Center for Business and Economic Research - Ball State University


CBER Data Center
Projects and PublicationsEconomic IndicatorsWeekly CommentaryCommunity Asset InventoryManufacturing Scorecard

About

Commentaries are published weekly and distributed through the Indianapolis Business Journal and many other print and online publications. Disclaimer

RSS Feed

Disclaimer

The views expressed in these commentaries do not reflect those of Ball State University or the Center for Business and Economic Research.

Recent

Bank Failures Warn of Deeper Economic ProblemsDuring the Great Recession, a whopping 0.014 percent of banks were closed by the FDIC.

Remote Work Through the Eyes of Three 20-SomethingsRemote work is here to stay.

Remote Work and Labor MarketsThere are more remote workers today than there are immigrants in the U.S.

The Amish in IndianaIt is hard not to draw similarities between the Amish and newer immigrant groups.

View archives

Top Tags

jobs and employment 228
economics 176
education 146
economic development 144
state and local government 124
taxes 122
finance 108
budget and spending 100
recession 100
indiana 99
Browse all tags
Reporter / Admin Login

August 13, 2012

Marriage and Chicken Sandwiches

The hullabaloo over gay marriage and Chick-fil-A exposes three astonishing falsehoods of modern political economy that distract us from weightier issues.

The first of these fallacies is simply the mistaken notion that the socially necessary institution of marriage is reasonably within the competency of government to control. The same folks who brought you Solyndra, the Bridge to Nowhere and the current IRS code have no business regulating marriage and no state or local government is better equipped to do so. Quite simply, government ought to remain neutral on the ways in which families organize themselves.  It is for people and religions to decide and design the structure of marriage. In this debate within churches, all voices can be welcome and we as individuals can choose according to conscience.

For the record, I married the same girl twice—once in a civil and once in a church service—and I cannot rationally, or within my heart, oppose gay marriage. I do not know where my church will eventually stand on the matter, but because my denomination has clearly understood the word of Christ on such matters as ‘automatic weapons conversion kits’ and ‘truth in packaging,’ I expect to be entertained by the debate.

The second great fallacy is the notion that ‘progressive leaders’ of some of our great cities possess even modest attachment to the Bill of Rights. The ease with which Rahm Emanual in particular abandoned the First Amendment astonishes the senses. While this step brought swift and certain criticism from many quarters, the Department of Justice has not yet begun an investigation into violations of the civil rights of those who spoke against gay marriage by Chicago city government. Go figure.

Finally, this episode again exposes the swindle that is the corporate social responsibility movement. After a decade and a half of cajoling, entreating and threatening corporations to sign onto an ever widening list of pet causes, the movement is faced with its greatest threat—a company that chooses a cause of conscience that does not fit the CSR movement's play book. While I do not agree with Chick-fil-A's position, it undoubtedly springs from the well of conscience. This comes from a company that is known for treating employees and suppliers well, investing in communities and its workers and closing on Sundays to allow workers to have time with their families. In short, Chick-fil-A is a poster child for corporate social responsibility, yet they oppose one pantheon of the progressive agenda. The CSR folks must be chasing their hairless tails.

Recognizing families of different kinds is a compelling economic issue. This discussion must expose the essence of what government can and should do. It clarifies how the Bill of Rights must frame all matters of governance, big and small, in a republic that has ambitions of permanence. Best of all it exposes the patent silliness of what the corporate social responsibility movement has become. All of this manifests itself in a decision on where chicken sandwiches are sold.

Link to this commentary: https://commentaries.cberdata.org/636/marriage-and-chicken-sandwiches


About the Author

Michael Hicks cberdirector@bsu.edu

Michael J. Hicks, PhD, is the director of the Center for Business and Economic Research and the George and Frances Ball distinguished professor of economics in the Miller College of Business at Ball State University. Hicks earned doctoral and master’s degrees in economics from the University of Tennessee and a bachelor’s degree in economics from Virginia Military Institute. He has authored two books and more than 60 scholarly works focusing on state and local public policy, including tax and expenditure policy and the impact of Wal-Mart on local economies.

© Center for Business and Economic Research, Ball State University

About Ball State CBER Data Center

Ball State CBER Data Center is one-stop shop for economic data including demographics, education, health, and social capital. Our easy-to-use, visual web tools offer data collection and analysis for grant writers, economic developers, policy makers, and the general public.

Ball State CBER Data Center (cberdata.org) is a product of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. CBER's mission is to conduct relevant and timely public policy research on a wide range of economic issues affecting the state and nation. Learn more.

Terms of Service

Center for Business and Economic Research

Ball State University • Whitinger Business Building, room 149
2000 W. University Ave.
Muncie, IN 47306-0360
Phone:
765-285-5926
Email:
cber@bsu.edu
Website:
www.bsu.edu/cber
Facebook:
www.facebook.com/BallStateCBER
Twitter:
www.twitter.com/BallStateCBER
Close