Center for Business and Economic Research - Ball State University


CBER Data Center
Projects and PublicationsEconomic IndicatorsWeekly CommentaryCommunity Asset InventoryManufacturing Scorecard

About

Commentaries are published weekly and distributed through the Indianapolis Business Journal and many other print and online publications. Disclaimer

RSS Feed

Disclaimer

The views expressed in these commentaries do not reflect those of Ball State University or the Center for Business and Economic Research.

Recent

Two Key Economic Lessons in One BillHoosiers face trade-offs and opportunity costs in the wake of SEA1.

Time to Fix Economic Development PolicyAllocating tax dollars to land development won’t cause economic growth.

The Unanticipated Effects of SB1Businesses, governments and households may all feel the effects.

The Stupidest of PoliciesThis whipsawing of tariff rates has unnerved financial markets, which on Wednesday, were toying with a liquidity crisis.

View archives

Top Tags

jobs and employment 261
economics 201
state and local government 188
education 186
economic development 171
indiana 171
budget and spending 145
taxes 144
law and public policy 142
workforce and human capital 139
Browse all tags
Reporter / Admin Login

June 9, 2013

Nice Places Grow Faster

I think by now most people understand that differences in population growth, and therefore economic growth, between regions are due to differences in amenities such as schools, parks, the cityscape and natural attractions.  While the link between economic performance and local schools is self-evident, I am often asked to explain why having more and better local amenities matters to job creation.  It is a simple concept, really.

Households (aka families) make choices about where to live based upon a variety of factors.  Among them are the presence of things such as playgrounds, safe and attractive neighborhoods and recreational activities. Abundant research also reveals that workers in these households are willing to sacrifice to obtain these things.  They are willing to commute long distances and even forego higher wages to live in nice places.  We economists call these sacrifices 'compensating differentials' and this will be important later in this column.

Businesses like to locate in places where they can be more profitable, not just where costs are lower.  The nicer places that households favor also possess higher land costs and typically higher tax rates. This will weigh heavily on profitability for some firms. However, these places pack in more people and thus they boost profitability for businesses that need local consumers.  They also reduce hiring costs and let businesses take advantage of the well-known productivity increase in urban areas (we economists call this agglomeration). 

The interaction between the location choices of businesses and households would seem to be a complex dance among these factors; however, there are a couple of matters that bring amenities to the forefront.

First, the fastest growing businesses in the nation, those who do the most hiring and pay the best wages, care little about land costs.  It is people that matter.  The high land costs and property tax costs figure only modestly in their location calculus.  This gives a growing edge to places that can attract lots of people, but there is an even bigger factor at play.

The thirst for amenities is whetted by wealth. Unsurprisingly, higher income households are willing and able to spend more to live in nicer places.  These higher income households are not so by accident, but rather because of more education and skills.  Workers from these households are more prized by businesses, which is why they are paid better.  Now remember that these are the same households willing to accept a higher 'compensating differential' to live in a nicer place.  This means that they will take lower wages and pay higher home prices to live, work and shop in a higher quality community. That boosts business profits and can more than offset land prices and higher taxes.  This creates a virtuous cycle where nice places grow and not-so-nice places shrink.

Link to this commentary: https://commentaries.cberdata.org/680/nice-places-grow-faster

Tags: economic recovery, profits


About the Author

Michael Hicks cberdirector@bsu.edu

Michael J. Hicks, PhD, is the director of the Center for Business and Economic Research and the George and Frances Ball distinguished professor of economics in the Miller College of Business at Ball State University. Note: The views expressed here are solely those of the author, and do not represent those of funders, associations, any entity of Ball State University, or its governing body.

© Center for Business and Economic Research, Ball State University

About Ball State CBER Data Center

Ball State CBER Data Center is one-stop shop for economic data including demographics, education, health, and social capital. Our easy-to-use, visual web tools offer data collection and analysis for grant writers, economic developers, policy makers, and the general public.

Ball State CBER Data Center (cberdata.org) is a product of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. CBER's mission is to conduct relevant and timely public policy research on a wide range of economic issues affecting the state and nation. Learn more.

Terms of Service

Center for Business and Economic Research

Ball State University • Whitinger Business Building, room 149
2000 W. University Ave.
Muncie, IN 47306-0360
Phone:
765-285-5926
Email:
cber@bsu.edu
Website:
www.bsu.edu/cber
Facebook:
www.facebook.com/BallStateCBER
Twitter:
www.twitter.com/BallStateCBER
Close