Center for Business and Economic Research - Ball State University


CBER Data Center
Projects and PublicationsEconomic IndicatorsWeekly CommentaryCommunity Asset InventoryManufacturing Scorecard

About

Commentaries are published weekly and distributed through the Indianapolis Business Journal and many other print and online publications. Disclaimer

RSS Feed

Disclaimer

The views expressed in these commentaries do not reflect those of Ball State University or the Center for Business and Economic Research.

Recent

Two Key Economic Lessons in One BillHoosiers face trade-offs and opportunity costs in the wake of SEA1.

Time to Fix Economic Development PolicyAllocating tax dollars to land development won’t cause economic growth.

The Unanticipated Effects of SB1Businesses, governments and households may all feel the effects.

The Stupidest of PoliciesThis whipsawing of tariff rates has unnerved financial markets, which on Wednesday, were toying with a liquidity crisis.

View archives

Top Tags

jobs and employment 261
economics 201
state and local government 188
education 186
economic development 171
indiana 171
budget and spending 145
taxes 144
law and public policy 142
workforce and human capital 139
Browse all tags
Reporter / Admin Login

March 29, 2010

What Cost for Healthcare Reform?

At the Battle of Asculum, the Greek General Pyrrhus managed to defeat a larger Roman Army, but at great cost – losing perhaps ten percent of his men. The early biographer Plutarch claims, that as Pyrrhus was congratulated on his victory he wryly noted that with one more such victory he should lose the war.

In 2008 healthcare reform of some type was wildly popular. Protection of Medicare, reform of prescription drug coverage, extensive liability reform, the formation of insurance pools, de-regulation of state insurance restrictions, and a host of other smaller reforms all polled well with the American people.

The legislation which has emerged is wildly unpopular. That is a tragedy, for significant parts of the bill must form the basis for any changes to health care markets. Health exchanges, insurance de-regulation, some limits to pre-existing conditions, taxing of high cost plans, reduction of tax breaks for health spending would be part of any plan. A complete repealing of this legislation is tossing the baby out with the bathwater.

Much of the fiscal solvency of the legislation is a mirage. While the CBO has it running a small surplus over the next decade, that is true only under three tall assumptions; Congress reduces Medicare payments by $500 billion over ten years, virtually everyone takes advantage of the insurance purchase provisions in the bill and there is a significant reduction in insurance costs. Anyone with a lick of sense must question all three of these assumptions. If even one proves wrong this bill adds significantly to the deficit and debt.

One obvious flaw is the seeming inconsistency of requiring insurance companies to provide coverage at the drop of a hat. A clever and healthy young adult must know that there’s no reason to buy insurance, you can simply wait until you become ill. The bill’s authors argue that this group will have access to subsidized health care plans, and failure to participate will result in a fine. Some state attorneys general may challenge the constitutionality of this provision. I don’t think it matters much, because the fine is about equal to one month’s insurance coverage for a health 21 year old. I’d wait for insurance until I was sick.

The potential flaws in this bill are so enormous that to opponents of the bill it looks like planned failure, designed to usher in a national health service. Some of these opponents wear funny hats and say outrageous things; but, it is folly to doubt that freedom trumps federal health care for many, if not most Americans. This will likely be clear in November.

The bill is also a tax hike that even if necessary (as some tax increases surely are), will cause job losses. It also has provisions that dis-incentivize firms from growing over 50 workers, taxes wheelchairs, artificial joints and oddly, kills call center jobs in Indiana.

Sadly, I think we have another decade of the health care fights. By the way, elephants and donkeys were widely used at the Battle of Asculum.

Link to this commentary: https://commentaries.cberdata.org/24/what-cost-for-healthcare-reform

Tags: health care


About the Author

Michael Hicks cberdirector@bsu.edu

Michael J. Hicks, PhD, is the director of the Center for Business and Economic Research and the George and Frances Ball distinguished professor of economics in the Miller College of Business at Ball State University. Note: The views expressed here are solely those of the author, and do not represent those of funders, associations, any entity of Ball State University, or its governing body.

© Center for Business and Economic Research, Ball State University

About Ball State CBER Data Center

Ball State CBER Data Center is one-stop shop for economic data including demographics, education, health, and social capital. Our easy-to-use, visual web tools offer data collection and analysis for grant writers, economic developers, policy makers, and the general public.

Ball State CBER Data Center (cberdata.org) is a product of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. CBER's mission is to conduct relevant and timely public policy research on a wide range of economic issues affecting the state and nation. Learn more.

Terms of Service

Center for Business and Economic Research

Ball State University • Whitinger Business Building, room 149
2000 W. University Ave.
Muncie, IN 47306-0360
Phone:
765-285-5926
Email:
cber@bsu.edu
Website:
www.bsu.edu/cber
Facebook:
www.facebook.com/BallStateCBER
Twitter:
www.twitter.com/BallStateCBER
Close