Center for Business and Economic Research - Ball State University


CBER Data Center
Projects and PublicationsEconomic IndicatorsWeekly CommentaryCommunity Asset InventoryManufacturing Scorecard

About

Commentaries are published weekly and distributed through the Indianapolis Business Journal and many other print and online publications. Disclaimer

RSS Feed

Disclaimer

The views expressed in these commentaries do not reflect those of Ball State University or the Center for Business and Economic Research.

Recent

Two Key Economic Lessons in One BillHoosiers face trade-offs and opportunity costs in the wake of SEA1.

Time to Fix Economic Development PolicyAllocating tax dollars to land development won’t cause economic growth.

The Unanticipated Effects of SB1Businesses, governments and households may all feel the effects.

The Stupidest of PoliciesThis whipsawing of tariff rates has unnerved financial markets, which on Wednesday, were toying with a liquidity crisis.

View archives

Top Tags

jobs and employment 261
economics 201
state and local government 188
education 186
economic development 171
indiana 171
budget and spending 145
taxes 144
law and public policy 142
workforce and human capital 139
Browse all tags
Reporter / Admin Login

April 27, 2001

U.S. Economic Growth: A Matter of Perspective?

The Bureau of Economic Analysis surprised many analysts by announcing that the U.S. economy actually accelerated slightly in the first quarter of 2001. The new figures on real Gross Domestic Product, while still preliminary, put the low point for the national economy in the fourth quarter of 2000, when the economy managed only a 1.0 percent annual rate of expansion. The question in the coming weeks is whether or not the BEA's portrait of the 2001 U.S. economy is sufficiently robust for policymakers and politicians to call off the death watch on the still living and breathing economic expansion. 

The 2.0 percent rate of expansion in the overall economy for the first quarter of 2001 was unquestionably on the high side of most people's expectations for the GDP report. The stronger than expected result was produced largely because of an abrupt rebound in consumer spending on durables and improvement in the balance of trade.Business spending on equipment remained very weak, but speculative investment in housing continued its double digit rate of growth. 

Those of us who were expecting much weaker results, or even calling for a recessionary contraction in the economy, are left to ponder what went wrong with our forecasts. Or, to put it more positively, what went right for the economy? 

Observing the economy from an Indiana perspective, where the effect of the business spending slowdown and the shutdowns in steel and motor vehicles can be seen in almost every community, might have made us too pessimistic. We know that the goods-producing side of the economy has been shrinking in relative size in the U.S. for decades, so was this a case of manufacturing and the rest of the economy moving in different directions? 

But the pure and simple fact from the GDP report is that it was consumer spending on durable goods, the old-fashioned driver of expansions throughout this century, that powered the overall economy towards faster growth. Indeed, the 11.9 percent rate of increase in durable goods spending, coupled with the continued slide in industrial output, resulted in an aggregate decrease in business inventories of $7.1 billion. This is the first decline in inventories in more than five years. 

Additionally, businesses' and consumers' sudden distaste for imports made that heady spending reverberate more loudly in the domestic economy. Total spending on imported goods plummeted at a surprising 11.7 percent rate. Even though exports were also off in the first quarter of 2001, the net effect was a gain for the overall economy. 

If the preliminary estimates hold up, it would appear that the inventory correction in manufacturing that has caused so much anguish to households and state governments is over, and that higher production schedules are ahead. 

There's still plenty to worry about for near-term future of the national economy. But its also clear from our first quarter economic report card that consumers have thus far been able to put it all in perspective. 

Link to this commentary: https://commentaries.cberdata.org/477/u-s-economic-growth-a-matter-of-perspective

Tags: economic development, finance


About the Author

Pat Barkey none@example.com

Patrick Barkey is director of the University of Montana Bureau of Business and Economic Research. He served previously as Director of the Bureau of Business Research (now the Center for Business and Economic Research) at Ball State University, overseeing and participating in a wide variety of projects in labor market research and state and regional economic policy issues. Note: The views expressed here are solely those of the author, and do not represent those of funders, associations, any entity of Ball State University, or its governing body.

© Center for Business and Economic Research, Ball State University

About Ball State CBER Data Center

Ball State CBER Data Center is one-stop shop for economic data including demographics, education, health, and social capital. Our easy-to-use, visual web tools offer data collection and analysis for grant writers, economic developers, policy makers, and the general public.

Ball State CBER Data Center (cberdata.org) is a product of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. CBER's mission is to conduct relevant and timely public policy research on a wide range of economic issues affecting the state and nation. Learn more.

Terms of Service

Center for Business and Economic Research

Ball State University • Whitinger Business Building, room 149
2000 W. University Ave.
Muncie, IN 47306-0360
Phone:
765-285-5926
Email:
cber@bsu.edu
Website:
www.bsu.edu/cber
Facebook:
www.facebook.com/BallStateCBER
Twitter:
www.twitter.com/BallStateCBER
Close