Center for Business and Economic Research - Ball State University


CBER Data Center
Projects and PublicationsEconomic IndicatorsWeekly CommentaryCommunity Asset InventoryManufacturing Scorecard

About

Commentaries are published weekly and distributed through the Indianapolis Business Journal and many other print and online publications. Disclaimer

RSS Feed

Disclaimer

The views expressed in these commentaries do not reflect those of Ball State University or the Center for Business and Economic Research.

Recent

It’s TDS to Suppose These Tariffs Are WorkingTrump has pushed the U.S. into an economic downturn that will be especially hurtful to Hoosiers.

Trump’s Tariff Recession Is HereMy new forecast, completed in late April, predicts a national recession began as early as March in reaction to Trump’s tarriffs.

Two Key Economic Lessons in One BillHoosiers face trade-offs and opportunity costs in the wake of SEA1.

Time to Fix Economic Development PolicyAllocating tax dollars to land development won’t cause economic growth.

View archives

Top Tags

jobs and employment 262
economics 203
state and local government 188
education 186
indiana 173
economic development 171
taxes 146
budget and spending 145
law and public policy 144
workforce and human capital 139
Browse all tags
Reporter / Admin Login

January 14, 2008

Property Taxes and the Sub Prime Mess

Economists don’t favor tax changes to achieve short-term gains.  The long lag time between recognizing problems, legislating solutions and implementing tax changes argues against fiscal policy as a remedy for economic woes.  Monetary policy is faster. 

This does not mean that taxes don’t matter.  Several instances of accidental economic stabilization have occurred.  The most recent example is the Bush tax cuts.  Designed as early as 1999 as a permanent reduction in income taxes, they were implemented just as the country started into the last recession.  Leaving aside the debate over the efficacy of the Bush tax cuts, they did come at a lucky time, lessening the effects of the recession that gripped us in late summer and early fall 2001. We just might be in a similar situation with Indiana’s property taxes.

The subprime mess continues to capture our attention.  One facet of subprime mortgages is that many are adjustable rate mortgages (or ARM’s) which are now seeing significant increases across the country.  This makes holding onto homes difficult for many homeowners (many of whom believed they could easily refinance their homes before the adjustable rate occurred). 

I don’t know specifically where in Indiana these adjustable rate mortgages are most prevalent.  But, I do know where mortgage foreclosures rates are at their highest.  My guess is that they are good indicators of adjustable rate mortgages. 

Here’s where it gets really interesting.

While working on our property tax studies at Ball State we compared several maps of property tax rates and foreclosure rates. Interestingly, when we overlay these two maps we find high property tax rates and foreclosures occur in many of the same places. 

Now admittedly, the geographic match isn’t perfect.  Some of the locations are rapidly growing Indianapolis suburbs, while others are frankly, struggling smaller towns.  Unfortunately, it will take months if not years to really understand where the problems are and what the cause may be.  But, as a call to policy action this coincidence is significant.

If we are to fix property taxes (and who doesn’t really think a remedy is in order) then we should do so sooner rather than later.  The reason is that we might get significant, unintended benefits from doing so now.  Here’s why.

Tax reform will almost certainly have its largest effect in places with high tax rates – which are also places with higher foreclosure rates.  By my calculations, a 1 percent cap will reduce housing costs by the equivalent of more than one month’s mortgage in the most heavily taxed locations.  That is not enough to mitigate the costs of the typical adjustable rate mortgage increase.  But, it might be enough for many homeowners to successfully renegotiate their loans and stay in their homes.

I don’t believe we should rush to the rescue of the financially irresponsible (lenders or borrowers).  But, we might be able to ease Indiana’s subprime fallout while reforming a flawed property tax system.  Now that would be lucky.

Link to this commentary: https://commentaries.cberdata.org/130/property-taxes-and-the-sub-prime-mess

Tags: taxes


About the Author

Michael Hicks cberdirector@bsu.edu

Michael J. Hicks, PhD, is the director of the Center for Business and Economic Research and the George and Frances Ball distinguished professor of economics in the Miller College of Business at Ball State University. Note: The views expressed here are solely those of the author, and do not represent those of funders, associations, any entity of Ball State University, or its governing body.

© Center for Business and Economic Research, Ball State University

About Ball State CBER Data Center

Ball State CBER Data Center is one-stop shop for economic data including demographics, education, health, and social capital. Our easy-to-use, visual web tools offer data collection and analysis for grant writers, economic developers, policy makers, and the general public.

Ball State CBER Data Center (cberdata.org) is a product of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. CBER's mission is to conduct relevant and timely public policy research on a wide range of economic issues affecting the state and nation. Learn more.

Terms of Service

Center for Business and Economic Research

Ball State University • Whitinger Business Building, room 149
2000 W. University Ave.
Muncie, IN 47306-0360
Phone:
765-285-5926
Email:
cber@bsu.edu
Website:
www.bsu.edu/cber
Facebook:
www.facebook.com/BallStateCBER
Twitter:
www.twitter.com/BallStateCBER
Close