Center for Business and Economic Research - Ball State University


CBER Data Center
Projects and PublicationsEconomic IndicatorsWeekly CommentaryCommunity Asset InventoryManufacturing Scorecard

About

Commentaries are published weekly and distributed through the Indianapolis Business Journal and many other print and online publications. Disclaimer

RSS Feed

Disclaimer

The views expressed in these commentaries do not reflect those of Ball State University or the Center for Business and Economic Research.

Recent

Two Key Economic Lessons in One BillHoosiers face trade-offs and opportunity costs in the wake of SEA1.

Time to Fix Economic Development PolicyAllocating tax dollars to land development won’t cause economic growth.

The Unanticipated Effects of SB1Businesses, governments and households may all feel the effects.

The Stupidest of PoliciesThis whipsawing of tariff rates has unnerved financial markets, which on Wednesday, were toying with a liquidity crisis.

View archives

Top Tags

jobs and employment 261
economics 201
state and local government 188
education 186
economic development 171
indiana 171
budget and spending 145
taxes 144
law and public policy 142
workforce and human capital 139
Browse all tags
Reporter / Admin Login

January 9, 2012

College Debt and College Majors

It is difficult for any American to not be a bit worried about college debt and what it might mean to the prosperity of the next generation.  As a professor, a father of three and a guy who paid off his last college debt in his mid 40s, it is a matter of some worry.  So a little thinking on the matter is due.

College education is expensive (mostly due to foregone earnings) but in terms of expenses, paying tuition for state schools is far less than half the cost of going to college.  Most students can receive very large, publicly subsidized loans. This is the source of most college debt, which today averages just over $22,000 for graduates of public universities.

For the average student, a college loan is far and away the single best investment he or she will ever make, but the variation in this rate of return is heavily influenced by the student’s chosen field of study.  There are other factors as well, and certainly the best students in any discipline will do well, but indulge my careful focus on college majors.

Few engineers, chemists, accounting or finance majors will find their college debt onerous or ill considered.  These are difficult majors, much in demand, well compensated and typically more costly to provide.  Many other majors are not in demand and in turn not highly compensated.  The evidence over the past two decades is unsettling.  A growing percentage of college graduates has pursued degrees that offer no employment prospects to match the cost of college.  This, it must be said, is neither the fault of the economy nor in most cases colleges.  The burden falls almost exclusively on the student.  Career information is abundant, free and unambiguous.  Quite honestly, individual mistakes in the choice of college major are not a compelling public policy problem.  It is a sign of abundance that so many young people can borrow money to pursue their dreams and existential joys by taking college degrees in fields with few employment prospects. 

It does not follow however, that taxpayers should subsidize that educational choice, or worry about student debt.  Our federal student loan programs make no distinction between a loan to a mechanical engineering student at MIT and a puppetry major at a community college.  No other government loan program so fully ignores the potential return on investment of individual applicants. That is a luxury of the past for which states typically hold colleges to task.  I recommend a new approach.

Federally subsidized college loans should be linked to the employment prospects of individual majors.  For example, federal student loan programs should offer the traditional ‘full’ loan for the first year or two of college (where the true liberal education resides).  Thereafter, the total student loan should not exceed half the average starting wages for students with that major nationwide. 

This serves two purposes.  First, it clearly announces to students what their degree is likely to add to their employment prospects.  Second, it prevents the accrual of huge public expense on the hobbies of the rich.

Link to this commentary: https://commentaries.cberdata.org/604/college-debt-and-college-majors

Tags: education, bailout and debt, education


About the Author

Michael Hicks cberdirector@bsu.edu

Michael J. Hicks, PhD, is the director of the Center for Business and Economic Research and the George and Frances Ball distinguished professor of economics in the Miller College of Business at Ball State University. Note: The views expressed here are solely those of the author, and do not represent those of funders, associations, any entity of Ball State University, or its governing body.

© Center for Business and Economic Research, Ball State University

About Ball State CBER Data Center

Ball State CBER Data Center is one-stop shop for economic data including demographics, education, health, and social capital. Our easy-to-use, visual web tools offer data collection and analysis for grant writers, economic developers, policy makers, and the general public.

Ball State CBER Data Center (cberdata.org) is a product of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. CBER's mission is to conduct relevant and timely public policy research on a wide range of economic issues affecting the state and nation. Learn more.

Terms of Service

Center for Business and Economic Research

Ball State University • Whitinger Business Building, room 149
2000 W. University Ave.
Muncie, IN 47306-0360
Phone:
765-285-5926
Email:
cber@bsu.edu
Website:
www.bsu.edu/cber
Facebook:
www.facebook.com/BallStateCBER
Twitter:
www.twitter.com/BallStateCBER
Close