Center for Business and Economic Research - Ball State University


CBER Data Center
Projects and PublicationsEconomic IndicatorsWeekly CommentaryCommunity Asset InventoryManufacturing Scorecard

About

Commentaries are published weekly and distributed through the Indianapolis Business Journal and many other print and online publications. Disclaimer

RSS Feed

Disclaimer

The views expressed in these commentaries do not reflect those of Ball State University or the Center for Business and Economic Research.

Recent

Don’t Expect the UAW to GrowThere is no evidence of a resurgence in the UAW or other industrial unions today.

Thoughts About Trump’s Tax PlanIn considering any tax change, first ask how it might eventually reduce the debt.

China Is a Poor and Failing NationChina is getting in the way of its own economic growth.

Work From Home Is Here to StayAt least 1 million Hoosiers work from home at least one day per week.

View archives

Top Tags

jobs and employment 237
economics 180
education 153
economic development 153
state and local government 140
taxes 126
indiana 117
budget and spending 112
finance 110
migration and population change 109
Browse all tags
Reporter / Admin Login

January 30, 2012

The State of the Union

The constitutional obligation of the U.S. president to report “from time to time” to Congress on the state of the union is a rightly awesome event.  Assembled in the halls of Congress, the elected bodies of the world’s oldest democracy are joined by the president, his cabinets, Joint Chiefs of Staff, members of the Supreme Court and many others. As the Congressional Sergeant at Arms, dressed not in a king’s livery but a sober grey suit, introduces the president, you’d have to be unaware of the sweep of history to not feel pride in our republic.

Of course the State of the Union is also a political event, and more so in an election year like this one.   The economics of this State of the Union address loom large.  How did it measure up?

The short answer is not well. The bacchanalia of the stimulus has limited spending choices far into the future. So, most of the policies outlined by Obama are wistful visions of a future that cannot be.  This stark reality plays poorly against the direction of his policy recommendations. 

As if to reinforce the malignancy of the fiscal problem, the president started his speech by touting the history of his job creation plan (bailing out GM), which cost the taxpayer a trifling $175,000 per job (perhaps the most efficient of the stimulus, according to White House figures).  At that rate we can eliminate unemployment for a mere $2.8 trillion a year, or an extra annual tax of $21,000 on each household.  No doubt these promises will collect some votes from gullible folks in swing states. 

We don’t all vote on economic issues (though this might soon change).  In this, Obama enjoys a wisdom his opposition needs take measure of.  Each year we spend good money giving the bum’s rush to young men and women who eager and ready to work in America; their only weakness is that they aren’t citizens.  If we cannot fix this we must abandon our national design on continued greatness.

Obama explained well the need for thoughtful education reform, though he needs some Hoosier courage on this as well.  He also highlighted the recent military successes in Iraq and Afghanistan.  These occurred on his watch at his order and he deserves credit and blame in equal measure depending on how they turn out.  Right now they look promising.

Afterwards Governor Daniels offered a contrast from the president. This was refreshing, not least because he offered two sweeping but tractable public policies that are needed to fix our fiscal disarray: tax and entitlement reform.  But Daniels’ real draw was that he has been successful in controlling spending in a way his national party brethren have not.

Two other aspects of Tuesday evening struck me. First both messages about the future came from two men who have chosen the Midwest as home.  Second, all the hot air and speechifying blew the clouds away from Muncie to reveal a memorable array of the northern lights. 

Link to this commentary: https://commentaries.cberdata.org/607/the-state-of-the-union

Tags: election, law and public policy


About the Author

Michael Hicks cberdirector@bsu.edu

Michael J. Hicks, PhD, is the director of the Center for Business and Economic Research and the George and Frances Ball distinguished professor of economics in the Miller College of Business at Ball State University. Hicks earned doctoral and master’s degrees in economics from the University of Tennessee and a bachelor’s degree in economics from Virginia Military Institute. He has authored two books and more than 60 scholarly works focusing on state and local public policy, including tax and expenditure policy and the impact of Wal-Mart on local economies.

© Center for Business and Economic Research, Ball State University

About Ball State CBER Data Center

Ball State CBER Data Center is one-stop shop for economic data including demographics, education, health, and social capital. Our easy-to-use, visual web tools offer data collection and analysis for grant writers, economic developers, policy makers, and the general public.

Ball State CBER Data Center (cberdata.org) is a product of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. CBER's mission is to conduct relevant and timely public policy research on a wide range of economic issues affecting the state and nation. Learn more.

Terms of Service

Center for Business and Economic Research

Ball State University • Whitinger Business Building, room 149
2000 W. University Ave.
Muncie, IN 47306-0360
Phone:
765-285-5926
Email:
cber@bsu.edu
Website:
www.bsu.edu/cber
Facebook:
www.facebook.com/BallStateCBER
Twitter:
www.twitter.com/BallStateCBER
Close