Center for Business and Economic Research - Ball State University


CBER Data Center
Projects and PublicationsEconomic IndicatorsWeekly CommentaryCommunity Asset InventoryManufacturing Scorecard

About

Commentaries are published weekly and distributed through the Indianapolis Business Journal and many other print and online publications. Disclaimer

RSS Feed

Disclaimer

The views expressed in these commentaries do not reflect those of Ball State University or the Center for Business and Economic Research.

Recent

The 246th Anniversary of ‘The Great Experiment’Our nation may be at its most divided, but I have great hope.

Inflation Affects Each Family DifferentlyWe understand earthquakes and hurricanes better than we do inflation.

Yes, State Stimulus Checks Boost InflationTax reductions and rebates can only increase inflation.

Time to Dump the Rich States, Poor States RankingsTax policy is the wrong incentive to spur economic growth.

View archives

Top Tags

jobs and employment 217
economics 169
education 134
economic development 133
taxes 121
finance 105
state and local government 99
recession 96
budget and spending 88
unemployment and the labor market 84
Browse all tags
Reporter / Admin Login

June 9, 2008

Competition Lowers Cable Costs

A couple of weeks ago I returned home one evening to find our old cable TV box sitting on the kitchen table.  My wife had grown tired of the high price for our bundled cable TV and broadband internet and called a rival company.  When she was quoted the new price, it was out with the old and in with the new at record speed.  It turns out that there was a nice, new service available on our street that allowed her to choose cable TV, telephone and broadband from a phone company.  Now, as a rule I don’t like to give ad hoc economics lessons to my wife, but seeing as how she’d found a new bargain I thought I would try it.  Here’s what I told her. 

Isn’t it great to live in Indiana, the first state to allow true competition in telecommunications with the passage of HEA 1279 in 2006.  The legislation (often called video franchising) has been adopted by more than 20 states in the past two years and is the national model for promoting competition in telecommunications services (like broadband in rural areas). 

The big news for most consumers isn’t just the access to broadband, but that prices would drop.  We were able to bundle our home phone, cable TV and broadband for less than two of these services from our own local cable TV company.  Just like economic theory tells us:  competition lowers prices – about 40 percent in our case. 

What I didn’t tell her was that there was strong opposition to HEA 1279 from a lot of vested interests.  Obviously, the local cable TV companies fought this law tooth and nail.  Life as a monopolist is too easy to give up without a fight.  Indiana’s Citizen Action Coalition also argued against the legislation.  I guess they don’t want the state to surrender any regulatory power, no matter how obsolete it might be today. 

I also didn’t tell her that a recent study by the Digital Policy Institute at Ball State University had found significant economic impact of deregulation. This included 2,200 telecommunications workers and over $500 million in new investment in Indiana. 

Sadly, there seems to be one last hold-out in the Indiana legislature who wants to reverse the law (but then he used to work for a regulator). This Representative just released a statement chastising the legislation and calling into question the work of the Digital Policy Institute. The one thing in his press release that bothered me is that he claims to know nothing about the expected price cuts the law was expected to deliver.  He wrote that the only thing he has seen was his Cable TV bill go up by 7 percent. 

This lawmaker needs my wife advising him on his home telecommunications policy (it works for me). Here’s a hint.  If you don’t like your current cable provider’s price, just call their competition (and thank Indiana’s leaders while you are at it).

Link to this commentary: https://commentaries.cberdata.org/110/competition-lowers-cable-costs

Tags: news media, prices and inflation


About the Author

Michael Hicks cberdirector@bsu.edu

Michael J. Hicks, PhD, is the director of the Center for Business and Economic Research and the George and Frances Ball distinguished professor of economics in the Miller College of Business at Ball State University. Hicks earned doctoral and master’s degrees in economics from the University of Tennessee and a bachelor’s degree in economics from Virginia Military Institute. He has authored two books and more than 60 scholarly works focusing on state and local public policy, including tax and expenditure policy and the impact of Wal-Mart on local economies.

© Center for Business and Economic Research, Ball State University

About Ball State CBER Data Center

Ball State CBER Data Center is one-stop shop for economic data including demographics, education, health, and social capital. Our easy-to-use, visual web tools offer data collection and analysis for grant writers, economic developers, policy makers, and the general public.

Ball State CBER Data Center (cberdata.org) is a product of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. CBER's mission is to conduct relevant and timely public policy research on a wide range of economic issues affecting the state and nation. Learn more.

Terms of Service

Center for Business and Economic Research

Ball State University • Whitinger Business Building, room 149
2000 W. University Ave.
Muncie, IN 47306-0360
Phone:
765-285-5926
Email:
cber@bsu.edu
Website:
www.bsu.edu/cber
Facebook:
www.facebook.com/BallStateCBER
Twitter:
www.twitter.com/BallStateCBER
Close