimer

RSS Feed

Disclaimer

The views expressed in these commentaries do not reflect those of Ball State University or the Center for Business and Economic Research.

Recent

Manufacturing Matters, but Not for Creating JobsManufacturing is important because it is the source of a significant share of regional productivity growth.

The ‘Great Discordance’ of Economic Fact and FeelingThat Americans appear to prefer higher unemployment over historically mild inflation is not something any of us should be proud of.

The Best of ThanksgivingsWhether in times of peace or distress, we always find time to give thanks.

Are We in a Period of New Union Activism?The bigger effect of unions appears to be how they influence labor markets outside the firms in which they’ve organized.

View archives

Top Tags

jobs and employment 241
economics 182
education 156
economic development 154
state and local government 144
taxes 126
indiana 121
budget and spending 114
finance 111
migration and population change 110
Browse all tags
Reporter / Admin Login

March 30, 2009

Incentive Paybacks Keep Players Honest

I have spent a disproportionate amount of my time thinking about tax incentives to business. The result has been one book, and a whole slew of academic papers (the type with Greek letters, and extensive mathematical notation that are so helpful in putting toddlers to sleep). As a result I have read with keen interest a proposal in the Indiana House that affects the State tax incentive program.

House Bill 1338 introduces a change to many (but not all) of our State’s tax incentives, adding what is known as a clawback provision. This requires businesses that receive tax incentives but have not met their stated jobs or investment goals to repay all or part of these incentives. By my count more than 20 states currently have clawback provisions, and I believe it is a growing trend. But by my reckoning, this is a piece of legislation that offers a reasonable and fair adjustment to our current tax incentives. Here’s why.

Economists who have studied tax incentives have not found much to praise. I think this is for three reasons. First, nationwide the use of tax incentives has been ill documented and poorly executed. Even if they have been successful (and certainly many have been, the data is often too poor to analyze results. Second, firms have a huge incentive to misrepresent their plans. Firms that are ruthlessly truthful about their investment and job creation expectations may be at a real disadvantage when facing those who tell a less honest story. A very important study of Ohio firms in the 1990s found that firms that received tax incentives produced far fewer jobs than they promised than those who did not receive the incentives. Finally, most incentives are really only traditional infrastructure investments that the state or local governments would make under any circumstances. They are simply part of good state and local government masquerading as a ‘business incentive.’

Indiana has a superb reputation regarding tax incentives. The state is careful, limited and transparent with their provision of tax incentives. They go to very few firms, and only those that are truly ‘footloose’ (unlike California and West Virginia that give millions of dollars to big box retailers). The folks at a group known as “Good Jobs First” a union financed incentive watchdog give Indiana an A grade in the transparency of their program. Despite the care and limitations of our programs, we do very well in business attraction. We can still be more prudent.

The clawback provisions in HB 1338 are reasonable. The required repayment of incentives by firms that do not meet their commitments places only a modest burden on new businesses. This bill keeps Indiana in the group of honest players when it comes to tax incentives. That is where we need to stay.

Link to this commentary: https://commentaries.cberdata.org/69/incentive-paybacks-keep-players-honest

Tags: taxes


About the Author

Michael Hicks cberdirector@bsu.edu

Michael J. Hicks, PhD, is the director of the Center for Business and Economic Research and the George and Frances Ball distinguished professor of economics in the Miller College of Business at Ball State University. Hicks earned doctoral and master’s degrees in economics from the University of Tennessee and a bachelor’s degree in economics from Virginia Military Institute. He has authored two books and more than 60 scholarly works focusing on state and local public policy, including tax and expenditure policy and the impact of Wal-Mart on local economies.

© Center for Business and Economic Research, Ball State University

About Ball State CBER Data Center

Ball State CBER Data Center is one-stop shop for economic data including demographics, education, health, and social capital. Our easy-to-use, visual web tools offer data collection and analysis for grant writers, economic developers, policy makers, and the general public.

Ball State CBER Data Center (cberdata.org) is a product of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. CBER's mission is to conduct relevant and timely public policy research on a wide range of economic issues affecting the state and nation. Learn more.

Terms of Service

Center for Business and Economic Research

Ball State University • Whitinger Business Building, room 149
2000 W. University Ave.
Muncie, IN 47306-0360
Phone:
765-285-5926
Email:
cber@bsu.edu
Website:
www.bsu.edu/cber
Facebook:
www.facebook.com/BallStateCBER
Twitter:
www.twitter.com/BallStateCBER
Close