Center for Business and Economic Research - Ball State University


CBER Data Center
Projects and PublicationsEconomic IndicatorsWeekly CommentaryCommunity Asset InventoryManufacturing Scorecard

About

Commentaries are published weekly and distributed through the Indianapolis Business Journal and many other print and online publications. Disclaimer

RSS Feed

Disclaimer

The views expressed in these commentaries do not reflect those of Ball State University or the Center for Business and Economic Research.

Recent

Yes, State Stimulus Checks Boost InflationTax reductions and rebates can only increase inflation.

Time to Dump the Rich States, Poor States RankingsTax policy is the wrong incentive to spur economic growth.

Mindless Economic Development Strategy?Much of what you see and read about these jobs announcements is raw political fiction.

Let Us Ask More of Ourselves on Memorial DayToday’s challenges demand an understanding of evolving facts and trends.

View archives

Top Tags

jobs and employment 217
economics 169
education 134
economic development 133
taxes 121
finance 105
state and local government 99
recession 96
budget and spending 88
unemployment and the labor market 84
Browse all tags
Reporter / Admin Login

August 22, 2011

Vouchers and the Law

The timing of a recent lawsuit by the Indiana State Teacher’s Association against Indiana’s school voucher program perfectly demonstrates the calculated disregard for the welfare of students and taxpayers that has come to define this teachers union.  The good news is that the courts saw through the suit and refused to stop some 2,200 poor kids from around the state taking advantage of a program that ultimately benefits Hoosiers.

Public schooling, especially in urban areas of Indiana, is very expensive and broadly quite poor.  Private schools, both religious and secular, are less costly and typically effective.  However, taxpayers are the ones who support public schools, so the out-of-pocket costs of private schools are unaffordable for most poor and working class families.  So it is primarily middle- and upper-income households who send their kids to private schools.  It is ironic that we give our poor children almost everything they need to escape poverty, except only thing that matters—a good education.  Vouchers provide this opportunity.

Indiana’s voucher program offers up to $4,500 in tuition for private schools to low-income families that have experienced public schools and found them wanting.  This year 2,200 kids applied—the biggest chunk coming from the torpid Indianapolis Public School system. 

The program is simple enough, but what is fomenting a lawsuit of nefarious timing?  Those of us concerned with the separation of church and state might well worry about public dollars flowing to parochial schools.  It certainly gave me pause, until I remembered some 65 years of the G.I. Bill doing the same.  Poor education is a far greater threat to our U.S. Constitution—even so, this position is the strongest of the feeble arguments against vouchers. 

Vouchers do not reduce funding for education.  In fact, the $4,500 maximum price tag saves the state a minimum of $6 million and perhaps twice that amount.  That is not a lot of money (it is only about $1000 for each IPS student who did not bother showing up for the first day of classes), but it is unambiguously taxpayer savings. 

To be sure, some schools will lose funding because students will flee from them, but that is hardly a cause for concern.  Schools that enjoy a monopoly but still cannot retain students ought to face declining budgets and perhaps close.  That these schools do not do so now is part and parcel of our educational problem.

Ironically, the voucher system is not designed to do great things on its own.  While it offers educational choice to low-income parents, that was not the point.  The real purpose of vouchers was to add incentives for public schools to improve.  The school voucher system is part of legislation designed to awaken a public school system that—though chock full of talented and caring teachers—continues to fail a large number of students.   

Vouchers pressure schools to perform.  They are to be celebrated, even as we must now consider ways to make school districts and families more accountable for their part in fixing education.

Link to this commentary: https://commentaries.cberdata.org/583/vouchers-and-the-law

Tags: education, incentives, education


About the Author

Michael Hicks cberdirector@bsu.edu

Michael J. Hicks, PhD, is the director of the Center for Business and Economic Research and the George and Frances Ball distinguished professor of economics in the Miller College of Business at Ball State University. Hicks earned doctoral and master’s degrees in economics from the University of Tennessee and a bachelor’s degree in economics from Virginia Military Institute. He has authored two books and more than 60 scholarly works focusing on state and local public policy, including tax and expenditure policy and the impact of Wal-Mart on local economies.

© Center for Business and Economic Research, Ball State University

About Ball State CBER Data Center

Ball State CBER Data Center is one-stop shop for economic data including demographics, education, health, and social capital. Our easy-to-use, visual web tools offer data collection and analysis for grant writers, economic developers, policy makers, and the general public.

Ball State CBER Data Center (cberdata.org) is a product of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. CBER's mission is to conduct relevant and timely public policy research on a wide range of economic issues affecting the state and nation. Learn more.

Terms of Service

Center for Business and Economic Research

Ball State University • Whitinger Business Building, room 149
2000 W. University Ave.
Muncie, IN 47306-0360
Phone:
765-285-5926
Email:
cber@bsu.edu
Website:
www.bsu.edu/cber
Facebook:
www.facebook.com/BallStateCBER
Twitter:
www.twitter.com/BallStateCBER
Close