Center for Business and Economic Research - Ball State University


CBER Data Center
Projects and PublicationsEconomic IndicatorsWeekly CommentaryCommunity Asset InventoryManufacturing Scorecard

About

Commentaries are published weekly and distributed through the Indianapolis Business Journal and many other print and online publications. Disclaimer

RSS Feed

Disclaimer

The views expressed in these commentaries do not reflect those of Ball State University or the Center for Business and Economic Research.

Recent

Trump’s Tariff Recession Is HereMy new forecast, completed in late April, predicts a national recession began as early as March in reaction to Trump’s tarriffs.

Two Key Economic Lessons in One BillHoosiers face trade-offs and opportunity costs in the wake of SEA1.

Time to Fix Economic Development PolicyAllocating tax dollars to land development won’t cause economic growth.

The Unanticipated Effects of SB1Businesses, governments and households may all feel the effects.

View archives

Top Tags

jobs and employment 261
economics 201
state and local government 188
education 186
indiana 171
economic development 171
budget and spending 145
taxes 144
law and public policy 142
workforce and human capital 139
Browse all tags
Reporter / Admin Login

June 1, 2009

Chrysler Bankruptcy Plan has Unintended Consequences

One ironclad rule of any public policy is unintended consequences. They may be small or large, but are almost never a happy story. The Obama administration is just beginning to see some of those unintended consequences arising from their pressure on the Chrysler bankruptcy plan.

In order to make Chrysler emerge from a quick bankruptcy the Administration accepted an unusual plan that was brought to bankruptcy court a few weeks back. The plan (which included two months of paid shutdown) divided a significant part of the company’s surviving assets. This is what happens in bankruptcy. The rules of bankruptcy are complex, but it comes down to handing out money (or stock in this case) to folks based upon when and how they gave the company money. The taxpayer is supposed to be first (if back taxes were owed), followed by lenders and finally investors. Of course, within each category money gets doled out depending on the level of government, the types of loans and the types of investments made by each group. All in all it is a lawyer’s dream.

In many cases, groups that are owed money agree to the new terms. If they don’t, or if the firm cannot figure out how to make the payments, the bankruptcy judge can have the firm liquidated – or sold off in parts. The Obama administration used their soft power of threats very effectively, making most investors and lenders accept relatively poor levels of compensation. They did this to allow much more resources to be directed to UAW pensions. This had the dual benefits of preventing the Pension Guarantee Trust (aka taxpayer) from picking up the pieces and benefiting a key political ally (the UAW).

To get this agreement in place, the administration busily demonized ‘investors’ whom it thought should be more willing to part with their money. The President even went so far as to say “. . . are the bond holders, the lenders, the money people, are they willing to make sacrifices . . .?” Investors should be easy to demonize. No doubt their representatives wear expensive suits and know how to order ten different types of coffee at Starbucks. Indeed, about 70 percent are groups already receiving bail-out funds.

Unfortunately for Chrysler some of these investors just might not be as easy to characterize as fat cats. In fact, it turns out, many of them are us. It should not be too surprising that in a country where 2/3rds of households own stock almost one third of Chryslers ‘investors’ are schoolteachers, college administrators, firefighters, and police officers. These vultures of Wall Street finance have seen the value of their hard work severely hampered by the Chrysler plan. Here in Indiana, our State Treasurer Richard Mourdock has taken the surprising step of honoring his oath of office and challenging the Chrysler arrangement on the grounds that it is illegal.

Chrysler has fired back at Indiana, threatening job losses if the case comes to court. Sounds like another good case of the law of unintended consequences.

Link to this commentary: https://commentaries.cberdata.org/61/chrysler-bankruptcy-plan-has-unintended-consequences

Tags: auto industry, pres. obama administration


About the Author

Michael Hicks cberdirector@bsu.edu

Michael J. Hicks, PhD, is the director of the Center for Business and Economic Research and the George and Frances Ball distinguished professor of economics in the Miller College of Business at Ball State University. Note: The views expressed here are solely those of the author, and do not represent those of funders, associations, any entity of Ball State University, or its governing body.

© Center for Business and Economic Research, Ball State University

About Ball State CBER Data Center

Ball State CBER Data Center is one-stop shop for economic data including demographics, education, health, and social capital. Our easy-to-use, visual web tools offer data collection and analysis for grant writers, economic developers, policy makers, and the general public.

Ball State CBER Data Center (cberdata.org) is a product of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. CBER's mission is to conduct relevant and timely public policy research on a wide range of economic issues affecting the state and nation. Learn more.

Terms of Service

Center for Business and Economic Research

Ball State University • Whitinger Business Building, room 149
2000 W. University Ave.
Muncie, IN 47306-0360
Phone:
765-285-5926
Email:
cber@bsu.edu
Website:
www.bsu.edu/cber
Facebook:
www.facebook.com/BallStateCBER
Twitter:
www.twitter.com/BallStateCBER
Close