Center for Business and Economic Research - Ball State University


CBER Data Center
Projects and PublicationsEconomic IndicatorsWeekly CommentaryCommunity Asset InventoryManufacturing Scorecard

About

Commentaries are published weekly and distributed through the Indianapolis Business Journal and many other print and online publications. Disclaimer

RSS Feed

Disclaimer

The views expressed in these commentaries do not reflect those of Ball State University or the Center for Business and Economic Research.

Recent

Two Key Economic Lessons in One BillHoosiers face trade-offs and opportunity costs in the wake of SEA1.

Time to Fix Economic Development PolicyAllocating tax dollars to land development won’t cause economic growth.

The Unanticipated Effects of SB1Businesses, governments and households may all feel the effects.

The Stupidest of PoliciesThis whipsawing of tariff rates has unnerved financial markets, which on Wednesday, were toying with a liquidity crisis.

View archives

Top Tags

jobs and employment 261
economics 201
state and local government 188
education 186
economic development 171
indiana 171
budget and spending 145
taxes 144
law and public policy 142
workforce and human capital 139
Browse all tags
Reporter / Admin Login

March 28, 2011

Debt and China

It is difficult to ignore the many voices that fret over China as the banker to the U.S. in its time of worsening debt.­ It is an easy thing to demagogue, and so lends itself to some economic scrutiny.

Despite its high levels of growth the People’s Republic of China is no place of economic miracles.­ It remains a dismal place, with average wages beneath what the U.S. enjoyed before Teddy Roosevelt was a soldier, much less president.­ China’s residents have the political freedoms of an African-American in South Carolina of about the same vintage, and it will take something like a century to close the wage gap.­ That is why China – or rather the People’s Bank of China – has chosen to purchase so much debt from the United States.­ They need to link themselves to the security of our economy.­ But, purchasing our debt, and being our banker are two different matters altogether.

The United States finances its lamentably large debt through the issuance of bonds (and similar financial instruments).­ This is a form of borrowing, but not one that is at all akin to bank borrowing.­ These bonds are sold in an open auction market and come due at an established interval.­ Ten-year bonds are the most common and, unlike a small business line of credit, cannot be called early.

The bond auction sets the interest rate American taxpayers must pay to borrow this money.­ The rates are low because our economy remains the most trustworthy in the world.­ Still, 18 cents on every dollar of taxes we pay goes to paying the interest on these bonds.­ As of the end of last year China held about $1.1 trillion in these securities, or about a quarter of the outstanding debt held by foreigners.­­ These are big numbers, even to an economist who once worked for the U.S. Air Force.­­ But what leverage does the Peoples Bank of China have over the U.S.?­ The short answer is none.­

A few pundits (possessed of more heated rhetoric than sizzling intellect) have claimed that China can simply call the debt.­ They cannot.­ They could sell the bonds, but the economists at the People’s Bank of China aren’t stupid.­ A big increase in the supply of bonds would reduce their price.­ If the People’s Bank of China wants to sell them off at a big loss, our Federal Reserve would be pleased to buy them back.­

However, it is more likely that our exploding debt will require us to pay higher rates, just like any indebted credit card holder.­

I am not a deficit hawk.­ In this column two years ago I argued the debt was not yet a problem and that we had a year or two to set ourselves on a sustainable fiscal path.­ Quite the opposite has since happened.­ The January 2011 deficit equaled the 2007 total annual deficit.­ In the end, it is the debt that threatens our national prosperity and security, not the folks who bought it.

Link to this commentary: https://commentaries.cberdata.org/560/debt-and-china


About the Author

Michael Hicks cberdirector@bsu.edu

Michael J. Hicks, PhD, is the director of the Center for Business and Economic Research and the George and Frances Ball distinguished professor of economics in the Miller College of Business at Ball State University. Note: The views expressed here are solely those of the author, and do not represent those of funders, associations, any entity of Ball State University, or its governing body.

© Center for Business and Economic Research, Ball State University

About Ball State CBER Data Center

Ball State CBER Data Center is one-stop shop for economic data including demographics, education, health, and social capital. Our easy-to-use, visual web tools offer data collection and analysis for grant writers, economic developers, policy makers, and the general public.

Ball State CBER Data Center (cberdata.org) is a product of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. CBER's mission is to conduct relevant and timely public policy research on a wide range of economic issues affecting the state and nation. Learn more.

Terms of Service

Center for Business and Economic Research

Ball State University • Whitinger Business Building, room 149
2000 W. University Ave.
Muncie, IN 47306-0360
Phone:
765-285-5926
Email:
cber@bsu.edu
Website:
www.bsu.edu/cber
Facebook:
www.facebook.com/BallStateCBER
Twitter:
www.twitter.com/BallStateCBER
Close