Center for Business and Economic Research - Ball State University


CBER Data Center
Projects and PublicationsEconomic IndicatorsWeekly CommentaryCommunity Asset InventoryManufacturing Scorecard

About

Commentaries are published weekly and distributed through the Indianapolis Business Journal and many other print and online publications. Disclaimer

RSS Feed

Disclaimer

The views expressed in these commentaries do not reflect those of Ball State University or the Center for Business and Economic Research.

Recent

Some Easy (and Not So Easy) Spending Cuts for the Next BudgetEach of the 50 states vary in tax collection, public services and benefits.

More Bad News About Hoosier College AttendanceLow educational attainment not only dooms a location to slow growth, but also it makes a place less attractive to college graduates.

It’s Stagflation, Not InflationTariffs work differently than inflation.

A Golden Age of Economic ColumnistsThe recent mayoral primaries in NYC provide plentiful material for discussion.

View archives

Top Tags

jobs and employment 267
economics 209
state and local government 193
education 192
indiana 178
economic development 175
taxes 151
law and public policy 151
budget and spending 150
workforce and human capital 144
Browse all tags
Reporter / Admin Login

June 16, 2013

Good News on Manufacturing in 2013

I am always reluctant to fill this column with my recent research, but this week's release of the annual Conexus Indiana Manufacturing and Logistics Report (available at www.conexus.cberdata.org) begs comment.  The scorecard itself had just a few surprises.  Indiana did much better in the cost of worker benefits, and continued to lead in the size of manufacturing and logistics.  We also report that Indiana ranked third overall in the pace of manufacturing recovery since the end of the Great Recession, trailing only the tiny manufacturing states of Alaska and North Dakota, whose energy production has propelled their growth.

Our human capital scores took a surprising downturn, but the problem is a good one to have.  The classes who entered community colleges in 2007 saw graduation rates dropping by 3.8 percent.  This would typically be a worry, since improving graduation rates is the key to our long-term prosperity, but there's a clear and happy reason for this anomaly.  Enrollment growth in these schools jumped from 25th to 1st place during the recession years (and has subsequently returned to trend).  Unsurprisingly, some of these students have yet to graduate; in fact, with enrollment growing more than 15 percent a year during the recession, we should have seen a far deeper drop in graduation rates. Over the next two or three years, the spike in associate degree students we experienced during the Great Recession will boost our human capital, and hence our grades.  In the short term, it placed huge stress on our public and private community colleges.

The most interesting part of our manufacturing research this year was revelations on productivity growth in Indiana.  The downturn took a heavy toll on our manufacturing of big ticket items (cars and trucks), which are high value-added goods.  This left us with a greater share of low value-added production of commodity-type products, and so reduced our ranking slightly.  However, there's an even richer story about manufacturing productivity over the past decade that we reported this week.  Manufacturing productivity consists of four things: technology growth, plant and equipment, workers and something economists call 'total factor productivity.' This TFP is growth that cannot be explained by other factors.  It is really the sole source of economic growth in a developed economy. 

In the pre-recession Bubble Days, productivity growth in manufacturing nationally was led by new capital investments.  Labor productivity and TFP shrank, likely due to the effects of the bubble, which kept open too many uncompetitive factories.  Another possible cause is that many factories restructured their production process in the last decade to take advantage of broad investments in Information Technology.  This temporarily reduced TFP.  Since the start of the recession, TFP rebounded and has accelerated within the manufacturing since the end of the recession.  This is a major turnaround from the last decade. Moreover, Indiana leads this productivity growth within the Midwest, and ranks high nationally.  This is a clear bit of good news for the most manufacturing-intensive state in the union.

Link to this commentary: https://commentaries.cberdata.org/681/good-news-on-manufacturing-in-2013

Tags: manufacturing, economic recovery


About the Author

Michael Hicks cberdirector@bsu.edu

Michael J. Hicks, PhD, is the director of the Center for Business and Economic Research and the George and Frances Ball distinguished professor of economics in the Miller College of Business at Ball State University. Note: The views expressed here are solely those of the author, and do not represent those of funders, associations, any entity of Ball State University, or its governing body.

© Center for Business and Economic Research, Ball State University

About Ball State CBER Data Center

Ball State CBER Data Center is one-stop shop for economic data including demographics, education, health, and social capital. Our easy-to-use, visual web tools offer data collection and analysis for grant writers, economic developers, policy makers, and the general public.

Ball State CBER Data Center (cberdata.org) is a product of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. CBER's mission is to conduct relevant and timely public policy research on a wide range of economic issues affecting the state and nation. Learn more.

Terms of Service

Center for Business and Economic Research

Ball State University • Whitinger Business Building, room 149
2000 W. University Ave.
Muncie, IN 47306-0360
Phone:
765-285-5926
Email:
cber@bsu.edu
Website:
www.bsu.edu/cber
Facebook:
www.facebook.com/BallStateCBER
Twitter:
www.twitter.com/BallStateCBER
Close