Center for Business and Economic Research - Ball State University


CBER Data Center
Projects and PublicationsEconomic IndicatorsWeekly CommentaryCommunity Asset InventoryManufacturing Scorecard

About

Commentaries are published weekly and distributed through the Indianapolis Business Journal and many other print and online publications. Disclaimer

RSS Feed

Disclaimer

The views expressed in these commentaries do not reflect those of Ball State University or the Center for Business and Economic Research.

Recent

Two Key Economic Lessons in One BillHoosiers face trade-offs and opportunity costs in the wake of SEA1.

Time to Fix Economic Development PolicyAllocating tax dollars to land development won’t cause economic growth.

The Unanticipated Effects of SB1Businesses, governments and households may all feel the effects.

The Stupidest of PoliciesThis whipsawing of tariff rates has unnerved financial markets, which on Wednesday, were toying with a liquidity crisis.

View archives

Top Tags

jobs and employment 261
economics 201
state and local government 188
education 186
economic development 171
indiana 171
budget and spending 145
taxes 144
law and public policy 142
workforce and human capital 139
Browse all tags
Reporter / Admin Login

July 13, 2009

LOIT Maintains Status Quo

Muncie’s current debate over the Local Option Income Tax (LOIT) is high cotton for journalistic musings. Property tax caps and a dwindling population and commercial base have left the city in the uncomfortable situation of cutting budgets. Since the bulk of costs are related to fire and police salaries few options are available. The city has turned to the short length of rope the legislature offered amidst the debate on property tax caps – the LOIT.

This past Monday hundreds of folks descended upon city hall to argue for and against the new tax. I’d love to relate it in detail but to do the event true justice requires an accomplished playwright. It had all the parts of high drama and farce: a threatening and psychotic voicemail orchestrated by the firefighters and sent to the mayor, a conspicuously absent city councilman (also a fireman) under multiple indictments related to election fraud, the UAW very publicly siding with the citizen’s taxpayer group against the firefighter union. And as with any good drama a touch of farce was present in the form of a community group spinning itself as the broker of fresh ideas, when they are really hawking more of the same old failed politics that have idled the city for a couple generations.

What struck me most throughout the two-hour session was that so few in the hall seemed to understand Muncie’s greatest threat – the status quo.

City government can really affect only two things about itself: tax rates and the quality of public services. Residents and businesses choose to locate in places based upon taxes and the quality of those services (typically amenities like parks, sidewalks, good roads and recreation facilities). Some people and businesses prefer low taxes and few services. Others are willing to pay higher taxes in return for better services. The past few decades have seen growth in communities that balance the two, be they high or low. While low tax /high quality services are rare (and attract lots of new residents), high taxes and poor public services are all too common. These places stagnate and dwindle.

Muncie, like a good many mid-sized cities in the Midwest, is losing population, commerce and options. Simply ‘getting by’ is the fastest road to ruin. Cities like Muncie have to listen more closely to the faint voices of two largely forgotten groups– those who have left the city and those who have chosen other locations outside the city. The leavers comprise one out of every 25 families since 2000, while more than half those who are newly hired by the city’s leading employers choose somewhere else to raise families. Muncie’s status quo is high tax, poor services. The status quo is long-term disaster.

Because of a poorly designed law, the city gets to levy a countywide LOIT. Ironically, this will only serve to exaggerate the public service quality rift between Muncie and the surrounding communities where dollars have been spent far more wisely. At least the road out of town will be well paved.

Link to this commentary: https://commentaries.cberdata.org/55/loit-maintains-status-quo

Tags: taxes


About the Author

Michael Hicks cberdirector@bsu.edu

Michael J. Hicks, PhD, is the director of the Center for Business and Economic Research and the George and Frances Ball distinguished professor of economics in the Miller College of Business at Ball State University. Note: The views expressed here are solely those of the author, and do not represent those of funders, associations, any entity of Ball State University, or its governing body.

© Center for Business and Economic Research, Ball State University

About Ball State CBER Data Center

Ball State CBER Data Center is one-stop shop for economic data including demographics, education, health, and social capital. Our easy-to-use, visual web tools offer data collection and analysis for grant writers, economic developers, policy makers, and the general public.

Ball State CBER Data Center (cberdata.org) is a product of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. CBER's mission is to conduct relevant and timely public policy research on a wide range of economic issues affecting the state and nation. Learn more.

Terms of Service

Center for Business and Economic Research

Ball State University • Whitinger Business Building, room 149
2000 W. University Ave.
Muncie, IN 47306-0360
Phone:
765-285-5926
Email:
cber@bsu.edu
Website:
www.bsu.edu/cber
Facebook:
www.facebook.com/BallStateCBER
Twitter:
www.twitter.com/BallStateCBER
Close