Center for Business and Economic Research - Ball State University


CBER Data Center
Projects and PublicationsEconomic IndicatorsWeekly CommentaryCommunity Asset InventoryManufacturing Scorecard

About

Commentaries are published weekly and distributed through the Indianapolis Business Journal and many other print and online publications. Disclaimer

RSS Feed

Disclaimer

The views expressed in these commentaries do not reflect those of Ball State University or the Center for Business and Economic Research.

Recent

Two Key Economic Lessons in One BillHoosiers face trade-offs and opportunity costs in the wake of SEA1.

Time to Fix Economic Development PolicyAllocating tax dollars to land development won’t cause economic growth.

The Unanticipated Effects of SB1Businesses, governments and households may all feel the effects.

The Stupidest of PoliciesThis whipsawing of tariff rates has unnerved financial markets, which on Wednesday, were toying with a liquidity crisis.

View archives

Top Tags

jobs and employment 261
economics 201
state and local government 188
education 186
economic development 171
indiana 171
budget and spending 145
taxes 144
law and public policy 142
workforce and human capital 139
Browse all tags
Reporter / Admin Login

January 30, 2012

The State of the Union

The constitutional obligation of the U.S. president to report “from time to time” to Congress on the state of the union is a rightly awesome event.  Assembled in the halls of Congress, the elected bodies of the world’s oldest democracy are joined by the president, his cabinets, Joint Chiefs of Staff, members of the Supreme Court and many others. As the Congressional Sergeant at Arms, dressed not in a king’s livery but a sober grey suit, introduces the president, you’d have to be unaware of the sweep of history to not feel pride in our republic.

Of course the State of the Union is also a political event, and more so in an election year like this one.   The economics of this State of the Union address loom large.  How did it measure up?

The short answer is not well. The bacchanalia of the stimulus has limited spending choices far into the future. So, most of the policies outlined by Obama are wistful visions of a future that cannot be.  This stark reality plays poorly against the direction of his policy recommendations. 

As if to reinforce the malignancy of the fiscal problem, the president started his speech by touting the history of his job creation plan (bailing out GM), which cost the taxpayer a trifling $175,000 per job (perhaps the most efficient of the stimulus, according to White House figures).  At that rate we can eliminate unemployment for a mere $2.8 trillion a year, or an extra annual tax of $21,000 on each household.  No doubt these promises will collect some votes from gullible folks in swing states. 

We don’t all vote on economic issues (though this might soon change).  In this, Obama enjoys a wisdom his opposition needs take measure of.  Each year we spend good money giving the bum’s rush to young men and women who eager and ready to work in America; their only weakness is that they aren’t citizens.  If we cannot fix this we must abandon our national design on continued greatness.

Obama explained well the need for thoughtful education reform, though he needs some Hoosier courage on this as well.  He also highlighted the recent military successes in Iraq and Afghanistan.  These occurred on his watch at his order and he deserves credit and blame in equal measure depending on how they turn out.  Right now they look promising.

Afterwards Governor Daniels offered a contrast from the president. This was refreshing, not least because he offered two sweeping but tractable public policies that are needed to fix our fiscal disarray: tax and entitlement reform.  But Daniels’ real draw was that he has been successful in controlling spending in a way his national party brethren have not.

Two other aspects of Tuesday evening struck me. First both messages about the future came from two men who have chosen the Midwest as home.  Second, all the hot air and speechifying blew the clouds away from Muncie to reveal a memorable array of the northern lights. 

Link to this commentary: https://commentaries.cberdata.org/607/the-state-of-the-union

Tags: election, law and public policy


About the Author

Michael Hicks cberdirector@bsu.edu

Michael J. Hicks, PhD, is the director of the Center for Business and Economic Research and the George and Frances Ball distinguished professor of economics in the Miller College of Business at Ball State University. Note: The views expressed here are solely those of the author, and do not represent those of funders, associations, any entity of Ball State University, or its governing body.

© Center for Business and Economic Research, Ball State University

About Ball State CBER Data Center

Ball State CBER Data Center is one-stop shop for economic data including demographics, education, health, and social capital. Our easy-to-use, visual web tools offer data collection and analysis for grant writers, economic developers, policy makers, and the general public.

Ball State CBER Data Center (cberdata.org) is a product of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. CBER's mission is to conduct relevant and timely public policy research on a wide range of economic issues affecting the state and nation. Learn more.

Terms of Service

Center for Business and Economic Research

Ball State University • Whitinger Business Building, room 149
2000 W. University Ave.
Muncie, IN 47306-0360
Phone:
765-285-5926
Email:
cber@bsu.edu
Website:
www.bsu.edu/cber
Facebook:
www.facebook.com/BallStateCBER
Twitter:
www.twitter.com/BallStateCBER
Close