Center for Business and Economic Research - Ball State University


CBER Data Center
Projects and PublicationsEconomic IndicatorsWeekly CommentaryCommunity Asset InventoryManufacturing Scorecard

About

Commentaries are published weekly and distributed through the Indianapolis Business Journal and many other print and online publications. Disclaimer

RSS Feed

Disclaimer

The views expressed in these commentaries do not reflect those of Ball State University or the Center for Business and Economic Research.

Recent

Two Key Economic Lessons in One BillHoosiers face trade-offs and opportunity costs in the wake of SEA1.

Time to Fix Economic Development PolicyAllocating tax dollars to land development won’t cause economic growth.

The Unanticipated Effects of SB1Businesses, governments and households may all feel the effects.

The Stupidest of PoliciesThis whipsawing of tariff rates has unnerved financial markets, which on Wednesday, were toying with a liquidity crisis.

View archives

Top Tags

jobs and employment 261
economics 201
state and local government 188
education 186
indiana 171
economic development 171
budget and spending 145
taxes 144
law and public policy 142
workforce and human capital 139
Browse all tags
Reporter / Admin Login

September 16, 2012

Corporations and Greed

A reader recently suggested that I write a critique of corporations akin to that offered for unions.  That is a fine idea, and I begin with a couple points.  My observation about private sector unions was simply that their declining membership marked them for imminent irrelevancy.  This is a concern that is shared, if not admitted, by the union’s own leadership.  Whatever mischief private sector unions do or do not engage in, it is mostly a private affair.  That makes it ripe for political, not policy, action.  I write about the latter.  In contrast, public sector unions have left hundreds of American municipalities on the brink of bankruptcy.  That is a policy matter, and I will continue to remark upon it. 

The point is that I have little to say about private unions and public policy.   It is likewise with corporations, whose ill behavior is a matter among consenting adults who either own or work for corporations.  Still, it is useful to inventory some of these critiques and assess their reason.

Corporations differ from other business in that their ownership is diffused across people who have purchased shares of the company.  Karl Marx referred to these owners as capitalists.  It is a sweet and satisfying irony that today more than 60 percent of U.S. households own stock at some point.  Most of these capitalists are like me and simply buy retirement mutual funds.  We own tiny portions of hundreds of companies.

This diffuse ownership offers the only coherent criticism of modern corporations.  Writing in the 1930s, two economists, Berle and Means, noted that the divergence of interests between owners of corporations and their management led to decisions that enriched the management team at the expense of owners.  In another irony, this led to executive compensation reforms that linked CEO pay to stock performance, enabling the wild bonuses of corporate executives.  This may be a problem, but it is a matter between owners and managers, not government

Corporations, like business and labor in general, lobby for special tax breaks and government favors.  Corporations, like other businesses and households, sometimes pollute, sometimes treat employees poorly and sometimes make poor products.  Markets and, on rare occasions, government can help some of this, but singling out corporations is silly—perhaps because corporations are easy to malign.  Real-life company presidents are never as heartless as their faceless corporate brethren. The Occupy Wall Street movement is especially fond of criticizing corporations, mostly for greed.  Ironically again, a common source of youthful outrage among the OWS crowd is that corporations are treated like people by the tax and legal codes (a simplifying measure in a tax and legal code that revels in false complexity).  What strikes me is the childlike simplicity of these OWS folks who cry against corporate greed, but then howl against the trivial legal treatment of corporations as people.  In isolation, either argument has merit, but greed is a wholly human sin.  So if corporations are truly greedy, we must treat them like people.

Link to this commentary: https://commentaries.cberdata.org/641/corporations-and-greed

Tags: business


About the Author

Michael Hicks cberdirector@bsu.edu

Michael J. Hicks, PhD, is the director of the Center for Business and Economic Research and the George and Frances Ball distinguished professor of economics in the Miller College of Business at Ball State University. Note: The views expressed here are solely those of the author, and do not represent those of funders, associations, any entity of Ball State University, or its governing body.

© Center for Business and Economic Research, Ball State University

About Ball State CBER Data Center

Ball State CBER Data Center is one-stop shop for economic data including demographics, education, health, and social capital. Our easy-to-use, visual web tools offer data collection and analysis for grant writers, economic developers, policy makers, and the general public.

Ball State CBER Data Center (cberdata.org) is a product of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. CBER's mission is to conduct relevant and timely public policy research on a wide range of economic issues affecting the state and nation. Learn more.

Terms of Service

Center for Business and Economic Research

Ball State University • Whitinger Business Building, room 149
2000 W. University Ave.
Muncie, IN 47306-0360
Phone:
765-285-5926
Email:
cber@bsu.edu
Website:
www.bsu.edu/cber
Facebook:
www.facebook.com/BallStateCBER
Twitter:
www.twitter.com/BallStateCBER
Close