Center for Business and Economic Research - Ball State University


CBER Data Center
Projects and PublicationsEconomic IndicatorsWeekly CommentaryCommunity Asset InventoryManufacturing Scorecard

About

Commentaries are published weekly and distributed through the Indianapolis Business Journal and many other print and online publications. Disclaimer

RSS Feed

Disclaimer

The views expressed in these commentaries do not reflect those of Ball State University or the Center for Business and Economic Research.

Recent

Previewing the Long-Term Effects of TariffsThe dominant effect of the Trump tariffs will be to raise production costs on almost every American manufacturing firm.

It’s TDS to Suppose These Tariffs Are WorkingTrump has pushed the U.S. into an economic downturn that will be especially hurtful to Hoosiers.

Trump’s Tariff Recession Is HereMy new forecast, completed in late April, predicts a national recession began as early as March in reaction to Trump’s tarriffs.

Two Key Economic Lessons in One BillHoosiers face trade-offs and opportunity costs in the wake of SEA1.

View archives

Top Tags

jobs and employment 262
economics 203
state and local government 188
education 186
indiana 173
economic development 171
taxes 146
budget and spending 145
law and public policy 144
workforce and human capital 139
Browse all tags
Reporter / Admin Login

October 5, 2001

The Other Side of the Property Tax Debate

When was the last time you ever heard someone say something good about taxes? We don't literally tar and feather our tax collectors anymore, but in our rhetoric we do much the same thing. And in recent decades it has often been incumbent politicians, nominally empowered to do something about it, who've led the chorus of complaints.

Empathizing with Hoosiers over the evils of taxes, and in particular property taxes, has been a sure-fire applause line around the state for years, but the failure of leaders to actually deliver meaningful change has made the act start to wear thin. Unfortunately, the overly simplistic logic used in most tax-bashing tirades has done little to prepare the electorate for the real issues involved with comprehensive tax reform.

Thus we hear, for example, that the property tax is excessively harsh on farmers and should be reduced or eliminated, and that applying state sales taxes to internet commerce will kill or greatly curtail a promising new industry. With one's own tax bill on the line, such arguments quickly become very emotional. But a moment of rational reflection makes one realize that there must also be something desirable about these tax instruments that helps explain their longevity.

The starting point for a rational discussion of taxes must be a recognition that government at all levels requires funds to operate. There is ample ammunition to fuel a debate over size, role, and growth of government, but there is a practical limit on the cuts that can be made. This is particularly so for local governments that provide roads, public safety, and education.

In an environment where there are no "free" tax cuts, there is something to be said for Indiana's "three-legged stool" of roughly equal tax receipts from property, income and sales taxes. Each tax has its advantages and drawbacks, and reliance on all three gives the state and its localities some insulation from the negative aspects of each.

The rarely mentioned advantages of the property tax are nonetheless hard to deny. The elements of the tax base -- land, structures, and business plant and equipment -- are usually hard to move, thus the tax is difficult to avoid, at least in the short run. Its revenue stream is relatively reliable, enabling government to make longer term commitments. And there is at least an approximate relationship between the size and value of one's property and the amount of local public services consumed.

Many of the beefs that we have with the property tax are really over the way that our state carries it out, not with the tax itself. The fact that tax rates can drastically change from year to year with little voter input makes taxpayers feel helpless. The fact that tax liabilities can grow even as ability to pay shrinks makes the tax especially burdensome for some. And Indiana's peculiar process of assessment -- now acknowledged by all to be unconstitutional -- lends an air of arbitrariness and unfairness that goes down hard.

Should local government's reliance on this tax be eliminated or drastically scaled back? That may be the only feasible political solution. But reducing the take from property taxes creates problems as well. And we should realize that remedies for the harshest aspects of Indiana's system abound. Tax rates in Ohio are subject to approval in local referenda. Michigan employs a "circuit breaker" in its property tax to reduce liabilities for those with modest income. And 48 other states use market value as the basis for tax assessment, which can at the very least be understood.

We haven't fundamentally changed our proper

Link to this commentary: https://commentaries.cberdata.org/454/the-other-side-of-the-property-tax-debate

Tags: taxes


About the Author

Pat Barkey none@example.com

Patrick Barkey is director of the University of Montana Bureau of Business and Economic Research. He served previously as Director of the Bureau of Business Research (now the Center for Business and Economic Research) at Ball State University, overseeing and participating in a wide variety of projects in labor market research and state and regional economic policy issues. Note: The views expressed here are solely those of the author, and do not represent those of funders, associations, any entity of Ball State University, or its governing body.

© Center for Business and Economic Research, Ball State University

About Ball State CBER Data Center

Ball State CBER Data Center is one-stop shop for economic data including demographics, education, health, and social capital. Our easy-to-use, visual web tools offer data collection and analysis for grant writers, economic developers, policy makers, and the general public.

Ball State CBER Data Center (cberdata.org) is a product of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. CBER's mission is to conduct relevant and timely public policy research on a wide range of economic issues affecting the state and nation. Learn more.

Terms of Service

Center for Business and Economic Research

Ball State University • Whitinger Business Building, room 149
2000 W. University Ave.
Muncie, IN 47306-0360
Phone:
765-285-5926
Email:
cber@bsu.edu
Website:
www.bsu.edu/cber
Facebook:
www.facebook.com/BallStateCBER
Twitter:
www.twitter.com/BallStateCBER
Close