March 1, 2010
Paying for Past Choices
Twenty-odd years ago I found myself in the enviable position of infantry 2nd Lieutenant and executive officer of a basic training company. Among the many tasks of a company executive officer is feeding soldiers. Why that was entrusted to a 22-year-old is beyond reason; but since tradition dictated the exec ate last, I was at least enormously attentive to appropriate portions for the 300 soldiers we fed thrice daily. Otherwise, I went hungry.
We were given a bit of leeway on meals, relying on a system that counted different meals as points, not dollars. I could choose what types of meals we wanted. So, we could eat two portions of a low point meal (like chili-mac) or a single high point meal (like steak). We were all young and hungry so quantity mattered a lot. Cheap food and lots of it were devoured in the field. We ate the good stuff on special days (Sundays mostly). We did the same thing with ammunition and transportation. The drill sergeants (who taught me more than any professor) and I were experts at making budget choices. But it was the army, so there was no shortage of grumbling. I explained the dilemma to my company in terms of trade-offs, not dollars. We could eat double rations of chili-mac or one steak; take lots of 3-mile marches and then ride on a 12-mile trip. I think that remains the best way to explain budget choices. We all understand trade-offs.
A few communities in Indiana are struggling with budget choices. I work in one of these communities, and its woes are a perfect illustration of the problem of explaining budget terms in relatively abstract terms (like millions of dollars) instead of concrete trade-offs. For at least thirty years, Muncie has been making bad choices about the mix of things the city buys. We are making budget cuts today that could well have been slowly phased-in for a generation. What are the implications?
Muncie, like most places now struggling with budgets, is missing some key amenities. So here’s the question: If we had had the courage 30 years ago to make the cuts we now have to make, and used the extra revenue for something else what would we have? The answer is terribly disheartening.
If we’d made the budget cuts 30 years ago we now could have three indoor community pools, a completely revitalized arts center, paved streets with modern traffic control systems. Muncie’s schools could have had an extra $1.5 million dollars annually for reading programs and all day kindergarten. We would also have a bigger tax base and lower taxes because these things attract residents and businesses.
Oh, and for those 30 or so young Muncie firefighters who lost their jobs because of much needed budget cuts. They are just like my soldiers who ate chili-mac four days a week. The only difference is that there’s no steak night for them, or for taxpayers.
About the Author
Educational Attainment, the 21st Century Fund and the Future of SchoolingIndiana ranks 42nd in educational attainment.
Big Savings for Ending Prevailing WageMy statistical models show that repealing state prevailing wage laws save taxpayers money.
Re-Thinking Economic Development A large share of the most mobile families—perhaps half—no longer need to live near where they work.
Money Illusion and InflationPrice fluctuation could cause inflation to last longer, but it didn’t cause the inflation, it simply extends the pain.View archives