March 28, 2011
Debt and China
It is difficult to ignore the many voices that fret over China as the banker to the U.S. in its time of worsening debt. It is an easy thing to demagogue, and so lends itself to some economic scrutiny.
Despite its high levels of growth the People’s Republic of China is no place of economic miracles. It remains a dismal place, with average wages beneath what the U.S. enjoyed before Teddy Roosevelt was a soldier, much less president. China’s residents have the political freedoms of an African-American in South Carolina of about the same vintage, and it will take something like a century to close the wage gap. That is why China – or rather the People’s Bank of China – has chosen to purchase so much debt from the United States. They need to link themselves to the security of our economy. But, purchasing our debt, and being our banker are two different matters altogether.
The United States finances its lamentably large debt through the issuance of bonds (and similar financial instruments). This is a form of borrowing, but not one that is at all akin to bank borrowing. These bonds are sold in an open auction market and come due at an established interval. Ten-year bonds are the most common and, unlike a small business line of credit, cannot be called early.
The bond auction sets the interest rate American taxpayers must pay to borrow this money. The rates are low because our economy remains the most trustworthy in the world. Still, 18 cents on every dollar of taxes we pay goes to paying the interest on these bonds. As of the end of last year China held about $1.1 trillion in these securities, or about a quarter of the outstanding debt held by foreigners. These are big numbers, even to an economist who once worked for the U.S. Air Force. But what leverage does the Peoples Bank of China have over the U.S.? The short answer is none.
A few pundits (possessed of more heated rhetoric than sizzling intellect) have claimed that China can simply call the debt. They cannot. They could sell the bonds, but the economists at the People’s Bank of China aren’t stupid. A big increase in the supply of bonds would reduce their price. If the People’s Bank of China wants to sell them off at a big loss, our Federal Reserve would be pleased to buy them back.
However, it is more likely that our exploding debt will require us to pay higher rates, just like any indebted credit card holder.
I am not a deficit hawk. In this column two years ago I argued the debt was not yet a problem and that we had a year or two to set ourselves on a sustainable fiscal path. Quite the opposite has since happened. The January 2011 deficit equaled the 2007 total annual deficit. In the end, it is the debt that threatens our national prosperity and security, not the folks who bought it.
About the Author
Recent
The Legacy of Eric Holcomb’s AdministrationIndiana’s economy is better than it was when Holcomb took office, but there are some caveats.
School Choice Is a Good, Not Great Thing… Sort ofThe benefits are overestimated and misunderstood.
Indiana’s Commission on Higher Education Issues an Eye-Opening ReportOur current level of educational attainment and college attendance rates puts us squarely in the bottom 10 states and territories.
Sorting and Policy DivergenceWithout room for state-level differences in what it meant to be a Republican or Democrat, states began to align with national politics.
View archives