Center for Business and Economic Research - Ball State University


CBER Data Center
Projects and PublicationsEconomic IndicatorsWeekly CommentaryCommunity Asset InventoryManufacturing Scorecard

About

Commentaries are published weekly and distributed through the Indianapolis Business Journal and many other print and online publications. Disclaimer

RSS Feed

Disclaimer

The views expressed in these commentaries do not reflect those of Ball State University or the Center for Business and Economic Research.

Recent

Previewing the Long-Term Effects of TariffsThe dominant effect of the Trump tariffs will be to raise production costs on almost every American manufacturing firm.

It’s TDS to Suppose These Tariffs Are WorkingTrump has pushed the U.S. into an economic downturn that will be especially hurtful to Hoosiers.

Trump’s Tariff Recession Is HereMy new forecast, completed in late April, predicts a national recession began as early as March in reaction to Trump’s tarriffs.

Two Key Economic Lessons in One BillHoosiers face trade-offs and opportunity costs in the wake of SEA1.

View archives

Top Tags

jobs and employment 262
economics 203
state and local government 188
education 186
indiana 173
economic development 171
taxes 146
budget and spending 145
law and public policy 144
workforce and human capital 139
Browse all tags
Reporter / Admin Login

April 10, 2006

Understanding Urban Growth

Oakland County, Michigan, located northwest of the city of Detroit, is home to some of the wealthiest communities in the nation.  Its per capita income consistently ranks it nationally in the top five counties, and a visual tour of its majestic homes, well funded private schools, and sumptuous amenities confirms the material wealth of its residents.

So why aren’t economic developers trekking north to Michigan to discover the secrets of this county’s economic success?  The answer is simple.  Oakland County is also embedded in the Detroit metropolitan area, one of the worst performing large urban areas in the nation.  As recently as forty years ago one of the five most populous cities in the nation, today the city is home to fewer than one million people.  The cream of the economic crop may be gathered in one of its suburban counties, but the engine creating that wealth has been sputtering for decades.

That lesson should not be lost on us as we examine growth in our own communities.  Growth that occurs as people and businesses move from one side of a county, city, or township line to another is nice.  But it is the health of the entire region – on both sides of the tracks, if you will – that matters when it comes to creating a more durable wealth and prosperity.

The most visible case for this point for our state is the Indianapolis metropolitan statistical area (MSA), now renamed the Indianapolis-Carmel MSA.  The fringe counties of the state’s largest MSA consistently rank as the wealthiest, fastest growing counties in the state.  Indeed the comparison between Hamilton County and just about any other non-central Indiana county makes you wonder if you’re looking at the same state.

But for all the amazing growth in the fringe counties of Indianapolis – and it has been truly amazing – one stubborn and perhaps surprising fact remains.  Most of the jobs, particularly the high paying jobs, in the metro area remain in the city of Indianapolis.  In the 11-county MSA in 2004, almost three quarters of metro-wide payroll came from a single county:  Marion.  That lopsided result prevails despite the fact that growth in jobs and payroll since 1990 has been twice as fast outside the center county as within.

And that’s only part of the story.  Average earnings per job in Marion County have consistently remained roughly 20 percent higher than wages paid by employers in the outlying counties.  In 2004, Marion County employers paid $41,285, on average, to each worker, while those in outlying counties paid only $33,575.

Of course, that’s an apples-to-oranges comparison.  Indianapolis is a concentrated, urbanized area, with headquarters, skyscrapers, and state government within its jurisdiction that its suburbs and exurbs can’t match.  So let’s make it a better comparison, and bring in some other, similarly sized, similarly situated urban areas from nearby states.

The outlying counties of the Indianapolis-Carmel MSA – all except Marion – posted a blistering 197 percent growth in payroll over the years 1990-2004.  That reflects inflation, real wage growth, and, of course, increases in the number of jobs.  That was better than Columbus, Ohio, which had 143 percent growth in payroll, and Minneapolis (191 percent), but worse than Nashville’s 216 percent growth in payroll in their respective outlying counties.

But the central county comparisons across these same metro areas are much worse for us. Marion county’s 89 percent growth in payroll in the 15 year period was significantly below Columbus (107 percent), Minneapolis (106 percent) and Nashville (112 percent) central counties over the same period.

In a sense, the conclusion is obvious.  The health of the body is what’s important, not the health of the separate limbs.  But when those limbs are in different political jurisdictions, with different legacies, leadership, and tax bases, we often lose this focus.  Let’s hope our leaders never do.

Link to this commentary: https://commentaries.cberdata.org/223/understanding-urban-growth

Tags: economic development


About the Author

Pat Barkey none@example.com

Patrick Barkey is director of the University of Montana Bureau of Business and Economic Research. He served previously as Director of the Bureau of Business Research (now the Center for Business and Economic Research) at Ball State University, overseeing and participating in a wide variety of projects in labor market research and state and regional economic policy issues. Note: The views expressed here are solely those of the author, and do not represent those of funders, associations, any entity of Ball State University, or its governing body.

© Center for Business and Economic Research, Ball State University

About Ball State CBER Data Center

Ball State CBER Data Center is one-stop shop for economic data including demographics, education, health, and social capital. Our easy-to-use, visual web tools offer data collection and analysis for grant writers, economic developers, policy makers, and the general public.

Ball State CBER Data Center (cberdata.org) is a product of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. CBER's mission is to conduct relevant and timely public policy research on a wide range of economic issues affecting the state and nation. Learn more.

Terms of Service

Center for Business and Economic Research

Ball State University • Whitinger Business Building, room 149
2000 W. University Ave.
Muncie, IN 47306-0360
Phone:
765-285-5926
Email:
cber@bsu.edu
Website:
www.bsu.edu/cber
Facebook:
www.facebook.com/BallStateCBER
Twitter:
www.twitter.com/BallStateCBER
Close